This week’s Pandora Report includes news from the Biodefense Graduate Program, updates on US sanctions against Sudan and EU sanctions against Russia, yet more chaos at HHS, the passage of the landmark Pandemic Agreement, and more.
Schar School Names 2025 Student of the Year Award Winners
“Each year the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University presents awards to the top students in each undergraduate and graduate program. This year, the award winners accepted medals and certificates from their program directors in a family-and-friends ceremony at George Mason’s Krasnow Institute on the Fairfax Campus on Wednesday, May 14, just a few hours before the Schar School Degree Celebration at EagleBank Arena.”

Margeaux Malone (pictured above with Biodefense Graduate Program Director Gregory Koblentz) was this year’s Outstanding Biodefense MS Student. Read more about this year’s winners here.
Biodefense Student Interning at Arms Control Association
Lena Kroepke, a graduate student in the MS Biodefense program at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government, has been selected for a summer internship with the Arms Control Association (ACA). The nonpartisan organization is internationally recognized for its critical work in promoting arms control and non-proliferation measures. During her 10-week internship, Lena will contribute to ACA’s research and policy analysis which includes publications in the monthly Arms Control Today journal. The role will allow her to engage with leading experts in the field and to support valuable initiatives that enhance international security by lowering the global threat stemming from weapons of mass destruction.
Attacks on Healthcare Grew in Number in 2024
According to a new report from Safeguarding Health in Conflict, “Epidemic of Violence: Violence Against Health Care in Conflict,” there were more than 3,600 attacks on health workers, hospitals, and clinics in conflict zones around the world last year. This number is 15% higher than those of 2023, and includes things like air, missile, and drone strikes on healthcare facilities, in addition to lootings and takeovers of facilities as well as arrest and detention of health workers.
More than a third of the incidents recorded in this report occurred in Gaza and the West Bank. Hundreds more occurred in places like Ukraine, Sudan, Myanmar, and Lebanon. Len Rubenstein, Chair of the Safeguarding Health in Conflict Coalition, describes assaults on health care in conflicts globally as having “reached new levels of horror.”
Further Reading:
- “Attacks on Healthcare in War Zones in 2024 reach ‘New Levels of Horror’-Report,” Kat Lay, The Guardian
Kiribati Accedes to BWC
This week, the Republic of Kiribati deposited its instrument of accession to the Biological Weapons Convention with the United States. The island nation previously participated in the Fourth Session of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Biological Weapons Convention as an Observer State last year. Kiribati is now the 189th state to have ratified or acceded to the BWC.
US Set to Sanction Sudan Over CW Use
The US Department of State announced this week that the US will sanction Sudan’s military-led government after determining that it did use chemical weapons last year. While the announcement is brief and lacks details, it does explain that the State Department has notified Congress that Sudan violated the CWC, and that sanctions will be imposed after a fifteen day Congressional notification period. It states that the US determined on April 24, 2025, that, under the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991, the Government of Sudan used CW in 2024. The Biden administration previously sanctioned Sudan’s army head, GEN Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, who US officials at the time said privately had authorized the use of CW.
EU Announces Sanctions Against Russian Armed Forces for CW Use in Ukraine
The Delegation of the European Union to Ukraine announced this week that the Council has decided to impose additional sanctions on three Russian entities involved in the development and use of CW. These include the Radiological Chemical and Biological Defence Troops, the 27th Scientific Centre, and the 33rd Central Scientific Research and Testing Institute of the Russian Federation’s Ministry of Defence, all of whom are members of the Russian Armed Forces. According to a press release from the Delegation, “This decision was taken in light of the reports issued by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in November 2024 and February 2025, confirming the presence of riot control agents such as chemical CS (2-Chlorobenzalmalononitrile) and related compounds in the samples collected at the frontlines in Ukraine. Such agents have been used as a method of warfare by Russian forces in Ukraine, in breach of the Chemical Weapons Convention, to which Russia is a State Party.”
