Pandora Report 9.25.2026: Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy, US Dual-Use Oversight & WHO Biorisk Education

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue examines ongoing international efforts to demilitarize Syria’s residual chemical weapons arsenal and seek accountability, community feedback on new U.S. implementation guidance for high-risk life sciences research, and new WHO global training tools on dual-use research oversight.


📢 Interested in Graduate Study in Public Policy, Biodefense, or International Security?

The Schar School of Policy and Government is hosting a series of upcoming Faculty Information Sessions for prospective master’s and graduate certificate students. These interactive sessions offer a direct opportunity to learn about curriculum structure, career pathways in biodefense and policy, and the student experience at George Mason University.

Virtual Briefing: Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy – Current Issues and Challenges

Fifteen years after the forces of deposed Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad used banned nerve agents outside Damascus, killing more than 1,200 people, Syria’s new government and the international community are working to address the deadly legacies of the civil war. The video recording for last week’s briefing on Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy: Current Issues and Challenges, moderated by Biodefense Program Director Dr. Gregory Koblentz, is now available online. Hosted in partnership with the Arms Control Association Inc., the panel features expert remarks from Amb. Katoub, former OPCW Director-General Amb. Ahmet Üzümcü, Fadel Abdulghany from the Syrian Network for Human Rights, and Richard Yates, the UK Deputy Permanent Representative to the OPCW on demilitarization, victim support, and accountability. Watch the full recording here.

Closing the Bird Flu Surveillance Gap

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

A recently published study led by Arizona State University professor Matthew Scotch, found that the D1.1 variant of H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b, the avian influenza strain driving the global bird flu outbreak over the last several years, circulated undetected in North American wild birds for roughly three months before it was first identified in September 2024. By comparing Arizona samples against thousands of viral sequences nationwide, the team traced the virus’s spread in a west-to-east pattern, moving from the Pacific Flyway into the Central, then the Mississippi, and finally the Atlantic, with each region shifting between acting as a source or sink for transmission over the course of the fall migration. Notably, the Arizona samples lack the Q226L mutation linked to a shift toward binding human-type receptors, though Scotch cautioned the virus is still continually evolving. This avian influenza strain has already caused human infections, including the first U.S. death linked to H5N1, in Louisiana in early 2025. Looking ahead to the next migration season, Scotch recommends sequencing unusual detections more rapidly, strengthening genomic surveillance in the weeks before and during migration, and connecting surveillance across wildlife, poultry, and mammals under a unified “One Health” framework, with regions sharing data in real time rather than waiting until infection numbers rise.

Despite the need to strengthen surveillance and rapid data reporting for bird flu, some experts note it is easier said than done. Alveo Technologies is nearing USDA approval for a barn-side test for poultry that delivers results in 45 minutes from a single throat swab. The device uses a chemistry process that skips some of the steps required for PCR and validation reports 100 percent specificity against 12 influenza A strains and 19 non-influenza organisms. Since February 2022, bird flu has hit nearly 2,000 U.S. poultry premises and cost more than 185 million birds. The technology is paired with a predictive tool, UC Davis epidemiologist Maurice Pitesky’s Waterfowl Alert Network, which predicts daily waterfowl abundance around commercial poultry farms using empirical bird flu detections, weather radar, satellite imagery and telemetry. However, accessible detection alone is not the issue, reporting is. Only about 1,500 of the roughly 160,000 farms covered by the Network have opted in, leaving data too coarse to connect individual farm outbreaks to nearby waterfowl activity. Pitesky noted it is a collective-action problem that could be better addressed by giving farms a secure, confidential channel to share their data with researchers and suggests USDA consider withholding indemnity payments from farms that refuse to share.

Further Reading: 


Crowdsourcing Feedback on US Dual-Use Research Oversight Policy

David Gillum, Research Assistant Professor at Arizona State University, and Rebecca Moritz have developed a preliminary white paper, “A White Paper on Developing Implementation Guidance for the United States Government Policy for Stopping High-Risk Life Sciences Research,” for which they are seeking input from the scientific, biosafety, biosecurity, research compliance, research administration, research security, and broader life sciences communities. The experience of these communities will be important in identifying where federal guidance needs greater clarity, where implementation may be difficult in practice, and where additional tools, examples, or approaches are needed. Their practical input is essential to developing guidance that is scientifically sound, clear, and workable across institutions. 

📄 Read the current version of the white paper here. The document is publicly available for viewing. David and Rebecca sincerely welcome proposed edits, additional examples, identification of gaps, alternative approaches, and other substantive comments. Anyone who would like access to comment can email David Gillum at David.Gillum@gmail.com.


WHO Academy Launches Online Training on Dual-Use Research and Responsible Life Sciences

With more than 1000 learners enrolled and 237 certificates awarded, the WHO Academy hosted a basic-level training course titled “Dual-use research and the responsible use of the life sciences,” which is helping professionals worldwide strengthen their understanding of biorisks, dual-use research oversight, and responsible research practices. Designed to be practical and interactive, this course equips researchers, laboratory personnel, policymakers, and regulators across the One Health spectrum with the knowledge and tools needed to identify, assess, and mitigate biorisks while promoting effective governance of dual-use research. 

🌐 The course is available free of charge in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Portuguese, Russian, and Spanish. Participants receive a certificate of completion upon finishing. Learn more and register via the WHO Academy here.


Schar School Faculty In the News

IN OTHER NEWS

AI Governance, Outbreak Response and Global Health

NEW: Singapore Conference on Mirror Life

Since the December 2024 publication of the Science article, Confronting risks of mirror life, and the associated Technical Report on Mirror Bacteria: Feasibility and Risks, scientific, policy, and other conferences have explored the feasibility and risks of mirror life. Now, nearly two years later, the Singapore Conference on Mirror Life brings together senior experts from Singapore and the broader international community to discuss the policy implications of mirror life.

This webinar will take place on Monday, September 28, 3:00-6:00 AM ET. Learn more and register here.

International Bio-Responsibility Conference 2027

Organized under the Bio-Responsibility Initiative at the Centre for Society and Policy (CSP), the conference brings together people to advance dialogue, build partnerships, and promote safe, secure, and responsible life science research, development, and innovation. The conference will host experts, policymakers, and practitioners around the world to discuss emerging biological risks and ways to strengthen responsible governance.

The deadline to register is September 30. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

Frontiers in Synthetic Biology: SpudCells, Mirror Life and Societal Implications

From the Consortium on Law and Values: “Advances in cell engineering and synthetic biology offer enormous potential benefits, while raising ethical and policy issues. SpudCell, the first synthetic cell that can grow and reproduce, built from non-living chemicals, was developed by a team at the University of Minnesota. Scientists have cautioned against creating organisms with molecules that are mirror images of the biological components of known life, as existing organisms would have no immune defenses. Join three experts on synthetic biology, biosecurity, and bioethics to explore how to realize the promise of synthetic biology while controlling potential risks.”

This webinar will take place on Thursday, October 29, at 3:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Director, Global Biological Policy and Programs – Job Opening

From the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI): “NTI – a nonprofit, nonpartisan global security organization focused on reducing nuclear, biological, and emerging technology threats imperiling humanity – is seeking a Director to join the Global Biological Policy and Programs team. The NTI | bio team is focused on reducing catastrophic biological risks, and we are working toward this goal by strengthening biotechnology governance; bolstering biosecurity in countries around the world; strengthening international capabilities to uphold the norm against bioweapon development and use; driving progress in Global Health Security; and building the biosecurity field.”

Learn more and submit your application here.

Pandora Report 9.18.2026: Bird Flu Returns as Ebola Persists

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue examines the renewed H5N1 activity as the fall season begins, the continuing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and emerging challenges shaping biosecurity and public health developments.


Bird Flu Cases Climb Across the Upper Midwest

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

Since September 1, federal animal health officials have recorded seven H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) detections in commercial poultry, concentrated in turkey operations across the Dakotas, Minnesota, and Idaho. Over the past month, roughly 360,000 birds have been affected nationwide, though this total largely reflects the mandatory culling of entire flocks required once a single case is confirmed, not mass die-offs from illness itself. The increase in detections aligns with the autumn uptick in waterfowl migration, when wild birds most often introduce the virus into commercial barns. Separately, two Idaho dairy cow herds were also confirmed infected. Fortunately, human risk still remains low. The CDC has recorded 71 cases nationally since 2024, nearly all among agricultural workers with direct animal contact, and no sustained person-to-person spread has been detected.

A Different Kind of Risk: AI and Pathogen Research

Although the current HPAI outbreak is primarily an animal-health issue, a recent Anthropic safety report offered a stark reminder that avian influenza remains high on the list of pathogens with pandemic potential. Some worry this risk could be compounded by AI assistance, though not all experts are as concerned. Anthropic disclosed that researchers attempted to use its Claude models to plan experiments that would make mutations in HPAI to help it adapt to mammals and transmit more easily. This was one of three pathogen-related cases the company flagged, which also included chikungunya virus and an unspecified orthopoxvirus. Two additional cases involved toxins. The researchers disguised their access through VPNs, intermediate servers, and disguised accounts, which Anthropic treated as a red flag.

Some security experts called the cases seriously alarming, though others disagreed. Virologist Kristian Andersen argued that much of the work resembled ordinary virology using mutations already found in nature rather than novel dangerous engineering. George Mason University’s own biosecurity expert Gregory Koblentz was similarly untroubled, noting that researchers using VPNs or other workarounds to access AI models is unsurprising given how indispensable these tools have become across scientific fields. He also was not surprised that the research was done at state institutions or labs with ties to the military, pointing out that the U.S. military itself “conducts and sponsors research on a range of infectious diseases that pose a potential risk to our troops.” Despite the mixed reactions, it is clear that Anthropic’s disclosure has value, as it shows how AI models are actually being used in biological research and provides real-world evidence about biosecurity risks that have until now been mostly hypothetical. Even skeptics of the report’s framing agree that it points to a risk that will need regulation down the road.

Further Reading: 


Ebola Outbreak in DRC Surpasses 7,000 Cases

The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has surpassed 7,000 confirmed cases and nearly 3,500 deaths for the first time since the epidemic began in May. The outbreak, which has now spread to a province in the northwest of Congolese territory, has become the country’s largest in recent years, prompting an intensified response involving disease surveillance, contact tracing, vaccination, and community engagement. Although health officials have reported signs that transmission is slowing, the World Health Organization (WHO) has cautioned that the outbreak remains far from over and that continued vigilance is needed to prevent further spread.


WHO Launches New Tool for Biorisk and Dual-Use Research Governance

The World Health Organization (WHO) has launched the Biorisk Implementation and Evaluation Tool (BRIET), a new resource to help countries and institutions strengthen governance of biorisks and dual-use research of concern (DUR/DURC). BRIET operationalizes the WHO Global Guidance Framework for the Responsible Use of the Life Sciences: Mitigating Biorisks and Governing Dual-Use Research by providing a structured, action-oriented approach to evaluating existing governance capacities, identifying strengths and gaps, prioritizing areas for improvement, and supporting ongoing capacity development. The tool generates capacity assessments, risk scores, and tailored key actions to inform decision-making and implementation efforts.


U.S. Public Health Is Under Strain

Last week, Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) released Underfunded and Under Strain: The State of America’s Public Health System, a new report examining how longstanding funding disruptions, severe workforce reductions, and institutional uncertainty during 2025 and 2026, have critically weakened the public health system’s capacity across the United States.  The report emphasizes that maintaining appropriations alone does not guarantee that public health programs can operate effectively, particularly when agencies also face staffing shortages, reduced institutional expertise, and administrative disruptions. The report features interviews with state and local health officials illustrating how federal funding and operational uncertainty complicate planning and compromise community response on the front lines. Click here for a fact sheet on the report.


BioGovernance Commons and China’s Role in Global Risk Governance

In this new volume, the authors address the critical question of how scientific collaboration can remain possible in an era of deepening geopolitical tension. Co-edited by Dr. Sonia Ouagrham-Gormley, Professor at George Mason University Schar School of Policy and Government, examines how scientific collaboration can persist amid growing geopolitical tensions.

Drawing on real transnational dialogue on biogovernance commons among scientists, ethicists, lawyers, and policy scholars, the book explores governance challenges of the life sciences spanning genetic data, biobanking, biosecurity, CRISPR, and global health, with particular attention to research cultures and regulatory dynamics in the United States, the United Kingdom, China, and beyond. The volume is available for pre-order now and is scheduled to be published on October 29, 2026.

IN OTHER NEWS

AI, Biotechnology and Biological Security

Chemical Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Security

U.S. Military Biodefense and Preparedness

Outbreaks, Emerging Infectious Diseases and Biological Preparedness

NEW: How do we Prevent Future Health Emergencies and Pandemics?

The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response will participate in several events during the 81st United Nations General Assembly (UNGA81), including discussions on pandemic prevention, preparedness, response, financing, and global health resilience. This event will bring together global health leaders and experts to examine persistent gaps between scientific knowledge and political action on pandemic prevention.

This event will take place on September 21 from 4:00-5:30 PM ET. Learn more and register for the in-person event here or follow the live stream here.

America’s Ebola Response: Travel Restrictions, Quarantines, and Citizen Rights

From The Pandemic Center: “As part of the U.S. response to the still-ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the Trump administration took unprecedented steps to block American citizens in the DRC from returning to the U.S., placing them on a “do-not-board” list until they spend at least 21 days in a third country. These travel restrictions, the quarantining and detainment of US citizens, and the construction of the facility in Kenya have spurred ethical concerns and even legal challenges.”

This webinar will take place on Friday, September 18 at 12:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Bioeconomy Summit

The Bioeconomy Summit, hosted by TechConnect, will bring together industry leaders, investors, federal officials, and experts to examine how the United States can strengthen and scale its bioeconomy. The summit will focus on aligning capital, policy, infrastructure, procurement, and industrial capacity; addressing vulnerabilities in biomanufacturing supply chains; and accelerating the deployment of bioindustrial technologies.

The summit will take place on Monday-Tuesday, September 21-22, at the National Harbor in Maryland. Learn more and register here.

Science of Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence for Life Sciences and Biotechnology Conference

From the National Academies: “This meeting brings together researchers and practitioners across various fields to define the emerging scientific method for artificial intelligence, focusing on benchmarks, leaderboards, challenges, and the evidence needed to trust systems that reason, act, discover, and operate in high-stakes domains, including the life sciences and biotechnology sectors.”

This conference will take place on Tuesday-Wednesday, September 22-23. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

The Second Bio-Responsibility Policy Lecture: “From Lab Safety to Bio-Responsibility: Building the Human Infrastructure for Safe and Secure Science.”

From organizers: “Advances in the life sciences are creating new opportunities for health, biotechnology, and economic development while also presenting increasingly complex biosafety and biosecurity challenges. The lecture will examine how institutions can develop practical, risk-based biorisk management systems, with a focus on the trained professionals and institutional capacity needed to translate policy into practice. It will also explore approaches to expanding biorisk management capacity through scalable training, competency development, and institutional support, including in resource-constrained settings.”

The virtual lecture will take place on Thursday, September 24, 8:00 AM – 9:15 AM ET. Learn more and register here.

International Bio-Responsibility Conference 2027

Organized under the Bio-Responsibility Initiative at the Centre for Society and Policy (CSP), the conference brings together people to advance dialogue, build partnerships, and promote safe, secure, and responsible life science research, development, and innovation. The conference will host experts, policymakers, and practitioners around the world to discuss emerging biological risks and ways to strengthen responsible governance.

The deadline to register is September 30. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

Frontiers in Synthetic Biology: SpudCells, Mirror Life and Societal Implications

From the Consortium on Law and Values: “Advances in cell engineering and synthetic biology offer enormous potential benefits, while raising ethical and policy issues. SpudCell, the first synthetic cell that can grow and reproduce, built from non-living chemicals, was developed by a team at the University of Minnesota. Scientists have cautioned against creating organisms with molecules that are mirror images of the biological components of known life, as existing organisms would have no immune defenses. Join three experts on synthetic biology, biosecurity, and bioethics to explore how to realize the promise of synthetic biology while controlling potential risks.”

This webinar will take place on Thursday, October 29, at 3:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Pandora Report 9.11.2026: 25 Years After 9/11 – Biodefense Then, Now, and What Comes Next

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue examines the evolution of U.S. biodefense 25 years after 9/11, the continuing debate over H5N1 vaccination, and the emerging applications of AI for detecting biological threats.


Join the Chemical Weapons Convention Coalition and Arms Control Association for a virtual briefing, “Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy: Current Issues and Challenges,” on September 16 from 11:00 AM-12:30 PM ET. The briefing will examine Syria’s ongoing efforts to address the chemical weapons legacy of the Assad regime. Gregory Koblentz, Director of GMU’s Biodefense Program, will moderate the discussion.



25 Years After 9/11: Remembering and Reflecting on the Evolution of Biodefense

By Carmen Shaw, Pandora Report Managing Editor

On the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attacks, the Pandora Report reflects on the lives lost, the attacks’ enduring impact, and how 9/11 and the subsequent anthrax attacks reshaped U.S. approaches to biodefense and national security. Source: Pexels.

Twenty-five years ago today, the United States experienced one of the most consequential terrorist attacks in its history. On September 11, 2001, nearly 3,000 people were killed in New York City, at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and in Pennsylvania. Thousands more were injured, and countless families, communities, and first responders have continued to live with the consequences of that day.

For the Pandora Report, September 11 offers an opportunity for both remembrance and reflection on how the attacks transformed the way the United States understands and prepares for modern security threats.

In the weeks following the attacks, letters laced with Bacillus anthracis spores were mailed to news media organizations and U.S. Senate offices, resulting in 22 cases of anthrax and five deaths. The 2001 anthrax attacks radically changed U.S. biosecurity and public health preparedness, including through the creation of the Federal Select Agent Program (FSAP) to regulate and oversee the use of dangerous biological agents that pose a threat to public, animal, or plant health.

Together, the September 11 and the subsequent anthrax attacks helped accelerate the development of the modern U.S. biodefense enterprise. They also triggered a broader transformation in homeland security, including the creation of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as well as the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act, which expanded government surveillance and law enforcement powers to prevent future terrorism.

Twenty-five years later, the threat landscape has continued to evolve. Emerging infectious diseases, advances in biotechnology, synthetic biology, artificial intelligence (AI), and the possibility of biological misuse present challenges that require many of the same capabilities that became priorities after 2001: early warning and biosurveillance, scientific expertise, interagency information sharing and coordination, and the ability to respond quickly when the nature of a threat is uncertain.

At its core, 9/11 is about the people who were killed and the families, first responders, service members, public servants, and communities forever changed by that day.

We remember those who were lost, honor those who responded, and reflect on our shared responsibility to build a safer and more resilient future.

Bird Flu Season Returns, So Does the Vaccination Debate

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

As the northern hemisphere begins to head into autumn, Bulgaria and France each confirmed their first H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks of the season. France’s case was notable because the affected ducks had already been vaccinated under the country’s mandatory H5N1 immunization program. This recent outbreak in France, alongside two articles published this week, reignites the question of the role of vaccination in H5N1 control and prevention efforts.

The first article, published in Poultry Science and Management by researchers in Egypt, tested six commercial H5 vaccines against currently circulating clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 and H5N8 strains in chickens. Most vaccines prevented death, with 75-100% survival compared to 100% mortality in the unvaccinated control group. However, none stopped birds from shedding virus for up to a week after exposure, and vaccines built on older or more distantly matched strains produced weaker protection. The authors concluded vaccination reduces mortality but, without regularly updated strains, still permits silent spread. Furthermore, use of suboptimal vaccines or inadequate vaccination programs may contribute to the selection of mutant strains through immune pressure, potentially reducing vaccine effectiveness.

The second, a Viewpoint article in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, asks why the US still does not vaccinate its poultry against H5 HPAI at all? The authors, from the University of Minnesota’s Secure Food Systems team, note that while effective vaccines, risk-mitigation frameworks, and risk-based surveillance systems already exist in the US, trade is the biggest issue. Vaccination plans could alter trade agreements, putting the US poultry meat and egg trade surplus at risk. There are also fears that products from vaccinated flocks could carry undetected, asymptomatic infections, leading to import restrictions. Traceability is another major hurdle. A vaccination program would require tracking which flocks were vaccinated and following their products through the supply chain. The poultry industry already does this for other purposes, like antibiotic-free labeling, but adapting those systems to a centralized, auditable, and validated process that trading partners will accept remains a barrier.

Vaccination is a valuable tool, but it isn’t a complete solution. Vaccinated flocks can still become infected and continue shedding virus, particularly when vaccine strains fall out of step with circulating field viruses. Meanwhile, in places where vaccine adoption has stalled, the holdup often has less to do with vaccine efficacy and more to do with economic concerns. Closing the gap on H5N1 will require progress on both fronts. Vaccine programs need to become more adaptive and be backed by surveillance and policy frameworks that give countries the confidence to actually use them.

Further Reading: 


DHS S&T Launches “Ready, Set… ID The Biothreat” Prize Challenge to Advance AI-Assisted Biodefense

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) has launched “Ready, Set…ID the Biothreat,” a prize challenge seeking AI-assisted algorithms for biodefense. The challenge is seeking innovative artificial intelligence approaches to help identify biological threats in complex environmental data. Eligible U.S. innovators, companies, academics, laboratories, and other technology developers over the age of 18 who are U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents can compete for up to $999,990 in prizes, with submissions due October 14, 2026. To learn more about the Challenge, visit the website here.


IN OTHER NEWS

Chemical Weapons & WMD Proliferation

AI & Biosecurity

U.S. Biodefense Policy and Institution & Funding

Global Health Security

NEW: America’s Ebola Response: Travel Restrictions, Quarantines, and Citizen Rights

From The Pandemic Center: “As part of the U.S. response to the still-ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the Trump administration took unprecedented steps to block American citizens in the DRC from returning to the U.S., placing them on a “do-not-board” list until they spend at least 21 days in a third country. These travel restrictions, the quarantining and detainment of US citizens, and the construction of the facility in Kenya have spurred ethical concerns and even legal challenges.”

This webinar will take place on Friday, September 18 at 12:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Exponential AI and Biotech Growth: Translating Technical to Policy – Workshop

From AI for SynBio: “The continued acceleration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), Biological Design Tools (BDTs), and Biological AI Models (BAIMs) has transformed the technological landscape, enabling tremendous benefits and potential misuse that could massively impact national security, defense, health, and economy. Mitigating this risk will require collaboration across Government, Industry, and Academia with both technical and policy focuses. Significant effort, especially at the federal level, has been made to raise awareness of this challenge, yet additional discussion is necessary to keep pace with the ever-evolving speed of this global technology.’

This workshop will take place from September 15-17 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC. Learn more and register here.

Bioeconomy Summit

The Bioeconomy Summit, hosted by TechConnect, will bring together industry leaders, investors, federal officials, and experts to examine how the United States can strengthen and scale its bioeconomy. The summit will focus on aligning capital, policy, infrastructure, procurement, and industrial capacity; addressing vulnerabilities in biomanufacturing supply chains; and accelerating the deployment of bioindustrial technologies.

The summit will take place on Monday-Tuesday, September 21-22, at the National Harbor in Maryland. Learn more and register here.

Science of Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence for Life Sciences and Biotechnology Conference

From the National Academies: “This meeting brings together researchers and practitioners across various fields to define the emerging scientific method for artificial intelligence, focusing on benchmarks, leaderboards, challenges, and the evidence needed to trust systems that reason, act, discover, and operate in high-stakes domains, including the life sciences and biotechnology sectors.”

This conference will take place on Tuesday-Wednesday, September 22-23. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

The Second Bio-Responsibility Policy Lecture: “From Lab Safety to Bio-Responsibility: Building the Human Infrastructure for Safe and Secure Science.”

From organizers: “Advances in the life sciences are creating new opportunities for health, biotechnology, and economic development while also presenting increasingly complex biosafety and biosecurity challenges. The lecture will examine how institutions can develop practical, risk-based biorisk management systems, with a focus on the trained professionals and institutional capacity needed to translate policy into practice. It will also explore approaches to expanding biorisk management capacity through scalable training, competency development, and institutional support, including in resource-constrained settings.”

The virtual lecture will take place on Thursday, September 24, 8:00 AM – 9:15 AM ET. Learn more and register here.

International Bio-Responsibility Conference 2027

Organized under the Bio-Responsibility Initiative at the Centre for Society and Policy (CSP), the conference brings together people to advance dialogue, build partnerships, and promote safe, secure, and responsible life science research, development, and innovation. The conference will host experts, policymakers, and practitioners around the world to discuss emerging biological risks and ways to strengthen responsible governance.

The deadline to register is September 30. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

Frontiers in Synthetic Biology: SpudCells, Mirror Life and Societal Implications

From the Consortium on Law and Values: “Advances in cell engineering and synthetic biology offer enormous potential benefits, while raising ethical and policy issues. SpudCell, the first synthetic cell that can grow and reproduce, built from non-living chemicals, was developed by a team at the University of Minnesota. Scientists have cautioned against creating organisms with molecules that are mirror images of the biological components of known life, as existing organisms would have no immune defenses. Join three experts on synthetic biology, biosecurity, and bioethics to explore how to realize the promise of synthetic biology while controlling potential risks.”

This webinar will take place on Thursday, October 29, at 3:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Pandora Report 9.04.2026: Biodefense Goes Local, H5N1 Hits Mink Farms, and AI Reshapes Bioweapons Risk

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue examines the growing importance of local capacity in biodefense, the detection of H5N1 on a U.S. mink farm, and emerging questions at the intersection of AI, biotechnology, and biological security. 


Join the Chemical Weapons Convention Coalition and Arms Control Association for a virtual briefing, “Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy: Current Issues and Challenges,” on September 16 at 11:00 AM-12:30 PM ET. The event will examine Syria’s ongoing efforts to address the chemical weapons legacy of the Assad regime.



The Elephant in the Room: Biodefense Goes Local—or Outbreaks Go Viral

By Carmen Shaw, Pandora Report Managing Editor

Figure 1. Fresh produce on display at a supermarket.
Source: Pexels.

Washington has long approached biodefense through a centralized, top-down approach, with federal agencies setting national priorities and strategies. However, recent outbreaks expose a critical vulnerability in that model: national biodefense is only as resilient as the local systems that carry it out. During this year’s cyclospora outbreak, Michigan investigators waited 12 days for Taco Bell supply chain records that a delayed FDA traceability rule would have required within 24 hours – a delay compounded by staffing shortages and an estimated $5.8 billion cut to CDC grant funding since last year. Meanwhile, Michigan was tracking more than 12,000 cyclospora cases while the national count stood at just 145.