Further Reading:
- “EU Countries Adopt Four Sets of New Russia Sanctions,” Julia Payne, Reuters
WHO Members Adopt Pandemic Agreement
WHO Member States formally adopted the Pandemic Agreement this week, following three years of intense negotiations aimed at addressing gaps and inequities identified in national and global COVID-19 responses. The Agreement establishes the principles, approaches, and tools for better international coordination across many areas, with the goal of strengthening the global health architecture for pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. This includes things like equitable and timely access to vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics.
In reference to national sovereignty, the Agreements says, “Nothing in the WHO Pandemic Agreement shall be interpreted as providing the Secretariat of the World Health Organization, including the Director-General of the World Health Organization, any authority to direct, order, alter or otherwise prescribe the national and/or domestic law, as appropriate, or policies of any Party, or to mandate or otherwise impose any requirements that Parties take specific actions, such as ban or accept travellers, impose vaccination mandates or therapeutic or diagnostic measures or implement lockdowns.”
Further Reading:
- “Pandemic Preparedness: WHO Adopts Landmark Agreement,” Matthew Ward Agius, Deutsche Welle
- “With U.S. Absent, WHO Adopts Pandemic Treaty Aimed at Improving Vaccine Access,” Andrew Joseph, STAT News
- “For the First Time, the U.S. is Absent from WHO’s Annual Assembly. What’s the Impact?” Jonathan Lambert, NPR
- “How to Fight the Next Pandemic, Without America,” The Economist
China Set to Donate $500 Million to WHO
In a move that should not surprise anyone, the PRC has pledged $500 million in donations to the WHO, setting the country up to replace the United States as the organization’s top state donor and expanding Beijing’s influence in global health. Liu Guozhong, Vice Premier of the PRC, told the WHA this week that his country his making this contribution to oppose unilateralism, something the PRC often accuses the US of creating and leveraging in international spaces. Liu said in his remarks, “The world is now facing the impacts of unilateralism and power politics, bringing major challenges to global health security…China strongly believes that only with solidarity and mutual assistance can we create a healthy world together.”
What Rhymes With “Mess?” HHS
Kennedy Calls for Global Health Cooperation Outside of the WHO
HHS Secretary RFK Jr. called on Tuesday for other countries to work with the United States on global issues outside of the WHO. This came as he rejected the Pandemic Agreement that WHO members adopted at the WHA. In pre-recorded remarks that were played at the WHA on Tuesday, Kennedy said, “We want to free international health cooperation from the straitjacket of political interference by corrupting influences of the pharmaceutical companies, of adversarial nations and their [non-governmental organization] proxies.” He added “Global cooperation on health is still critically important to President Trump and myself, but it isn’t working very well under the WHO, as the failures of the Covid era demonstrate.” He also called the organization “moribund,” and described it as “mired in bureaucratic bloat”.
Kennedy later accused WHO of succumbing to pressure from the PRC to suppress reports that COVID-19 was transmitted between humans in the early days of the pandemic. He also claimed that the WHO “worked with China to promote the fiction that Covid originated from bats or pangolins, rather than from Chinese government-sponsored research at a biolab in Wuhan,” echoing sentiments from President Trump, who has gone all in on backing the lab leak theory.
Federal Judge Extends Block on HHS Public Health Funds Termination
A ruling from Judge Mary McElroy of the US District court for the District of Rhode Island temporarily extends the restraining order she issued in April to stop the administration from terminating pandemic-era funding to 23 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia. The ruling was released last Friday, once again blocking the administration from clawing back more than $11 billion in public health funding used by state and local health departments. According to state and local health officials, the funding was already in their accounts, and they were allowed to use these funds for non-COVID-19 related priorities, including the measles outbreak. Attorneys suing the administration in this case say HHS acted unlawfully by suddenly ending the grants without analyzing the benefits of the funding and the consequences of its termination.
Bhattacharya Backs Lab Leak Theory at First Town Hall
Jay Bhattacharya, the NIH Director, made remarks this week regarding the lab leak theory of SARS-CoV-2’s origin this week, prompting some NIH staff to walk out of his first town hall at the organization. He said, “It’s possible that the pandemic was caused by research conducted by human beings, and it is also possible that the NIH partly sponsored that research.” This prompted dozens to walk out of the town hall, which was met with applause from others in attendance.