The answer is not to abandon federal leadership, but to strengthen frontline capacity at the state and local levels. On Sep. 1, ASPR and NETEC announced a second round of STAND Awards, adding 21 hospitals across 16 states and territories to the National Special Pathogen System (NSPS), bringing the network to 75 facilities. In Bethel, Alaska, the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation has demonstrated how a tribal health system can build its own wastewater surveillance capacity, detecting influenza A up to 10 days before clinical data confirmed it and identifying rising COVID-19 and RSV activity. Uganda offers another example: during the 2026 Bundibugyo virus outbreak, the country met all three WHO 7-1-7 outbreak response benchmarks, detecting the outbreak in six days, notifying authorities in under one day, and completing early response actions within two days.

True biodefense preparedness requires federal leadership to actively strengthen state, local, tribal, and regional capacity, ensuring people and institutions are ready to detect and respond where threats first emerge.

Further Reading:


H5N1 Arrives on U.S. Mink Farms

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

The USDA confirmed avian influenza H5N1 on a Utah mink farm in mid-August, marking the virus’s first detection in a U.S. mink operation. Scientists have long flagged farmed mink as a potential pandemic risk as the size and density of the farms create a perfect environment in which the virus can mutate. An H5N1 outbreak in Spain in 2022 infected tens of thousands of minks and demonstrated the first documented evidence of mammal-to-mammal spread. Minks also have very similar respiratory systems to humans, creating conditions that researchers warn could help the virus evolve toward person-to-person transmission. Unfortunately, the concern isn’t purely theoretical. During the Covid-19 pandemic, mutated coronavirus strains circulated on fur farms across several European countries, and Denmark reported a dozen farm workers infected with a mink-linked variant that was less responsive to vaccines.

In addition to ethical and economic reasons, the zoonotic disease risk from farmed mink has already prompted most European countries to shut down or phase out fur farming. The U.S., however, has no federal ban on mink farming, and states including Utah, Wisconsin, and Minnesota still operate dozens of farms housing up to 12,000 animals apiece. Roughly 1.3 million pelts a year are produced in the U.S. for export, largely to Chinese fashion manufacturers. In response to the Utah detection, animal welfare groups are now pressing the USDA to phase out mink farming entirely, citing both the animal welfare concerns of the industry and its potential role as a breeding ground for the next pandemic virus.

Screwworm Zones Lifted in Texas

On a more encouraging note, USDA APHIS announced the release of two New World screwworm (NWS)-infested zones in Texas after coordinated surveillance, sterile fly releases, and livestock movement restrictions met federal criteria. It’s the first such release since the re-emergence of NWS in Texas in early June. The move lifts NWS-related movement requirements for producers in those zones, though other infested areas remain under restriction as the state-federal response continues. No new cattle infestations were detected in August in the U.S., but that does not mean NWS is disappearing just yet. Texas confirmed four new cases in domestic species in August: two in sheep, one in goats, and, most recently, in a dog detected on Monday, August 31st. Three of these cases remain active as of this week.

Further Reading: 


Schar School Professor Examines AI and Biological Weapons Risks

Dr. Sonia Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Associate Professor of the Biodefense Graduate Program at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government, examines the “de-skilling” narrative surrounding AI and biological weapons policy in a new article for the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. She argues that assessments of AI-driven biological threats often overestimate the ability of AI and other emerging technologies to lower barriers to biological weapons development while underestimating the importance of tacit knowledge, integration across stages of development, and the challenges of constructing durable sociotechnical systems. Ouagrham-Gormley calls for more empirically grounded threat assessments that consider the full bioweapons development process and inform targeted policy responses.


IN OTHER NEWS

Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Biotechnology

Public Health, CDC and Health Security

Emerging Infectious Diseases and Outbreaks

NEW: Bloomsday 2026

From Biotic: “Bloomsday 2026 will bring together researchers, ethicists, and policymakers to explore the emerging field of synthetic-cell engineering and the foundations needed to make the technology safe, reliable, and broadly accessible. The program will examine genome construction, computational tools, safety and security, dual-use risks, governance, and the ethical implications of engineered cellular systems.”

The event will take place on Thursday, September 10, 9:15 AM – 6:00 PM ET at the Science History Institute in Philadelphia. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Bioeconomy Summit

The Bioeconomy Summit, hosted by TechConnect, will bring together industry leaders, investors, federal officials, and experts to examine how the United States can strengthen and scale its bioeconomy. The summit will focus on aligning capital, policy, infrastructure, procurement, and industrial capacity; addressing vulnerabilities in biomanufacturing supply chains; and accelerating the deployment of bioindustrial technologies.

The summit will take place on Monday-Tuesday, September 21-22, at the National Harbor in Maryland. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Science of Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence for Life Sciences and Biotechnology Conference

From the National Academies: “This meeting brings together researchers and practitioners across various fields to define the emerging scientific method for artificial intelligence, focusing on benchmarks, leaderboards, challenges, and the evidence needed to trust systems that reason, act, discover, and operate in high-stakes domains, including the life sciences and biotechnology sectors.”

This conference will take place on Tuesday-Wednesday, September 22-23. Learn more and register here.

NEW: The Second Bio-Responsibility Policy Lecture: “From Lab Safety to Bio-Responsibility: Building the Human Infrastructure for Safe and Secure Science.”

From organizers: “Advances in the life sciences are creating new opportunities for health, biotechnology, and economic development while also presenting increasingly complex biosafety and biosecurity challenges. The lecture will examine how institutions can develop practical, risk-based biorisk management systems, with a focus on the trained professionals and institutional capacity needed to translate policy into practice. It will also explore approaches to expanding biorisk management capacity through scalable training, competency development, and institutional support, including in resource-constrained settings.”

The virtual lecture will take place on Thursday, September 24, 8:00 AM – 9:15 AM ET. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Frontiers in Synthetic Biology: SpudCells, Mirror Life and Societal Implications

From the Consortium on Law and Values: “Advances in cell engineering and synthetic biology offer enormous potential benefits, while raising ethical and policy issues. SpudCell, the first synthetic cell that can grow and reproduce, built from non-living chemicals, was developed by a team at the University of Minnesota. Scientists have cautioned against creating organisms with molecules that are mirror images of the biological components of known life, as existing organisms would have no immune defenses. Join three experts on synthetic biology, biosecurity, and bioethics to explore how to realize the promise of synthetic biology while controlling potential risks.”

This webinar will take place on Thursday, October 29, 3:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB)

From the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH): “The 28th PACCARB public meeting will explore how microbiome science can support AMR prevention, drive novel interventions, and build public awareness and understanding of microbiome-focused health measures. The meeting will focus on innovative and emerging topics in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the microbiome.”

This hybrid meeting will take place on September 9-10 from 9:00 AM–5:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Exponential AI and Biotech Growth: Translating Technical to Policy – Workshop

From AI for SynBio: “The continued acceleration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), Biological Design Tools (BDTs), and Biological AI Models (BAIMs) has transformed the technological landscape, enabling tremendous benefits and potential misuse that could massively impact national security, defense, health, and economy. Mitigating this risk will require collaboration across Government, Industry, and Academia with both technical and policy focuses. Significant effort, especially at the federal level, has been made to raise awareness of this challenge, yet additional discussion is necessary to keep pace with the ever-evolving speed of this global technology.’

This workshop will take place from September 15-17 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

International Bio-Responsibility Conference 2027

Organized under the Bio-Responsibility Initiative at the Centre for Society and Policy (CSP), the conference brings together people to advance dialogue, build partnerships, and promote safe, secure, and responsible life science research, development, and innovation. The conference will host experts, policymakers, and practitioners around the world to discuss emerging biological risks and ways to strengthen responsible governance.

The deadline to register is September 30. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

Pandora Report 8.28.2026: Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy, Bird Flu, and AI-Biosecurity

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights Syria’s ongoing chemical weapons legacy; Biodefense alumna Saskia Popescu and her work in global health security; emerging infectious disease threats, including H5N1 in Australian mammals and New World screwworm in Mexico; and the evolving landscape of AI-enabled biology and biosafety regulations. 


Join the Chemical Weapons Convention Coalition and Arms Control Association for a virtual briefing, “Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy: Current Issues and Challenges,” on September 16 at 11:00 AM-12:30 PM ET. The event will examine Syria’s ongoing efforts to address the chemical weapons legacy of the Assad regime.

Schar School Highlights Biodefense Alumna Saskia Popescu

The Schar School of Policy and Government profiled Dr. Saskia Popescu, 2019 Biodefense PhD alumna and current adjunct professor, highlighting her work in global health security, biosecurity policy, and outbreak preparedness. Popescu currently serves as CEO of the Global Health Security Network (GHSN), an Australian-based NGO dedicated to the detection, prevention, and control of infectious disease threats, and recently led the 4th Global Health Security Conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, which brought together more than 1,300 participants from 88 countries around the world. She continues to research biosecurity and resilience while teaching in the Schar School’s Biodefense program. Read the full profile here.

Figure 1. Dr. Saskia Popescu, Biodefense PhD ’19, leads the Global Health Security Network (GHSN) while continuing to teach and conduct research in biosecurity. Photo provided.

Bird Flu Reaches Australian Mammals

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

Australia’s H5N1 avian influenza outbreak has hit a new milestone as mammalian cases have been confirmed. A long-nosed fur seal was found dead on South Australia’s coast last week, marking the nation’s first mammalian case. The animal had no visible injuries and did not appear to be associated with other sick or dead marine mammals. Seals are especially vulnerable to avian influenza because they share coastal habitat closely with wild birds. Only days later, a red fox in suburban Adelaide became the first suspected case in a terrestrial mammal, likely infected after scavenging a sick bird. University of Sydney veterinary public health expert Michael Ward warned foxes could serve as a “bridge species,” potentially carrying the virus far inland to livestock like sheep. Australia’s red fox population is estimated at 1.7 million animals across 80% of the continent. More than 300 infection events have now been confirmed nationwide since the virus arrived in June, including deaths among ravens, penguins, terns, and gulls. Authorities are urging residents to leash dogs and keep cats indoors, while conservation sites like Cleland Wildlife Park begin vaccinating native birds. Fortunately, the virus has not reached Australia’s commercial poultry industry.

U.S.-Mexico Cattle Trade Resumes Despite Screwworm Concerns

The U.S. reopened its border to Mexican cattle this week, ending a year-long ban imposed due to concern for the spread of New World screwworm. Nearly 700 cattle crossed into Douglas, Arizona, on Monday, following a rigorous inspection procedure which includes RFID tagging and screening by specially trained screwworm-sniffing dogs. USDA chief veterinary officer Alan Huddleston called it a proof-of-concept protocol that could expand to more border crossings if successful. The reopening came just days after Sonora, the exporting state, reported its first screwworm case, though officials maintain the cattle pose no risk. Import volumes will scale gradually from 700 to 1,300 cattle daily. The ban previously pushed U.S. beef prices to record highs while forcing Mexican ranchers to sell domestically at steep discounts. Mexico currently has nearly 2,000 active screwworm cases nationwide, less than half of the infections reported a year ago, which authorities say shows progress in containing the outbreak.

Further Reading: 

Biodefense PhD Alum Chris Quillen Signs Book Deal

Dr. Chris Quillen, Biodefense PhD ’25, has signed a book contract with Routledge Taylor & Francis Group and its Contemporary Terrorism Series to publish his dissertation as The Critical Role of Scientists in Chemical and Biological Terrorism. His thesis argues that scientific personnel are the driving force behind terrorist efforts to develop chemical and biological weapons (CBW) rather than the leaders of terrorist groups. Although terrorist leaders may provide strategic vision, scientists often propose the idea of CBW programs to advance their own position within their groups. Once such programs begin, scientists—not leaders—select which CBW agents to pursue based on what they believe they can achieve, decide how best to pursue them based on what they know, and ultimately determine whether the effort succeeds or fails. Leaders play only a small part in these decisions. As a result, our current focus on targeting terrorist leaders is mistaken. Instead, efforts to prevent terrorist acquisition of CBW need to focus first and foremost on targeting the scientific personnel. Rather than treating scientists as non-combatant support personnel, these individuals should be targeted as active combatants like bombmakers and attack planners. The book will be available in 2027.

IN OTHER NEWS

Pandora Preparedness and Global Health Security

AI, Biotechnology, and Biosecurity

Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB)

From the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH): “The 28th PACCARB public meeting will explore how microbiome science can support AMR prevention, drive novel interventions, and build public awareness and understanding of microbiome-focused health measures. The meeting will focus on innovative and emerging topics in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the microbiome.”

This hybrid meeting will take place on September 9-10 from 9:00 AM–5:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Exponential AI and Biotech Growth: Translating Technical to Policy – Workshop

From AI for SynBio: “The continued acceleration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), Biological Design Tools (BDTs), and Biological AI Models (BAIMs) has transformed the technological landscape, enabling tremendous benefits and potential misuse that could massively impact national security, defense, health, and economy. Mitigating this risk will require collaboration across Government, Industry, and Academia with both technical and policy focuses. Significant effort, especially at the federal level, has been made to raise awareness of this challenge, yet additional discussion is necessary to keep pace with the ever-evolving speed of this global technology.’

This workshop will take place from September 15-17 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

International Bio-Responsibility Conference 2027

Organized under the Bio-Responsibility Initiative at the Centre for Society and Policy (CSP), the conference brings together people to advance dialogue, build partnerships, and promote safe, secure, and responsible life science research, development, and innovation. The conference will host experts, policymakers, and practitioners around the world to discuss emerging biological risks and ways to strengthen responsible governance.

The deadline to register is September 30. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

Horizon Fellowship

From Horizon Institute for Public Service: “Through our fellowship, we place fully-funded fellows at host organizations to help tackle policy challenges related to artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and other emerging technologies. Fellows selected for our program receive policy-focused training, mentorship, and support in matching with a host organization for a full-time, fully-funded fellowship based in the Washington, DC area. Fellows join a collaborative, close-knit community of public service-oriented experts. Potential host organizations include executive branch offices, congressional offices, national laboratories, and think tanks.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 30.

Asia Centre for Health Security (ACHS) Fellowship Programme

From ACHS: “The ACHS Fellowship Programme aims to inspire and connect the next generation of health security leaders and innovators. Launched in 2025 by ACHS, based at the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health (SSHSPH), National University of Singapore (NUS), the ACHS Fellowship Programme is a highly competitive, part-time fellowship that provides graduate students and early- to mid-career professionals with an opportunity to deepen their expertise, expand their professional network, and build leadership skills through educational opportunities and project work.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 31.

Pandora Report 8.24.2026: G20 Youth Diplomacy, H5N5, and Africa’s Health Security Index

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights reflections on the 2026 G20 Youth (Y20) Summit culminating in the G20 Youth Communiqué, emerging infectious disease threats including H5N5 and human screwworm infections, lessons from the Nuclear Threat Initiative’s Africa Health Security Index on strengthening health capacity and resilience, and the evolving landscape of biosafety, biosecurity, and AI-enabled biology.


Reflections on the 2026 G20 Youth (Y20) Summit: Realities, Global Consensus, and the Future of Diplomacy

By Carmen Shaw, U.S. Head Delegate for Food Security and Global Health (Y20 2026) | Biodefense PhD Student and Managing Editor, The Pandora Report

Figure 1. Over 100 global delegates convened in Washington, D.C., from August 11–14 for the 2026 G20 Youth (Y20) Summit. Delegates negotiated across five key tracks—global economy, energy, digital transformation, food security and global health, and conflict resolution—culminating in the 2026 G20 Youth Communiqué presented to G20 heads of state.

Over a week ago, more than 100 global delegates came together for the 2026 G20 Youth (Y20) Summit in Washington, DC. As the U.S. Head Delegate for Food Security and Global Health, participating in this summit on American soil during a period of profound political and economic transformation was both an honor and the responsibility of a lifetime. Hosted by Globally and the Young Professionals in Foreign Policy (YPFP), the summit culminated in months of rigorous multilateral negotiations among delegates, resulting in the publication of the 2026 G20 Youth Communiqué, which was formally presented to G20 leaders.

Figure 2. Delegates participate in multilateral negotiation sessions on policy proposals for the 2026 G20 Youth Communiqué report.

Containing 81 actionable policy recommendations, this communiqué offers a clear snapshot of global youth priorities across the global economy, digital innovation, energy, conflict and violence, food security, and global health. We did not shy away from hard or uncomfortable conversations; we engaged in them openly. Across these tracks, we debated frameworks for ethical AI governance, examined concrete pathways for securing energy supply chains, and pushed for Universal Health Coverage while prioritizing resilient healthcare financing. We also tackled deeply polarizing geopolitical issues, openly debating whether tariffs and economic sanctions can—and should—be used as tools of coercion in international affairs, while considering the legal protections required for displaced populations.

Throughout these negotiations, my objective was to ensure that high-level policy remained grounded in the realities facing communities and institutions. International frameworks have limited impact unless they protect and invest in the people who drive and depend on these global systems–farmers, workers, researchers, engineers, entrepreneurs, journalists, frontline healthcare professionals, humanitarian workers, and communities affected by conflict and displacement. Our experience demonstrated that effective multilateralism is built not on the absence of disagreement, but on deep empathy, strategic cooperation, and the willingness to find common ground.

There is no shortage of noise today about how divided our world has become, and America’s shifting role within it. Yet when you sit down at the negotiating table with young leaders from across the globe—doing the hours-long, painstaking work of reaching consensus across deep ideological divides—a very different story emerges. The future of international diplomacy and policy is stronger when young, empathetic, and pragmatic leaders step forward, listen openly, and work together to address the world’s most pressing challenges.

The channel between youth and our leaders is open. Our voices are unified, and the work of translating these policy recommendations into meaningful diplomatic action begins now.

Transmission Risk of Human H5N5

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

In a study published last week in the Journal of Virology, researchers evaluated the transmission risk of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAI) A(H5N5) following the world’s first confirmed human infection and fatality in November 2025. The patient, an older adult in Washington State with underlying health conditions, developed fever, confusion and worsening respiratory illness that required hospitalization and ultimately resulted in death. The patient kept a mixed backyard poultry flock, and environmental samples from the property tested positive for the H5N5 virus. No person-to-person spread was identified.

Testing the virus stain in human bronchial epithelial cells and in a ferret model, researchers found that the isolate replicated efficiently at human airway temperatures and caused fatal systemic disease but showed no capacity for airborne spread. Limited transmission occurred only with direct contact. Collectively, the results underscored the heterogeneity among clade 2.3.4.4b HPAI H5Nx viruses and the need for genotype-by-genotype evaluation of newly emerged influenza viruses to understand the public health risk.

The potential public health risk of HPAI is also at the forefront of the ongoing outbreak in Australian wildlife. Dr. Frank Wong, a Senior Research Scientist with the Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP) said the risk of bird flu spreading to humans within the country remains very low. He noted an “ecological perfect storm” would be required for the virus to spill over, though that does not mitigate the need to stay on high alert. Clinicians should still inquire about recent contact with potentially infected animals and should strongly encourage seasonal influenza vaccination, particularly as national flu vaccine coverage has fallen from 45.6% in June 2020 to 26.2% in June 2026.

Human Screwworm Infections Climb in Mexico

More than 500 people in Mexico have been infected with New World screwworm (NWS), a sharp rise in infections from last year. A recent study in CDC’s Emerging Infectious Diseases examined 202 confirmed Mexican cases from April 2025 to March 2026 and found that reporting rose from roughly three cases a week in 2025 to more than nine a week in 2026. Legs or feet were affected in 55% of cases, with others involving the nose, mouth and eyes. Six patients died, though only one death was directly attributed to the infestation.

Although Mexico was declared free of NWS in 2003, this recent rise in human cases is not unexpected given the northward spread of the parasite, which re-emerged in animals in Mexico in 2024. The same obligate parasite affects livestock, wildlife, companion animals, and humans, so a rise in animal cases indicates local circulation of the fly and an increased risk for concurrent human infestation. Thus, NWS is both a public health and animal health problem and calls for a One Health approach. Since the spread of NWS is expected to continue for the foreseeable future, the authors urge surveillance, diagnostic preparedness, animal movement controls, and fly-suppression activities to be implemented proactively at the leading edge of expansion, rather than only after human cases are detected. Coordination between human health, animal health, wildlife, and agricultural sectors will be essential to guide prevention and control measures.

Further Reading: 

Exploring Global Health Security Policy: My Summer Internship Experience with the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI)

By Alex Kyabarongo, MS Biodefense Student, George Mason University

Figure 3. Alex Kyabarongo is a second-year MS Biodefense student at George Mason University, with a special interest in global health security policy and biothreat reduction programs. He recently completed a summer internship with NTI, where he contributed to the Africa Health Security Index.

As the Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) outpaces containment efforts, with over 4,600 cases and more than 2,100 confirmed deaths as of August 12, the world remains more vulnerable to infectious disease threats than ever before. This outbreak—which experts say might be the deadliest Ebola outbreak yet due to its rapid spread—should serve as a stark reminder of the need to strengthen global health security programs. It should be a call to focus on improving disease surveillance capacities, biosafety and biosecurity, and other prevention, preparedness, and response efforts across the globe. Yet, this outbreak has occurred at a time when global health security financing remains fragmented, with shifts in international development assistance severely affecting health security programs in many countries, while the World Health Organization (WHO) Member States continue to face challenges in operationalizing the Pandemic Agreement.

It is such concerning global health security challenges that inspired me to enroll in the Master of Biodefense program at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, with the intention of deepening my knowledge and understanding at the intersection of health and security. With the same aspirations, this summer, I joined the Nuclear Threat Initiative’s Global Biological Policy and Programs (NTI | bio) team for a 10-week internship. This internship came at an important point in my graduate school journey, as I remain with only one semester left before graduation. It was an important time to put my classroom experience into practice, and many topics explored during the previous semesters helped me transition smoothly to working in this important field during the internship period.

With the NTI | bio team, I gained hands-on experience working on projects focused on countering health security threats and emerging technology risks. It was such a unique opportunity to learn from the NTI | bio team and contribute to ongoing projects such as AIxBio and DNA synthesis screening. Importantly, it was great timing that I joined when the team was working on the Africa Health Security Index (AHS Index). The AHS Index, which was jointly developed by the Nuclear Threat Initiative, the Brown University Pandemic Centre, and the Science for Africa Foundation, builds upon the previous Global Health Security Index framework to assess African countries’ health security capacities. Working on this project after having taken Dr. Scott Wollek’s BIOD 710: Health Security Preparedness class during the spring semester was highly relevant and enabled me to put the class theoretical principles learned from class into practice. For the AHS Index, I specifically worked on the risk environment category, exploring why its regional scores have continuously declined over the last three Index issues and the implications of this trend for the implementation of Africa’s health security capacities.

The AHS Index scores show that Africa’s health security capacities have improved by 9.1 points from 2021, with strong improvements in disease surveillance, prevention, and response capacities. The region has expanded laboratory capacities but still struggles with biosafety and biosecurity systems, which increases the risks of laboratory accidents and the potential misuse of biological materials. Similarly, dual-use research oversight and the culture of responsible science remain critically low, at 1.9 out of 100 across the region, which ultimately serves as an alarming call for regional health security leaders to strengthen Dual-Use Research of Concern (DURC) governance. Most importantly, the region’s political and security risks, infrastructure inadequacies, and environmental risks remain areas of vulnerability. For more on the Index launch, explore my recently published blog article, and to explore the details of the Index data, results and the recommendations, visit the Index website.

Internship programs are an important aspect of students’ professional development. I am glad that the Schar School of Policy and Government has such a supportive career development team that continuously supported me throughout my internship period. I even got academic credit for the internship! The internship was very enriching, and I gained invaluable practical experience, which ultimately complements and enhances my current graduate program experience and prepares me for new challenges. I benefited from the excellent mentorship and support of the NTI | bio team, who provided me with an opportunity to explore the topics they were working on, guided me, and provided important feedback.

One important lesson I gained was the importance of collaboration and teamwork, which were central components of the AHS Index project. I deepened my understanding of health security policy, the research needed to identify gaps to be addressed, the importance of partnerships, and how these elements come together to address global health security challenges. The current Ebola crisis in Central Africa serves as a significant reference point of how important it is to invest in health security preparedness, improve capacity, and, most importantly, make health security an integral component of national security. It is internship programs like this that build the next generation of global health security leaders.

Further Reading:

NIH Releases a Draft Biosafety Policy for Research Involving Biohazards for Public Comment

The NIH has released a Draft Biosafety Policy for Research Involving Biohazards (Biosafety Policy) for public comment as part of its effort to strengthen and modernize biosafety oversight. In September 2025, NIH announced plans to strengthen and modernize biosafety oversight and has since engaged stakeholders to inform the development of an oversight framework that addresses risk. NIH invites stakeholders to provide feedback on the Draft Biosafety Policy and associated templates via its online portal, with comments accepted until October 19, 2026.

IN OTHER NEWS

Vaccines, Immunization Policy, and U.S. Public Health

Ebola and Other Infectious Disease Emergencies

AI, Bioweapons, and Emerging Biological Threats

Biosecurity, Resilience, and Defense Strategy

NEW: International Bio-Responsibility Conference 2027

Organized under the Bio-Responsibility Initiative at the Centre for Society and Policy (CSP), the conference brings together people to advance dialogue, build partnerships, and promote safe, secure, and responsible life science research, development, and innovation. The conference will host experts, policymakers, and practitioners around the world to discuss emerging biological risks and ways to strengthen responsible governance.

The deadline to register is September 30. Learn more and register here.

Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB)

From the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH): “The 28th PACCARB public meeting will explore how microbiome science can support AMR prevention, drive novel interventions, and build public awareness and understanding of microbiome-focused health measures. The meeting will focus on innovative and emerging topics in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the microbiome.”

This hybrid meeting will take place on September 9-10 from 9:00 AM–5:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Exponential AI and Biotech Growth: Translating Technical to Policy – Workshop

From AI for SynBio: “The continued acceleration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), Biological Design Tools (BDTs), and Biological AI Models (BAIMs) has transformed the technological landscape, enabling tremendous benefits and potential misuse that could massively impact national security, defense, health, and economy. Mitigating this risk will require collaboration across Government, Industry, and Academia with both technical and policy focuses. Significant effort, especially at the federal level, has been made to raise awareness of this challenge, yet additional discussion is necessary to keep pace with the ever-evolving speed of this global technology.’

This workshop will take place from September 15-17 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC. Learn more and register here.