As the applause continued, Bhattacharya continued, saying “It’s nice to have free speech. If it’s true that we sponsored research that caused the pandemic, and if you look at polls of the American people, that’s what most people believe, and I’ve looked at the scientific evidence and I believe it, what we have to do is make sure that we don’t engage in research that is any risk…to human populations,” before touting Trump’s executive order on GoF research.
During his remarks, Bhattacharya also indicated his organization may soon recall some terminated employees, saying he hopes to bring people back from RIFs as needed. Notably, NIH has already recalled some employees, but it has required that another person be RIFed for each one brought back, so the same number of people remain impacted. He also mocked the “five things” emails required by DOGE, calling them silly and unnecessary.
Further Reading:
- “Trump’s Last Minute Gain-of-Function Policy Could Sow Researcher Confusion,” Matt Field, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
- “Trump’s NIH Chief Lets Loose on Fauci, Vaccines and Covid Cover-Ups,” Tim Röhn, Politico
NIH Grant Rejections Have More Than Doubled Under Trump 2.0
According to reporting from Nature, the NIH has drastically increased the number of grant applications it has rejected since the new administration began. So far this year, at least 2,500 applications for research funding have been withdrawn, a number NIH uses to denote refusal for administrative reasons. This means that more than double the number of applications were withdrawn this year than in the same period in each of the last two years, according to an anonymous NIH official who spoke to Nature. The bulk of the withdrawals appear to have been made because NIH closed about 100 funding categories in February and March, many of which supported researchers from diverse backgrounds or early career investigators.
Further Reading:
- “Trump Has Cut Science Funding to Its Lowest Levels in Decades,” Aatish Bhatia, Irineo Cabreros, Asmaa Elkeurti, and Ehtan Singer, The New York Times
- “The Mystery of Trump’s Science Cuts,” Derek Robertson,” Politico

“Safeguarding Against Biological Weapons”
Schar School associate professor Sonia Ben Ouagrham-Gormley recently published this article in Science, in which she explains of the Biological Weapons Convention, “The lack of a formal verification mechanism has been the greatest weakness of the treaty, allowing signatories such as the Soviet Union and Iraq to violate the agreement for years. A proposal to improve its implementation through on-site inspections was negotiated by state members in the mid-1990s, but it was abruptly shut down in 2001 by the United States, which argued that compliance with the treaty was not verifiable because of the “dual-use” nature of biotechnologies and materials—those with both civilian and military use. The United States failed to recognize at the time that onsite inspections could be powerful instruments of implementation for the Convention because they target two major vulnerabilities of covert bioweapons programs—fragility of bioagents and fear of detection.”
“Trump’s Last Minute Gain-of-Function Policy Could Sow Researcher Confusion”
Matt Field recently published this article in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. It includes an interview with Biodefense Program Director Gregory Koblentz about Trump’s May 5 executive order requiring an existing policy to either be revised or replaced and what this means for pathogen research.
“A Pandemic Treaty Without Teeth Will Leave Africa and the World Exposed”
Ebere Okereke authored this article for Think Global Health discussing the Pandemic Agreement, writing in part “At first glance, the treaty seems to address the deep structural failures that the COVID-19 pandemic exposed. A closer look, though, reveals a familiar trap: lofty declarations without legal obligations or financial guarantees. Worse, the current geopolitical climate threatens to sap the treaty’s legitimacy and effectiveness before it even comes into force.”
“Fate Unknown: The Pandemic Agreement’s Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing”
Mark Eccleston-Turner, Michelle Rourke, and Stephanie Switzer published this Think Global Health article about pathogen access and benefit sharing (PABS), explaining “Advocates of PABS believe that it will secure pathogen samples for research and development (R&D) and deliver equity by providing a legal mechanism for low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) to access vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics (VTDs) in a competitive pharmaceutical marketplace that often excludes these nations…In our view, PABS ties together “two separate public health resource allocation problems: (1) pathogen and data sharing and (2) pharmaceutical supply and distribution.” Both are vital activities that would be more effectively addressed separately. Nevertheless, WHO member states have chosen to connect these issues through the PABS system, setting themselves the ambitious and possibly unrealistic target of negotiating the PABS annex within one year…”
“Why We Should Seriously Consider Vaccinating Wild Birds to Control Bird Flu”
Lynn C. Klotz recently published this article in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, writing in part “But by now bird flu is out of the barn, so to speak. It’s infected nearly 500 species of wild birds and mammals ranging from foxes to zoo tigers. It’s time to consider another means of stopping its spread: vaccinating wild birds and, perhaps, other wildlife. By doing so, we will rescue large numbers of animals from a painful death, slow the transmission of infections, and reduce the probability of a pandemic in humans. These outcomes provide reason enough to vaccinate wildlife.“
“Keeping Ahead of Contagion”
Deena Mousa makes the case for making use of airborne pathogen detection in response to H5N1 in this piece for Asimov Press, writing in part “As the bird flu spreads in the United States, the CDC should act with the same urgency it showed after the 2001 anthrax attacks, when it deployed the Laboratory Response Network and launched the BioWatch program. If we can clear these remaining hurdles, real-time pathogen monitoring could become commonplace in just a few years, transforming outbreak response from reactive damage control into proactive prevention.”
“Take a Deep Breath. If You Dare.”
Robert Sullivan discusses Carl Zimmer’s new book, Air-Borne, in this New York Times book review: “‘Air-Borne” shows us how the scientific community came to understand that Covid-19 transmission was less akin to shots from a gun, and more like smog in a valley. To explain, Zimmer takes us through the history of aerobiology, and in his detailed and gripping account, he ascribes the reluctance of both the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization to a bias born of an ancient battle between two factions known as “miasmatists” and “contagionists.”’
“Did Horses Act as Intermediate Hosts That Facilitated the Emergence of 1918 Pandemic Influenza?”
Martin Furmanski and Pablo R Murcia published this article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases: “The ecological factors that led to the 1918 influenza pandemic remain unknown. We hypothesize that horses acted as intermediate hosts spreading a prepandemic avian-origin virus before 1918. This is supported by reports describing a large epizootic of unusually severe equine influenza beginning in 1915. Furthermore, the high horse demand during World War I resulted in one of the biggest equine mobilizations in North America between 1914 and 1918. This extensive movement of horses provided abundant opportunities for virus reassortment between prepandemic avian and human influenza viruses. Archived equine tissues or serum samples will be needed to test this hypothesis.”
“Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Respiratory Protection Handbook”
From CDC: “This handbook updates the original CBRN Respiratory Protection Handbook Publication No. 2018-166. It reflects new and emerging chemical and radiological hazards information identified during a recent hazard assessment conducted by NIOSH, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Defense. As a result of this hazard assessment, NIOSH expanded its CBRN APR Protection List to capture additional hazards that NIOSH Approved® APRs with CBRN canisters would provide protection against. The changes to NIOSH’s CBRN APR Protection List are captured in Chapter 2, Table 2-1. Additionally, changes in Chapter 3 reflect updates to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards involving respirators with CBRN protections.”
What We’re Watching 🍿
‘”I Just Wish We Could Tell a Story of What Works”: An Epidemiologist Reviews Outbreak Movies”
“Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center and Professor of Epidemiology at Brown University, reviews depictions of epidemics in Twilight (2008), The Last of Us (2023), Outbreak (1995), and Contagion (2011), and discusses how they relate to real public health systems today.”
Watch here.

ICYMI: Defense Meets Biotech – Cutting-Edge Frontlines: BI Webinar Replay
From Bloomberg: “The Department of Defense has placed special emphasis on Biotechnology as they fund critical emerging technologies that support manufacturing at the cutting edge. Dr. Kate Sixt discusses just how important this office really is to National Security and the efforts being made in this critical technology area.”
Watch this recording here.