Biosecurity Simulation Exercise (BSX 2026): Laboratory Incidents & Deliberate Biothreats

From the Asia Centre for Health Security: “This table-top simulation exercise aims to enhance inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary preparedness for laboratory biosafety and biosecurity (LBB) and deliberate biothreat events (DBE). Through lectures, discussions, and structured, scenario-driven exercises, participants will explore decision-making to detect, risk-assess, and manage high-consequence biological incidents under conditions of incomplete information and unfolding events. Participants will collaborate in teams, building on expert perspectives to address issues in surveillance, diagnostics, public health response, security assessment, and risk communication.”

This in-person event will take place from August 27-28. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

Researcher, Built Environment Team – Job Opening

From Blueprint Biosecurity: “The built environment encompasses the indoor spaces where people work, learn, gather, and receive care. Equipping these spaces with additional layers of protection against infectious airborne pathogens can help reduce risk in these spaces and support safer, more resilient communities. This work will focus on identifying and advancing promising interventions to mitigate pathogen transmission in occupied indoor spaces and strengthen society’s ability to contain outbreaks before they become widespread. Blueprint Biosecurity is hiring up to two Researchers to work directly with the Built Environment Program Director to lay the groundwork for new areas of interest and expand Blueprint’s portfolio.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 21.

Respiratory Protection Program Officer, PPE Team – Job Opening

From Blueprint Biosecurity: “One of the most impactful ways to suppress pathogen transmission and save lives in a future outbreak is to ensure that highly protective respiratory PPE can be deployed to millions of critical workers on day one. Despite this, if a pandemic occurred tomorrow, U.S. stockpiles and supply chains would be unable to meet the demand. This problem motivated the development of the Blueprint for Pandemic PPE and has shaped our efforts to mobilize tens of millions of dollars toward advancing its goals. To build upon this momentum, Blueprint Biosecurity is hiring up to two Program Officers to expand our PPE team. These program officer roles are structured into two distinct tracks: Research Management or Grant Evaluation. Both positions will work closely with the PPE Program Director to help build a more resilient future in which critical workers have access to respirators during emergencies.

Learn more and submit your application here by August 21.

Horizon Fellowship

From Horizon Institute for Public Service: “Through our fellowship, we place fully-funded fellows at host organizations to help tackle policy challenges related to artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and other emerging technologies. Fellows selected for our program receive policy-focused training, mentorship, and support in matching with a host organization for a full-time, fully-funded fellowship based in the Washington, DC area. Fellows join a collaborative, close-knit community of public service-oriented experts. Potential host organizations include executive branch offices, congressional offices, national laboratories, and think tanks.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 30.

Asia Centre for Health Security (ACHS) Fellowship Programme

From ACHS: “The ACHS Fellowship Programme aims to inspire and connect the next generation of health security leaders and innovators. Launched in 2025 by ACHS, based at the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health (SSHSPH), National University of Singapore (NUS), the ACHS Fellowship Programme is a highly competitive, part-time fellowship that provides graduate students and early- to mid-career professionals with an opportunity to deepen their expertise, expand their professional network, and build leadership skills through educational opportunities and project work.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 31.

WHO Internship Programme

From WHO: “A competent and dynamic health workforce at the heart of each health system is essential to advance global health goals. Countries need a pool of health professionals trained and exposed to the systems and processes in the health sector and who understand how stakeholders interact within the international health arena. WHO’s Internship Programme offers a wide range of opportunities for students and recent graduates to gain insight into the technical and administrative programmes of WHO and enrich their knowledge and experience in various areas, thereby contributing to the advancement of public health.”

Learn more and apply here.

OpenAI Bio Bug Bounty Program

From OpenAI: “As part of our ongoing efforts to strengthen our safeguards for advanced AI capabilities in biology, we’re evolving our GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty to become an ongoing private program—the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program. The program will remain focused on universal jailbreaks that can defeat our predefined biosafety challenge against OpenAI’s frontier models, starting with GPT‑5.6 and going forward. The reward for a universal jailbreak for the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program has been raised from $25,000 to $50,000 for both GPT‑5.6 and GPT‑5.5. Smaller awards may be granted for partial wins at our discretion.”

Learn more and submit your application here.

Disarmament and non-proliferation of WMD – Training Program

From Asser Institute and OPCW: “By 2026, pressure on the international arms control system has reached a point few experts anticipated would arrive so quickly, driven largely by intense geopolitical fragmentation. There is a critical need for professionals who possess the legal, technical, and diplomatic expertise to navigate these modern complexities. This intensive five-day training provides a comprehensive, practical overview of the international non-proliferation and disarmament framework.”

This program will take place from October 26-30 in The Hague, the Netherlands. Learn more and register here.

Pandora Report 8.7.2026: Fauci Contempt Vote, AIxBio Threats, and One Health Fronts

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights continued congressional scrutiny of Anthony Fauci following his Senate hearing, ongoing One Health threats from H5N1 avian influenza and New World screwworm, and efforts to address the opportunities and risks of AI-enabled biology. The Pandora Report will be taking a break next week and will return on August 21, 2026.

Thank you for reading, and we look forward to sharing more updates with you soon!


Join the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) for a two-day workshop, “Preparing for a Future of AI-Enabled Biology,” on August 11-12. The event will explore emerging technology, key uncertainties, and priorities for strengthening global preparedness.

Fauci Faces Continued Congressional Scrutiny Over COVID-19 Response

Following last week’s Senate hearing, former NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci is facing continued congressional scrutiny over his role in the U.S. COVID-19 response. A Senate committee voted to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after he declined to answer questions about his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, citing his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The vote escalated a months-long dispute between Fauci and congressional investigators over questions related to COVID-19 origins, federal research funding, and pandemic decision-making. The proceedings followed the release of Fauci’s private COVID-era diary entries and additional records, including a copy of his government-issued phone. While critics have argued the materials raise concerns about transparency, fact-checkers have noted that they provide insight into Fauci’s personal experiences and frustrations during the crisis, but do not resolve ongoing scientific questions or debates surrounding COVID-19 origins.

Further Reading:

One Health on Two Fronts

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

Australia confirmed its first mass wildlife mortality from H5N1 bird flu earlier this week after more than 80 dead and sick greater crested terns were found on an island off South Australia’s south-east coast. Seventy-four cases have been confirmed nationally since June, mostly in South Australia, but fortunately no farms have yet been affected. In response to the recent mainland wildlife detections, the Australian government performed a risk assessment to better understand the potential impact on the country’s many species of native birds and mammals. More than 2,000 birds and mammals were listed from low to high risk based on their vulnerability and susceptibility, considering their habitat, ecology, behavior, and information from the global outbreaks.

Although the country’s biosecurity response has been excellent, Invasive Species Council CEO Jack Gough noted that funding to protect wildlife has gone backwards: “We won’t be able to stop bird flu spreading through wildlife, so the best response to that needs to be dealing with all the other threats. The foxes, the cats, the rats on islands, making sure wetlands are well connected, that we’re not seeing habitat destruction occurring in key nesting areas; that work hasn’t been happening at a scale which reflects the seriousness of this list.” Five seabirds, including the critically endangered Herald petrel, face extreme risk, meaning likely extinction if the virus reaches them, and more than 80 threatened species rank high or worse. Tasmanian devils, eastern quolls and several marine mammals would probably survive infection but with severely reduced populations. Vaccination requires two doses, which is impractical, if not impossible, in wild flocks, so trials are focused on captive breeding facilities.

Half a world away, Texas and surrounding states continue to battle New World screwworm. In an article published this week in Nature Ecology & Evolution, authors Andrews, Weese and Bogoch argue that the June 2026 screwworm re-emergence in Texas, the first overland US detection since the early 1980s, is the result of waning investment rather than any failure of the science. Sterile fly production and surveillance lapsed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a front pushed south over 47 years rebounded to the Texas border within only three. They acknowledge that this is a One Health problem, in which human and animal health are linked. Human myiasis is a real though comparatively uncommon problem; a huge economic toll is borne from livestock and companion animal infestations, and wildlife carry the biggest burden in sheer morbidity and mortality. The elimination of screwworms from the U.S. will require long-term, active effort to keep at bay, meaning infrastructure that must be funded, staffed, and defended indefinitely. Anything short of this sustained investment will only lead to continual re-emergence and subsequent animal and financial losses.

Prevention is invisible when it works. A sterile fly plant running at capacity and a seabird colony free of rats produce no headlines, which is precisely why the funding behind them erodes quietly. The gaps go unnoticed until they explode open, and by then the cost of response will be orders of magnitude higher than the sustained maintenance would have been.

Further Reading: 

IN OTHER NEWS

U.S. Public Health Leadership, Preparedness, and Trust

Global Health Security, Pandemic Preparedness, and International Cooperation

Biological Threats, Outbreaks, and One Health

Emerging Technologies and Evolving WMD Risks

Biological War: A Scenario

From investigative journalist Annie Jacobsen, this book explores the catastrophic consequences of a deliberate biological attack or laboratory accident, tracing how a rapidly spreading pathogen could trigger cascading failures across public health systems, government, critical infrastructure, and society.

Drawing on interviews with senior experts in national security, medicine, science, and the military, Jacobsen presents a fast-paced, scenario-based narrative that examines the hours, days, and weeks following the release of a biological agent. Like her bestselling Nuclear War: A Scenario, the book uses a fictionalized but research-informed account to highlight the challenges of biodefense, pandemic preparedness, and crisis response in the face of an existential biological threat.

Further Reading:

NEW: Army Mad Scientist Series with Dr. James Giordano – Lecture

From the Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS): “Join us for our virtual event, Braking Biowarfare: Deterrence Left-of-Denial featuring Dr. James Giordano, Head of the Center for Strategic Deterrence and Weapons of Mass Destruction Studies in the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense University. He will examine the need to shift contemporary biodefense beyond traditional reactive paradigms toward proactive strategies that prevent, delay, disrupt, and disincentivize the development and operationalization of weaponizable bioscience and biotechnology before their deployment.”

This virtual event will take place on Tuesday, August 18 from 12:00 PM-1:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB)

From the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH): “The 28th PACCARB public meeting will explore how microbiome science can support AMR prevention, drive novel interventions, and build public awareness and understanding of microbiome-focused health measures. The meeting will focus on innovative and emerging topics in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the microbiome.”

This hybrid meeting will take place on September 9-10 from 9:00 AM–5:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Exponential AI and Biotech Growth: Translating Technical to Policy – Workshop

From AI for SynBio: “The continued acceleration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), Biological Design Tools (BDTs), and Biological AI Models (BAIMs) has transformed the technological landscape, enabling tremendous benefits and potential misuse that could massively impact national security, defense, health, and economy. Mitigating this risk will require collaboration across Government, Industry, and Academia with both technical and policy focuses. Significant effort, especially at the federal level, has been made to raise awareness of this challenge, yet additional discussion is necessary to keep pace with the ever-evolving speed of this global technology.’

This workshop will take place from September 15-17 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC. Learn more and register here.

Biosecurity Simulation Exercise (BSX 2026): Laboratory Incidents & Deliberate Biothreats

From the Asia Centre for Health Security: “This table-top simulation exercise aims to enhance inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary preparedness for laboratory biosafety and biosecurity (LBB) and deliberate biothreat events (DBE). Through lectures, discussions, and structured, scenario-driven exercises, participants will explore decision-making to detect, risk-assess, and manage high-consequence biological incidents under conditions of incomplete information and unfolding events. Participants will collaborate in teams, building on expert perspectives to address issues in surveillance, diagnostics, public health response, security assessment, and risk communication.”

This in-person event will take place from August 27-28. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Researcher, Built Environment Team – Job Opening

From Blueprint Biosecurity: “The built environment encompasses the indoor spaces where people work, learn, gather, and receive care. Equipping these spaces with additional layers of protection against infectious airborne pathogens can help reduce risk in these spaces and support safer, more resilient communities. This work will focus on identifying and advancing promising interventions to mitigate pathogen transmission in occupied indoor spaces and strengthen society’s ability to contain outbreaks before they become widespread. Blueprint Biosecurity is hiring up to two Researchers to work directly with the Built Environment Program Director to lay the groundwork for new areas of interest and expand Blueprint’s portfolio.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 21.

NEW: Respiratory Protection Program Officer, PPE Team – Job Opening

From Blueprint Biosecurity: “One of the most impactful ways to suppress pathogen transmission and save lives in a future outbreak is to ensure that highly protective respiratory PPE can be deployed to millions of critical workers on day one. Despite this, if a pandemic occurred tomorrow, U.S. stockpiles and supply chains would be unable to meet the demand. This problem motivated the development of the Blueprint for Pandemic PPE and has shaped our efforts to mobilize tens of millions of dollars toward advancing its goals. To build upon this momentum, Blueprint Biosecurity is hiring up to two Program Officers to expand our PPE team. These program officer roles are structured into two distinct tracks: Research Management or Grant Evaluation. Both positions will work closely with the PPE Program Director to help build a more resilient future in which critical workers have access to respirators during emergencies.

Learn more and submit your application here by August 21.

NEW: Horizon Fellowship

From Horizon Institute for Public Service: “Through our fellowship, we place fully-funded fellows at host organizations to help tackle policy challenges related to artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and other emerging technologies. Fellows selected for our program receive policy-focused training, mentorship, and support in matching with a host organization for a full-time, fully-funded fellowship based in the Washington, DC area. Fellows join a collaborative, close-knit community of public service-oriented experts. Potential host organizations include executive branch offices, congressional offices, national laboratories, and think tanks.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 30.