The Second Annual State of the Science Address
From NASEM: “We invite you to join National Academy of Sciences President Marcia McNutt for the second annual State of the Science address, to be delivered on June 3 [3-5 pm EDT] in Washington, D.C. The event will explore the current status of the U.S. research enterprise and strategies for navigating a rapidly changing scientific landscape.”
“Register to Attend In Person or Virtually.”
What Does H5N1 Have to Do with the Prices of Eggs?
From NASEM: “The high cost of eggs has been one of the most visible societal impacts of H5N1 bird flu. First detected on U.S. poultry farms in February 2022 and in U.S. dairy cattle in 2024, the deadly bird flu strain has now spread to all fifty states. What are the risks to humans and susceptible animals, like cats? How are farmers coping with the disease, and what role do state and local officials play? How do costs along the supply chain translate to costs at the grocery store?”
“Join us for our second “Healthy Exchange” webinar in our Special Edition Bird Flu Series on June 3, 2025, from 1:00-2:30 PM ET for an informal discussion and Q&A with three animal health experts who will share their perspectives on managing the spread and impacts of bird flu.”
Register here.
International Pandemic Sciences Conference
“Representatives from academia, industry, civil society and policy are invited to gather in Oxford, UK, and online from 30 June – 1 July 2025 for the International Pandemic Sciences Conference 2025.”
“This year’s conference theme, Getting Ahead of the Curve, will explore how we can work together to predict, identify and control epidemic and pandemic threats globally. ”
“Over two days of plenary, parallel and networking sessions, stakeholders from different sectors and communities will have the opportunity to share ideas, experiences and strategies on prediction, early detection and control of pandemic threats. ”
“The International Pandemic Sciences Conference 2025 is hosted by the Pandemic Sciences Institute at the University of Oxford.”
Learn more, register, and submit abstracts here.
SBA.4 International Synthetic Biology and Biosecurity Conference in Africa
From SynBio Africa: “The SBA 4.0 conference will serve as a platform for fostering connections among industry, academia, community groups, and policymakers. It will showcase innovative applications of synthetic biology and AI, and highlight ongoing efforts in biomathematics, biomanufacturing, one-health, biosafety and biosecurity. It will also facilitate networking and information exchange. Key focus areas include tackling agriculture, health, environmental management, and industry challenges. In Africa, synthetic biology is poised to drive the national development agenda by promoting a sustainable bioeconomy, supporting health and agricultural systems, and aiding environmental conservation and restoration. This event will provide a vital opportunity for stakeholders to discuss and strategize the integration of synthetic biology innovations, address policy, legal frameworks, and communicate the benefits of the technology.”
This conference will take place July 23-25 in Kigali. Learn more and register here.
CTD-SPECTRE 2nd Annual Symposium
“The CTD-SPECTRE Symposium on Tropical and Emerging Infectious Diseases for Clinicians and Translational Scientists 2025 offers a unique opportunity to connect with global experts, gain cutting-edge insights, and collaborate with peers dedicated to infectious disease research and treatment.”
“Taking place September 16 -19, 2025, at the historic Grand Galvez in Galveston, TX, this immersive symposium will unite clinicians, translational investigators, and trainees to explore the latest breakthroughs in tropical and emerging infectious diseases.”
Learn more and register here.

New WHO Course on Dual-Use Research and Responsible Use of the Life Sciences
The WHO Academy has made available a new training course designed to deepen your knowledge and enhance your approach to dual-use research and responsible use of the life sciences. This course examines these dual-use research issues and discusses ways to identify and mitigate potential biorisks as part of a multi-sectoral and cooperative approach across the One Health spectrum that promotes the safe, secure and responsible use of the life sciences to prevent accidents, unanticipated and deliberate misuse of biological materials, knowledge and emerging technologies. The course is multifaceted, accessible, adaptable, engaging, and interactive for a wide range of One Health audiences. Biodefense Program director Dr. Gregory Koblentz contributed to the development of the course. It’s a free, self-paced 3-hour course with a certificate of participation upon completion. You can enroll in the course here.