NEW: Asia Centre for Health Security (ACHS) Fellowship Programme

From ACHS: “The ACHS Fellowship Programme aims to inspire and connect the next generation of health security leaders and innovators. Launched in 2025 by ACHS, based at the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health (SSHSPH), National University of Singapore (NUS), the ACHS Fellowship Programme is a highly competitive, part-time fellowship that provides graduate students and early- to mid-career professionals with an opportunity to deepen their expertise, expand their professional network, and build leadership skills through educational opportunities and project work.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 31.

WHO Internship Programme

From WHO: “A competent and dynamic health workforce at the heart of each health system is essential to advance global health goals. Countries need a pool of health professionals trained and exposed to the systems and processes in the health sector and who understand how stakeholders interact within the international health arena. WHO’s Internship Programme offers a wide range of opportunities for students and recent graduates to gain insight into the technical and administrative programmes of WHO and enrich their knowledge and experience in various areas, thereby contributing to the advancement of public health.”

Learn more and apply here.

OpenAI Bio Bug Bounty Program

From OpenAI: “As part of our ongoing efforts to strengthen our safeguards for advanced AI capabilities in biology, we’re evolving our GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty to become an ongoing private program—the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program. The program will remain focused on universal jailbreaks that can defeat our predefined biosafety challenge against OpenAI’s frontier models, starting with GPT‑5.6 and going forward. The reward for a universal jailbreak for the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program has been raised from $25,000 to $50,000 for both GPT‑5.6 and GPT‑5.5. Smaller awards may be granted for partial wins at our discretion.”

Learn more and submit your application here.

Disarmament and non-proliferation of WMD – Training Program

From Asser Institute and OPCW: “By 2026, pressure on the international arms control system has reached a point few experts anticipated would arrive so quickly, driven largely by intense geopolitical fragmentation. There is a critical need for professionals who possess the legal, technical, and diplomatic expertise to navigate these modern complexities. This intensive five-day training provides a comprehensive, practical overview of the international non-proliferation and disarmament framework.”

This program will take place from October 26-30 in The Hague, the Netherlands. Learn more and register here.

Pandora Report 7.3.2026

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights lessons from a contested logistics wargame on integrating biodefense into military planning, Australia’s response to its first mainland H5N1 detection and the continued spread of New World screwworm, a new tool to strengthen chemical weapons nonproliferation, and a review challenging the use of “gain-of-function” as a category for identifying research of biosecurity concern.  

When the Supply Chain Becomes the Battlefield — Biodefense Lessons from the Contested Logistics Wargame 

Figure 1. The Contested Logistics Wargame II (CLW-II), hosted by Thomas Strategy Consulting, convened May 14-15, 2026, at the National Defense University (NDU) in Washington, D.C. Figure 2. Sandra Roshonda Thomas (right), current MS student in GMU’s Biodefense program and founder of Thomas Strategy Consulting, connects with a wargame participant at NDU.

By Sandra Roshonda Thomas, current MS Biodefense student and Founder of Thomas Strategy Consulting

The United States’ national security strategy has long been shaped by decades of policy passed down by different administrations in response to changing geopolitical threats. Wargames and tabletop exercises were born out of the necessity to look at issues and concerns. Many military exercises have focused on asymmetric warfare, irregular actors, and counterterrorism operations.  While that emphasis was not misplaced, it has also created an institutional blind spot: planning for crises in which great-power conflict and biological emergencies occur simultaneously. These two threats do not occupy a separate strategic lane. They share the same physical infrastructure, decision-making systems, and industrial supply chains. Crucially, the logistics enterprise required to sustain joint military operations in a contested Pacific or European theater is the same enterprise needed to surge medical countermeasures, evacuate casualties, and shore up public health infrastructure during a biological emergency. The Contested Logistics Wargame II (CLW-II), hosted by Thomas Strategy Consulting, was among the first structured exercises to formally and deliberately place these two worlds — defense logistics and health security —within the same strategic framework. What it revealed deserves the full attention of the biodefense community. 

From May 14-15, 2026, CLW-II convened at the National Defense University (NDU) in Washington, D.C., marking the second iteration of a wargaming series built specifically to stress-test joint logistics assumptions under near-peer adversary pressure. Far from a conventional tabletop, this structured, scenario-driven wargame brought together a diverse cohort of participants across the national security enterprise: senior leaders and operators from the Departments of War and Defense (DoD), defense industry partners, interagency officials, and academia. Most notably, CLW-II also integrated health and medical sector professionals into the design, intentionally bringing underrepresented equities directly into core defense planning.  

The exercise unfolded across five sequential turns, each escalating in complexity and building upon prior assumptions and outcomes. This structure approximated the cognitive and institutional demands of an actual crisis, forcing participants into a simulated high-pressure environment. The scenario’s final state presented a deliberate intersection of challenges: management of active military operations alongside an emerging biological incident affecting homeland infrastructure and the military health system. This dual-stress design was a consequential architectural choice — a recognition that the most dangerous crises are not the ones we plan for in isolation, but the ones that arrive when we least expect them. 

Situating CLW-II within the current policy landscape reveals why its findings are so critical for the biodefense community. The DoD relies on the United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM), a functional, unified command that provides air, land, and sea transportation to the force in times of need. This dependence reflects decades of forced optimization for the army forces rather than a deliberate strategic preference. This optimization has bred a significant vulnerability. Commercial logistics networks are primary targets for sophisticated adversaries in the opening phases of conflict, and they are equally vulnerable to the shocks accompanying large-scale public health emergencies. The COVID-19 pandemic made this vulnerability undeniable: medical supply chains that appeared adequate under normal operating conditions collapsed under the strain of a global health emergency that was not even paired with active military conflict. CLW-II exposed a planning gap that the biodefense community has long suspected but rarely examined at the operational level: the near-total absence of integrated planning frameworks that treat military logistics and medical countermeasure distribution as components of a single, unified enterprise. Today, these planning functions exist in siloed domains, governed by disparate local, state, and federal authorities, and supported by separate resource streams — an arrangement that may be administratively convenient but is operationally untenable when both demands materialize simultaneously. The wargame demonstrated this friction across multiple turns, forcing players to manage massive, concurrent civilian and military medical demands. 

From a biodefense perspective, the most consequential design element of CLW-II was what exercise architects called the “health resilience layer” — a scenario injection that transformed the final turn from a conventional contested logistics problem into something considerably more complex and revealing. Set at Day +8 of the scenario timeline, this turn confronted participants with simultaneous adversary attacks on CONUS airport facilities across multiple cities alongside an emerging biological incident, placing acute stress on both homeland defense logistics and the military health system. The demands were not sequential. Teams could not address the military logistics problem first and then pivot to the public health emergency; in this scenario — as in reality — the two crises fed on each other, competing for the same finite resources, legal authorities, and decision-making bandwidth. The biological component exposed several previously unexamined gaps at the civil-military interface. When military logistics infrastructure is already degraded by adversary action, who holds legal and operational authority over medical countermeasure distribution? How does the Defense Logistics Agency coordinate with civilian public health authorities — the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), state health departments, and regional emergency management — if the airports and distribution nodes that both entities rely upon are simultaneously under kinetic or non-kinetic attack? These are not hypothetical questions engineered for academic discussion. They are live planning gaps with life-or-death consequences that CLW-II made visible and discussable at an unprecedented level of operational specificity. 

Although structured wargaming is not traditionally recognized as a standard biodefense methodology, the community has a profound stake in the findings of CLW-II. Traditional public health preparedness often relies on a deeply flawed foundational assumption: that the military logistics infrastructure and commercial supply chains required for emergency distribution will remain largely intact and available during wartime. CLW-II inverts this assumption entirely. It challenges the institutional tendency to relegate medical equities to the periphery of defense planning by exposing a stark reality: stockpiling countermeasures is a meaningful preparedness investment, but it is only half the battle. A robust inventory becomes functionally irrelevant if the distribution networks required to move these life-saving commodities from storage to communities are compromised by an adversary. As currently designed, the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) relies on a secure domestic transit infrastructure that may not exist in a near-peer conflict. Furthermore, the assumption that military assets and capabilities will be available to support civilian public health operations during a simultaneous crisis requires an urgent, systematic re-examination. CLW-II did not resolve these deep systemic vulnerabilities, but it created conditions under which they could no longer be avoided. For the future of wargaming, this type of scenario needs to be tested, and policies need to be developed. 

Beyond its immediate policy implications, CLW-II offers a broader methodological argument for the biodefense research and education community. While our field is anchored by rigorous modeling and careful policy analysis, structured wargaming introduces a fundamentally different layer of insight. By placing decision-makers under escalating pressure and forcing real-time resource allocation choices against an actively adaptive opponent, wargaming surfaces the cognitive friction, institutional seams, authority ambiguities, and communication breakdowns inherent to crisis management — vulnerabilities that static analysis and consensus-driven tabletops fail to capture. The operational friction revealed in CLW-II’s final turn, as teams struggled to reconcile competing authorities amidst collapsing assumptions, yielded knowledge that no traditional policy paper could replicate. As both the founder of Thomas Strategy Consulting and a current Master’s student in Biodefense at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University (GMU), I see a clear need for this approach. There is a compelling case for integrating structured wargaming into both the research agenda and graduate curricula of biodefense programs, particularly on topics that sit at the precarious intersection of health security and national defense logistics. The methodological investment is modest; the analytical return is significant. 

The findings of CLW-II yield three urgent, policy-forward recommendations for the biodefense community, policymakers, and academia. First, the United States requires a joint DoD–HHS–DHS planning framework that explicitly integrates medical countermeasure logistics into contested military logistics doctrine. Treating these as parallel tracks rather than components of a single enterprise —sharing physical infrastructure, transit assets, and decision-making authorities— is a profound strategic liability that current iterations of the National Biodefense Strategy fail to adequately rectify. Second, future exercises must expand the participation of health sector professionals, including medical logistics specialists, public health planners, and biodefense scholars. In my experience from being at the Pentagon, high-level wargaming historically glosses over logistics, and the medical field is sidelined even further. Excluding these experts leaves defense planning products with dangerous blind spots; after all, the contested sustainment crisis is fundamentally a health security problem, and it should be treated as such.  

Lastly, academic institutions like GMU’s Biodefense program, along with peers across the national biodefense academic community, should engage directly with the CLW series and similar defense wargaming venues, not merely as observers but as active contributors and researchers. The intersection of logistics resilience and health security is an emerging field that urgently needs voices trained in both disciplines to bridge the analytical and institutional gap that CLW-II exposed. The exercise demonstrated something that the biodefense community should inscribe in its collective planning consciousness: when the supply chain becomes the battlefield, biodefense is no longer a separate domain — it is the center of gravity. 

Australia Locks Down for Bird Flu 

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

As Australia responds to its first detection of H5N1 bird flu on the mainland, Agriculture Minister Julie Collins provided reassurance that the country is well prepared, pointing to investments in national response arrangements: “We take the risks of H5 bird flu seriously which is why our government has invested more than $113 million to strengthen our nation’s preparedness. Australia’s response is designed to manage the risks of H5 bird flu, to protect poultry production, and reduce impacts on wildlife and communities.”  

Minimizing the impact of bird flu on wildlife is a critical goal for the country following devastating outbreaks in Australia’s sub-Antarctic territories. Research from Heard Island, about 2500 miles south-west of Australia, estimates that H5N1 has killed roughly 13,000 of 17,000 southern elephant seal pups since last August. Researchers also confirmed King and gentoo penguins and Antarctic fur seals tested positive. Environment Minister Murray Watt called the deaths “sobering” and warned against complacency as the virus moves to the mainland. 

Meanwhile, commercial poultry producers have acted quickly to increase biosecurity. Inghams Group, one of Australia’s largest poultry companies, locked down all its Western Australian farms and processing sites and banned non-essential access, even though its operations sit almost 700 km from the detection site. The company is also seeking approval to house free-range flocks indoors to further mitigate against any potential risks. 

Screwworm Spreads in Texas as Other States Tighten Restrictions 

The New World screwworm outbreak has grown to 31 confirmed cases nationwide as of July 1 (21 active, 10 inactive). Texas accounts for 30 of them, alongside one now-inactive case in New Mexico, and officials have quarantined parts of 21 Texas counties. The most recent cases include sheep, cattle, and the state’s first infected dog. 

Several states, including New Jersey,  Maine, Missouri, and Minnesota, have responded by tightening import requirements for pets and domestic animals to prevent introduction of the parasite. Restrictions vary including requirements for certificates of veterinary inspection prior to arrival, quarantine periods, and treatment with EPA- or FDA-approved external parasite products. Texas localities are acting pre-emptively too. Blanco County has issued a local disaster declaration despite having no confirmed cases itself, though neighboring Gillespie County confirmed an infected goat in early June. A county judge noted the measure gives officials more flexibility and will allow them to move more quickly if a case is identified. For instance, the county could utilize its own property for animal disposal to support local producers. 

The USDA marked the opening of the new sterile fly production plant in southern Mexico on June 27, with the goal of producing an additional 30 million sterile flies within 8 weeks and 100 million by this fall to help slow the spread.    

Further Reading:  

New Chemical Weapon Nonproliferation Tool Unveiled 

Dr. Stefano Costanzi at American University has released CMF-CW (Chemical Match Finder for Chemical Weapons Control Lists) to enhance efforts to prevent the proliferation of chemical weapons. The complexity and variability of chemical nomenclature, as well as the vastness of chemical space, can make it challenging and time-consuming to determine whether a given substance is covered by these lists. CMF-CW is a free, publicly available web application that helps users determine whether a chemical name or another text-based input – such as a text string representing a chemical structure or a chemical database identifier – corresponds to a substance covered by chemical-weapons-related control lists.  CMF-CW uses these inputs to check against the Chemical Weapons Convention Schedules, the Australia Group Chemical Weapons Precursors list, and the Wassenaar Arrangement Munitions List 7. It then reports whether the corresponding substance matches any of the entries in these control lists.  In addition to the application itself, the website includes help pages and video presentations explaining what the CMF-CW does, how to use it, and how it works. Free webinars for those interested in learning more about CMF-CW will be held on June 30, July 1, and July 2. If you would like to participate, please fill out this form and indicate the date of your choice.  A webinar link will be sent to you once your registration has been confirmed. Spaces are limited and available on a first-come, first-served basis. 

Review Challenges Use of “Gain-of-Function” as a Biosecurity Category 

A new review in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology argues that the term “gain-of-function” is an unreliable proxy for identifying research of biosecurity concern. After reviewing over 20,000 publications referencing gain-of-function research, the authors found that the vast majority involved non-microbial studies, such as human genetics and cancer biology, while only 15 papers met the federal criteria for dangerous gain-of-function (DGoF) research. Conversely, most research that would qualify as DGoF never used the term “gain of function” at all. The authors conclude that oversight should focus on the biological functions of sequences of concern—rather than terminology—to better identify genuinely high-risk research and improve the consistency of biosecurity governance. 

IN OTHER NEWS 

AI, Biotechnology, and Biosecurity  

Ebola Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo 

Vaccines, Immunization, and Public Health 

Chemical Weapons 

Supporting Responsible Innovation of Synthetic Cells: Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Environmental Considerations 2026  

In a new consensus study report, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) examines the opportunities and governance challenges posed by advances in synthetic cell research. The report finds that while many biosafety, biosecurity, and environmental risks associated with synthetic cells are comparable to those of existing chemical and microbial systems, their novel architectures, engineered capabilities, and expanding applications may introduce new uncertainties for risk-benefit evaluation and oversight. To support responsible innovation, the report outlines a coordinated national biotechnology governance strategy that includes strengthening the scientific evidence base for risk assessment, modernizing biosafety and biosecurity oversight, and promoting transparency, public engagement, and international collaboration.  

NEW: Jessica T. Mathews New Voices Conference  

From Carnegie Endowment: “Rising great power tensions, the end of arms control, renewed proliferation risks, and the expansion of nuclear energy all underscore the urgency of this moment. Developing the new ideas, skills, and perspectives needed to manage nuclear dangers into the future requires engaging talented individuals from a variety of backgrounds and disciplines. 

The Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is pleased to be hosting its third Jessica T. Mathews New Voices conference on Wednesday, July 8, 2026. The conference will be held in person at Carnegie’s headquarters in Washington, D.C., with the keynote available for registered participants online.  

This one-day event for interns, students, and young professionals will provide substantive policy discussions with guest speakers, opportunities for networking and mentorship, and an interactive nuclear session.” 

This event will take place on Wednesday, July 8, from 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM (EDT). Learn more and register here.  

NEW: Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series 

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.” 

Sessions of the workshop series will take place on July 16, July 21, and July 28, followed by a capstone session on September 23. Learn more and register here. 

NEW: Tracking Health Security Progress and Building Resilience in Africa – A Webinar 

From the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI): “The world is shifting from a period of urgent health actions to one of vast growing neglect, even as biological threats continue to rise. Against this backdrop, the 2026 Africa Health Security Index shows great progress has been made across the continent – but substantial gaps remain. 

Join NTI, the Brown University Pandemic Center, Economist Enterprise, and the Science for Africa Foundation for a discussion of the findings and recommendations of the 2026 Africa Health Security (AHS) Index, an independent assessment of health security capacities in Africa. 

This webinar will convene global experts and policymakers to discuss how the AHS Index can shape policy decision-making and drive meaningful action to strengthen health security capacities and improve preparedness for future epidemics and pandemics.” 

This webinar will take place on July 29 from 3:30 – 5:00 PM EAT (8:30 AM – 10:00 AM ET). Learn more and register here. 

Preparing for a Future of AI-Enabled Biology 

From the National Academy of Medicine (NAM): “Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the life sciences, including how researchers study biology, develop vaccines and treatments, and detect disease outbreaks. While these advances could improve public health and preparedness, they also raise important questions about safety, security, and the possibility of misuse. 

To better understand these issues, the National Academy of Medicine, in collaboration with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and with support from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), will convene a two-day workshop on preparing for the future of AI-enabled biology. 

The workshop will bring together experts from public health, medicine, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, biosecurity, government, and industry to explore how AI-enabled biological risks may evolve over the next decade.” 

This hybrid event will take place on August 11-12, 2026. Learn more and register here.

Ninth Session of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Biological Weapons Convention  

From the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA): “We will convene the Ninth Session of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). Chaired by Ambassador Frederico S. Duque Estrada Meyer of Brazil, the meeting will bring together State Parties, international organizations, academic institutions, and civil society representatives to continue discussions on strengthening the Convention and advancing efforts to address biological threats. Public sessions will be webcast through UN Web TV, and side events are expected throughout the week.  

This event will take place from August 17-21 at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. Learn more and register by July 31 here.  

Biosecurity Simulation Exercise (BSX 2026): Laboratory Incidents & Deliberate Biothreats 

From the Asia Centre for Health Security: “This table-top simulation exercise aims to enhance inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary preparedness for laboratory biosafety and biosecurity (LBB) and deliberate biothreat events (DBE). Through lectures, discussions, and structured, scenario-driven exercises, participants will explore decision-making to detect, risk-assess, and manage high-consequence biological incidents under conditions of incomplete information and unfolding events. Participants will collaborate in teams, building on expert perspectives to address issues in surveillance, diagnostics, public health response, security assessment, and risk communication.” 

This in-person event will be held from August 27-28. Learn more and register here. 

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’ 

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).” 

This in-person event will be held from October 12 – 16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here. 

Pandora Report 6.26.2026

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights key takeaways from the 4th Global Health Security Conference 2026 in Kuala Lumpur, alongside outbreak updates on Australia’s first detections of H5N1 avian influenza and rising New World screwworm cases in Texas. It also features new research on scientific advocacy and dissent in China and Russia, as well as upcoming biosecurity, AI-enabled biology, and dual-use research training and policy events.  

Highlights from the 4th Global Health Security Conference 2026 

By Dara Russell, MPH, Biodefense Ph.D. Student 

Figure 1. The #GHS2026 conference welcomed approximately 1,300 delegates from 88 countries in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, from June 9-12, 2026, to discuss emerging global health security challenges. 

This year, I had the privilege of attending the 4th Global Health Security Conference from 9-12 June 2026 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Hosted by the Global Health Security Network (GHSN), the conference brought together approximately 1,300 global leaders, researchers, practitioners, and policymakers from 88 countries to exchange knowledge and ideas, strengthen global partnerships, and shape the future of health security.  

Opening the conference, Dr. Saskia Popescu, CEO of GHSN and a GMU Biodefense Ph.D. ’19 alumna emphasized that the current Ebola outbreak is a reminder that global health security is being tested like never before. Infectious diseases do not respect national borders, she noted, but instead act as bridges in an increasingly interconnected world, making health security a shared global responsibility and underscoring the need to move beyond discussion to collective action in building a stronger global architecture for health security that unites partners across regions, disciplines, and pathogen domains.  

Among dozens of sessions, three stood out as particularly insightful.  

Countering Deliberate Biothreats 

This plenary session examined how governance systems can keep pace with an increasingly complex and evolving biological threat landscape. Panelists discussed that the absence of detected biological attacks does not necessarily mean they have not occurred, but rather that an attack has not been detected, particularly when considering novel outbreaks of unknown origin.  

Speakers emphasized that a biological event that goes undetected for weeks or months can result in high morbidity and mortality, citing lessons learned from the Ebola outbreak and the consequences of delayed detection. As technology continues to evolve and lower barriers to designing pathogens, participants stressed the need to get ahead of emerging risks rather than continually reacting to them. A consistent theme throughout the discussion was that investments in detection today will directly impact future biodeterrence and the wider biodefense threat landscape. Panelists stressed the importance of keeping pace with the growing number of high-risk research projects and the increasing number of high-containment laboratories, with one panelist urging the integration of biosecurity into the grant, not just as a side component. Specifically, recommending that biosafety and biosecurity be built into technology development and highlighting efforts such as CEPI’s integrated biosecurity oversight as a model for responsible vaccine research. Additional recommendations included strengthening biosafety programs in low-income countries, creating opportunities for rising biosecurity leaders, and increasing biosecurity investments between the health, defense, and agriculture sectors. 

Bluetooth-Powered Tabletop Exercise with Operation Outbreak 

In lieu of a traditional panel session, the team at Operation Outbreak conducted an interactive, Bluetooth-enabled tabletop exercise simulating the spread of a fictional pathogen across participating phones. The exercise allowed users to simulate a high-risk infectious disease outbreak in a cohesive, hands-on learning environment, allowing users to engage in critical thinking and preparedness strategies to detect, mitigate, and respond during a simulated disease outbreak. The tabletop exercise was facilitated by the group’s CEO, Kian Sani, COO, Curtis Hoffmann, and the group’s Biosecurity Education Lead, Dr. Susan Cropp. During the exercise, participants used simulated data generated by the app to evaluate ongoing disease dynamics, simulating how individuals, including those focused on the technical aspect, would coordinate with policymakers during a developing biosecurity incident with an unknown pathogen. Groups had to work together to decide what resources to invest in, including diagnostics, medical countermeasures, and personal protective equipment (PPE) such as vaccines, tests, and masks, as well as when, how, and to whom to distribute them to as the outbreak progressed. The exercise challenged decision-making under conditions in which case rates were increasing, but disease information was limited and continually evolving. 

Mirror Life: A One Health Imperative for Global Health Security  

Of all the sessions throughout the 4-day conference, this one was a completely new topic I was not yet aware of, and I found it to be one of the most interesting sessions. Dr. Tom Inglesby began with a high-level overview of mirror life and a clear explanation of chirality, outlining how biological molecules in our world naturally spin in one direction, and how mirror versions of these molecules are now being explored through synthetic biology. Noting that mirror bacteria pose a unique biosecurity challenge because the human immune system may fail to recognize mirror proteins, as they do not interact with antibodies and immune cells in the same way. Additionally, pathogen diagnostics may fail to detect mirror organisms, while some antibiotics may be ineffective because their mechanisms of action target biological structures based on chirality. Panelists noted that mirror molecules can exist without mirror organisms, and that while no one is actively working to create mirror life organisms, researchers are actively working on functional components such as mirror ribosomes and other components. Panelists then discussed the importance of anticipatory governance, arguing that policy discussions should occur before capabilities mature rather than rely solely on surveillance and response measures. Given the uncertainty surrounding future advances in synthetic biology, speakers stressed the need for anticipatory governance and international norms to guide future research and prevent scientific advances from outpacing policy development.  

Attending the 4th Global Health Security Conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, not only served as an incredible learning opportunity but also provided invaluable cultural and networking opportunities with key leaders in the global health security and biosecurity. This conference continues to serve as the gold standard for advancing health security through exchange on emerging infectious disease threats, strengthening surveillance and early warning capabilities, and deepening international collaboration across research, policy, and operational communities.  

While the Global Health Security Network has not yet announced the location of the 5th conference, the next biannual meeting is expected to convene in 2028. I strongly encourage anyone working or studying in global health and biosecurity to plan to attend!  

Australia Confirms First Cases of Bird Flu 

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

Australia, long the only continent without a confirmed mainland case of the H5N1 strain of avian influenza that has plagued wild bird and mammal populations since 2021, has confirmed its first case of bird flu. Last week, authorities confirmed that a brown skua tested positive in Western Australia’s Cape Le Grand National Park. Within days a second case was reported, followed closely by detection in a migratory bird in a second state, South Australia. Western Australia said it expects to confirm a third case of the virus after additional samples were sent for testing following dozens of reports of sick or dead birds. 

The virulent H5 strain has spread through global wild bird and mammal populations since 2021, killing millions of animals and infecting poultry farms, dairy operations, and some farmworkers. In response to the recent confirmed cases, authorities have ramped up ground surveillance and drone surveys at sea lion breeding sites, augmenting previous preparation which included tightened farm biosecurity, shore bird testing, vaccination of vulnerable species, and response simulations. The confirmed cases briefly prompted Papua New Guinea, Australia’s largest poultry export market, to suspend imports, though restrictions were later lifted with some caveats. Wildlife experts warn the virus could devastate native species, including endangered shorebirds, coastal raptors, and the precarious Australian sea lion population. 

Screwworm Cases Climb in Texas 

Meanwhile, the United States has confirmed four new cases of New World screwworm in Texas (a lamb, two calves, and a goat), bringing the total to 16. The USDA’s primary weapon is the release of millions of sterile male flies, which curb reproduction since female screwworms mate only once. However, North America has just one production facility operating at maximum capacity, falling far short of the roughly 500 million flies weekly that experts say eradication requires. The incursion has triggered partisan finger-pointing over staffing cuts and border policy, as well as disagreement over whether to pair sterilization with other tools like genetically engineered flies or insecticide baits. The US government currently produces about 100 million sterile flies per week from the active facility in Panama. A second facility in Metapa, Mexico, is expected to come online at the end of the week and will eventually add 100 million more, though building to that capacity will take time. USDA officials testified they expect to produce only about 9 million flies per week there by the end of July. A domestic facility at Moore Air Base in Edinburg, projected to open in late 2027, should contribute another 100 million when it launches, with an eventual capacity of 300 million sterile flies per week. Even with additional flies to slow the spread, there likely still won’t be enough to eradicate the parasitic fly from the US. 

Further Reading:  

GMU Biodefense Professor Coauthors Paper on Scientific Advocacy and Dissent in China and Russia  

Dr. Sonia Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, an Associate Professor in the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, coauthored a new paper in Health Security that discusses the different ways scientific communities in China and Russia express dissent and advocate for the responsible conduct of research. By analyzing local scientific communities’ responses to controversial human germline genome editing experiments conducted by He Jiankiu in China and proposed by Dennis Rebrikov in Russia, the article shows how local scientific communities have engaged with the public and government authorities to shape public discourse in debates and deliberations around controversies involving science and technology, and what they can achieve, even in the confined space permitted by authoritarian regimes.   

BioSafe Advocacy Network High-Level Virtual Workshop 2026: Dual-Use Research of Concern (DURC) and the Responsible Use of Life Sciences 

From the BioSafe Advocacy Network: “Looking to strengthen your understanding of the responsible use of life sciences? Join us for an engaging workshop featuring practical case studies, interactive sessions, and expert-led discussions on responsible conduct in the life sciences. 
Participants will gain valuable insights into: 
• Responsible research and innovation practices 
• Risk-informed approaches to biosafety and biosecurity 
• Real-world case studies and scenario-based learning 
• Frameworks aligned with World Health Organization (WHO) guidance. 

As a mandatory prerequisite, all applicants must complete the WHO Academy course, “Dual-Use Research and the Responsible Use of the Life Sciences.”  

This virtual workshop will take place from July 22-23, 2026. The application deadline is June 30. Learn more and apply here. 

Preparing for a Future of AI-Enabled Biology 

From the National Academy of Medicine (NAM): “Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the life sciences, including how researchers study biology, develop vaccines and treatments, and detect disease outbreaks. While these advances could improve public health and preparedness, they also raise important questions about safety, security, and the possibility of misuse. 

To better understand these issues, the National Academy of Medicine, in collaboration with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and with support from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), will convene a two-day workshop on preparing for the future of AI-enabled biology. 

The workshop will bring together experts from public health, medicine, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, biosecurity, government, and industry to explore how AI-enabled biological risks may evolve over the next decade.” 

This hybrid event will take place on August 11-12, 2026. Learn more and register here.

Ninth Session of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Biological Weapons Convention  

From the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA): “We will convene the Ninth Session of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). Chaired by Ambassador Frederico S. Duque Estrada Meyer of Brazil, the meeting will bring together State Parties, international organizations, academic institutions, and civil society representatives to continue discussions on strengthening the Convention and advancing efforts to address biological threats. Public sessions will be webcast through UN Web TV, and side events are expected throughout the week.  

This event will take place from August 17-21 at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. Learn more and register by July 31 here.  

Biosecurity Simulation Exercise (BSX 2026): Laboratory Incidents & Deliberate Biothreats 

From the Asia Centre for Health Security: “This table-top simulation exercise aims to enhance inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary preparedness for laboratory biosafety and biosecurity (LBB) and deliberate biothreat events (DBE). Through lectures, discussions, and structured, scenario-driven exercises, participants will explore decision-making to detect, risk-assess, and manage high-consequence biological incidents under conditions of incomplete information and unfolding events. Participants will collaborate in teams, building on expert perspectives to address issues in surveillance, diagnostics, public health response, security assessment, and risk communication.” 

This in-person event will be held from August 27-28. Learn more and register here. 

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’ 

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).” 

This in-person event will be held from October 12 – 16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here. 

Pandora Report 6.19.2026

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s promotion of Russian biolab disinformation, new revelations about Syria’s hidden chemical weapons stockpiles and accountability for state-sponsored poisoning, the growing Ebola outbreak in the DRC, the spread of New World screwworm and ongoing H5N1 mysteries, and emerging debates over AI-enabled biology, dual-use research, and biosecurity governance.  

DNI Tulsi Gabbard Echoes Russian Disinformation About US-Funded Labs 

On June 12, 2026, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) issued a press release claiming to have uncovered evidence of a secret network of 120 U.S.-funded laboratories around the world, including 40 in Ukraine, that were conducting research on dangerous pathogens and engaging in so-called “dangerous gain-of-function” research. According to ODNI, “The information surrounding the existence, history, locations, and funding of these U.S.-funded biolabs has been intentionally covered up by powerful people falsely claiming that they do not exist and accusing anyone who says otherwise to be foreign assets and traitors to America.” The declassified evidence, which Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed took months to uncover, consisted of four slides, including a draft memo with unresolved (but redacted) comments in the margins, a grossly inaccurate map, and two slides with charts and figures based on U.S. government budget data and work product from an American company. Despite the ODNI logo on the slides, which makes them look official, none of the material presented is from a finished intelligence product, and none of the information substantiates any of Gabbard’s allegations. Indeed, as Laura Loomer pointed out on X, the last two slides are taken directly from a Russian disinformation briefing. Former Department of Defense biodefense official Al Mauroni called the ODNI release a “nothing burger.” The Ukrainian ministries of foreign affairs and health issued denials and insisted that Ukraine is in compliance with the Biological Weapons Convention and takes biosafety and biosecurity seriously, as Professor Gregory Koblentz, Director of the Biodefense Graduate Program, and Biodefense PhD student Ryan Houser documented in a 2023 article. 

Russian state media and the rest of the Russian disinformation ecosystem, however, were very excited and have devoted considerable effort to magnifying Gabbard’s allegations, which echo those issued by the Kremlin as one of the key justifications for Russia’s unprovoked and illegal invasion of Ukraine. Indeed, Gabbard embraced this Russian narrative about the allegedly nefarious and dangerous activities of U.S.-supported public health labs in Ukraine, including those built during Trump’s first term, in March 2022, shortly after the Russian invasion. Gabbard’s recycling of Kremlin-generated propaganda is not new and was a major component of her views on the Syrian civil war, including her position that President Bashar al-Assad did not use chemical weapons during that conflict. Specifically, Gabbard has denied that the Syrian air force dropped a sarin-filled bomb on the town of Khan Sheikhoun in April 2017, killing 100 people. Neither Gabbard nor ODNI commented on the announcement in late May by the Syrian government that they had uncovered a cache of chemical weapons hidden by the Assad regime from international inspectors, including precursors for sarin, the sarin stabilizer hexamine, more than 50 bombs of the same type that had been used in the Khan Sheikhoun attack, and more than 20 rockets of the same type used in the 2013 sarin attack on Ghouta which killed more than 1,000 people. Despite Gabbard’s self-professed concern about biological threats to U.S. national security, she dismantled the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center and has remained silent about Russia’s modernization of its chemical and biological weapons programs, including the construction of a new BSL-4 lab at a Russian military virology facility that has a history of working with Ebola, Marburg, and smallpox.  For more on Professor Kobentz’s views on Gabbard’s biolab snipe hunt and the long-lasting negative consequences of her tenure as DNI, you can watch his interview with Sasha Ingber, host of HUMINT and the International Spy Museum’s SpyCast podcast. 

EU Sanctions Russians for the Poisoning Death of Alexei Navalny 

On June 15, 2026, the European Union imposed a new round of sanctions on individuals and entities supporting Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, hybrid warfare, and its violations of human rights. Among those sanctioned were one entity and 15 individuals, including Russian Supreme Court Justice Oleg Nefedov, Prosecutor General Alexander Gutsan, law enforcement officials, FSB officers, and medical personnel for their role in the persecution, poisoning, and death of Alexei Navalny.  These individuals were primarily involved in the August 2020 poisoning of Navalny with the nerve agent Novichok. Navalny died on February 16, 2024, while serving a 19-year prison term in an Arctic penal colony. On February 14, 2025, the UK, Sweden, France, Germany, and the Netherlands issued a joint statement that Navalny’s death was caused by poisoning with epibatidine, a toxin derived from poison dart frogs found in South America, and that the Kremlin was responsible for Navalny’s murder. The use of epibatidine to poison Navalny was discussed by Professor Gregory Koblentz, Director of the Biodefense Graduate Program, when he testified before the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense at the Atlantic Council about the threat posed by state-run toxin weapon programs. Last month, the commission published a report, Promote the Antidote: Reducing the Risk from Toxins, on how to strengthen national and international preparedness for toxin threats. 

Screwworms Spread, Bird Flu Continues to Baffle  

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

Two animal-health threats, New World screwworm (NWS) and highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), are renewing attention on the systems that protect the nation’s food supply, and on how much scientists still don’t know. 

The USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has now confirmed 12 cases of NWS in the United States. Eleven of the cases are in Texas, where the first was confirmed in a 3-week-old calf on June 3, and one is in New Mexico. The most recent new case was detected on June 11 in a sheep in Sullivan County, Texas. The CDC activated a Level 3 emergency response last week, the lowest of its three levels, to support the USDA and Texas health officials. 

Meanwhile, the HPAI outbreak in dairy cattle continues to puzzle researchers. A new Ohio State University study published in Nature Communications found that just 10 viral particles of H5N1 can infect a cow and establish robust infection and shedding of high-titer virus in milk. Despite evidence of the low infectious dose, a clear answer on how H5N1 spreads on dairy farms remains elusive, as the study’s transmission experiments were largely inconclusive. Contaminated milking equipment, calf feeding and shared air with poultry all failed to clearly spread the disease under controlled conditions. Senior author Andrew Bowman, a professor of veterinary preventive medicine, still suspects milking equipment is the likeliest route between cows, but he notes the question of how the virus jumps from wild birds into cattle is also still unclear. “In waterfowl, it’s a pathogen replicating in their gut. How in the world does it go from a duck’s intestine into a cow’s mammary gland? That’s a head scratcher.” Despite ongoing research, it seems the mystery of HPAI transmission, and the risk of future spillovers, endures. 

Further Reading:  

IN OTHER NEWS 

U.S. Public Health Capacity, Funding, and Workforce Cuts  

Ebola Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 

Biotechnology, AI and Biological Data Governance 

Animal Health, Agricultural Biosecurity and Emerging Biological Threats 

Chemical Weapons Accountability & Nonproliferation 

Podcasts

“Biosecurity in the Era of Science Fiction: AIxBio and Project Paraphrase with Bruce Wittmann,” Sci on the Fly 

NEW: Preparing for a Future of AI-Enabled Biology 

From the National Academy of Medicine (NAM): “Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the life sciences, including how researchers study biology, develop vaccines and treatments, and detect disease outbreaks. While these advances could improve public health and preparedness, they also raise important questions about safety, security, and the possibility of misuse. 

To better understand these issues, the National Academy of Medicine, in collaboration with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and with support from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), will convene a two-day workshop on preparing for the future of AI-enabled biology. 

The workshop will bring together experts from public health, medicine, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, biosecurity, government, and industry to explore how AI-enabled biological risks may evolve over the next decade.” 

This hybrid event will take place on August 11-12, 2026. Learn more and register here.  

BioSafe Advocacy Network High-Level Virtual Workshop 2026: Dual-Use Research of Concern (DURC) and the Responsible Use of Life Sciences 

From the BioSafe Advocacy Network: “Looking to strengthen your understanding of the responsible use of life sciences? Join us for an engaging workshop featuring practical case studies, interactive sessions, and expert-led discussions on responsible conduct in the life sciences. 
Participants will gain valuable insights into: 
• Responsible research and innovation practices 
• Risk-informed approaches to biosafety and biosecurity 
• Real-world case studies and scenario-based learning 
• Frameworks aligned with World Health Organization (WHO) guidance. 

As a mandatory prerequisite, all applicants must complete the WHO Academy course, “Dual-Use Research and the Responsible Use of the Life Sciences.”  

This virtual workshop will take place from July 22-23, 2026. The application deadline is June 30. Learn more and apply here. 

Ninth Session of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Biological Weapons Convention  

From the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA): “We will convene the Ninth Session of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). Chaired by Ambassador Frederico S. Duque Estrada Meyer of Brazil, the meeting will bring together State Parties, international organizations, academic institutions, and civil society representatives to continue discussions on strengthening the Convention and advancing efforts to address biological threats. Public sessions will be webcast through UN Web TV, and side events are expected throughout the week.  

This event will take place from August 17-21 at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. Learn more and register by July 31 here.  

Biosecurity Simulation Exercise (BSX 2026): Laboratory Incidents & Deliberate Biothreats 

From the Asia Centre for Health Security: “This table-top simulation exercise aims to enhance inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary preparedness for laboratory biosafety and biosecurity (LBB) and deliberate biothreat events (DBE). Through lectures, discussions, and structured, scenario-driven exercises, participants will explore decision-making to detect, risk-assess, and manage high-consequence biological incidents under conditions of incomplete information and unfolding events. Participants will collaborate in teams, building on expert perspectives to address issues in surveillance, diagnostics, public health response, security assessment, and risk communication.” 

This in-person event will be held from August 27-28. Learn more and register here. 

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’ 

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).” 

This in-person event will be held from October 12 – 16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.