Pandora Report 9.04.2026: Biodefense Goes Local, H5N1 Hits Mink Farms, and AI Reshapes Bioweapons Risk

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue examines the growing importance of local capacity in biodefense, the detection of H5N1 on a U.S. mink farm, and emerging questions at the intersection of AI, biotechnology, and biological security. 


Join the Chemical Weapons Convention Coalition and Arms Control Association for a virtual briefing, “Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy: Current Issues and Challenges,” on September 16 at 11:00 AM-12:30 PM ET. The event will examine Syria’s ongoing efforts to address the chemical weapons legacy of the Assad regime.



The Elephant in the Room: Biodefense Goes Localor Outbreaks Go Viral

By Carmen Shaw, Pandora Report Managing Editor

Figure 1. Fresh produce on display at a supermarket.
Source: Pexels.

Washington has long approached biodefense through a centralized, top-down approach, with federal agencies setting national priorities and strategies. However, recent outbreaks expose a critical vulnerability in that model: national biodefense is only as resilient as the local systems that carry it out. During this year’s cyclospora outbreak, Michigan investigators waited 12 days for Taco Bell supply chain records that a delayed FDA traceability rule would have required within 24 hours – a delay compounded by staffing shortages and an estimated $5.8 billion cut to CDC grant funding since last year. Meanwhile, Michigan was tracking more than 12,000 cyclospora cases while the national count stood at just 145.

The answer is not to abandon federal leadership, but to strengthen frontline capacity at the state and local levels. On Sep. 1, ASPR and NETEC announced a second round of STAND Awards, adding 21 hospitals across 16 states and territories to the National Special Pathogen System (NSPS), bringing the network to 75 facilities. In Bethel, Alaska, the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation has demonstrated how a tribal health system can build its own wastewater surveillance capacity, detecting influenza A up to 10 days before clinical data confirmed it and identifying rising COVID-19 and RSV activity. Uganda offers another example: during the 2026 Bundibugyo virus outbreak, the country met all three WHO 7-1-7 outbreak response benchmarks, detecting the outbreak in six days, notifying authorities in under one day, and completing early response actions within two days.

True biodefense preparedness requires federal leadership to actively strengthen state, local, tribal, and regional capacity, ensuring people and institutions are ready to detect and respond where threats first emerge.

Further Reading:


H5N1 Arrives on U.S. Mink Farms

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

The USDA confirmed avian influenza H5N1 on a Utah mink farm in mid-August, marking the virus’s first detection in a U.S. mink operation. Scientists have long flagged farmed mink as a potential pandemic risk as the size and density of the farms create a perfect environment in which the virus can mutate. An H5N1 outbreak in Spain in 2022 infected tens of thousands of minks and demonstrated the first documented evidence of mammal-to-mammal spread. Minks also have very similar respiratory systems to humans, creating conditions that researchers warn could help the virus evolve toward person-to-person transmission. Unfortunately, the concern isn’t purely theoretical. During the Covid-19 pandemic, mutated coronavirus strains circulated on fur farms across several European countries, and Denmark reported a dozen farm workers infected with a mink-linked variant that was less responsive to vaccines.

In addition to ethical and economic reasons, the zoonotic disease risk from farmed mink has already prompted most European countries to shut down or phase out fur farming. The U.S., however, has no federal ban on mink farming, and states including Utah, Wisconsin, and Minnesota still operate dozens of farms housing up to 12,000 animals apiece. Roughly 1.3 million pelts a year are produced in the U.S. for export, largely to Chinese fashion manufacturers. In response to the Utah detection, animal welfare groups are now pressing the USDA to phase out mink farming entirely, citing both the animal welfare concerns of the industry and its potential role as a breeding ground for the next pandemic virus.

Screwworm Zones Lifted in Texas

On a more encouraging note, USDA APHIS announced the release of two New World screwworm (NWS)-infested zones in Texas after coordinated surveillance, sterile fly releases, and livestock movement restrictions met federal criteria. It’s the first such release since the re-emergence of NWS in Texas in early June. The move lifts NWS-related movement requirements for producers in those zones, though other infested areas remain under restriction as the state-federal response continues. No new cattle infestations were detected in August in the U.S., but that does not mean NWS is disappearing just yet. Texas confirmed four new cases in domestic species in August: two in sheep, one in goats, and, most recently, in a dog detected on Monday, August 31st. Three of these cases remain active as of this week.

Further Reading: 


Schar School Professor Examines AI and Biological Weapons Risks

Dr. Sonia Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Associate Professor of the Biodefense Graduate Program at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government, examines the “de-skilling” narrative surrounding AI and biological weapons policy in a new article for the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. She argues that assessments of AI-driven biological threats often overestimate the ability of AI and other emerging technologies to lower barriers to biological weapons development while underestimating the importance of tacit knowledge, integration across stages of development, and the challenges of constructing durable sociotechnical systems. Ouagrham-Gormley calls for more empirically grounded threat assessments that consider the full bioweapons development process and inform targeted policy responses.


IN OTHER NEWS

Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Biotechnology

Public Health, CDC and Health Security

Emerging Infectious Diseases and Outbreaks

NEW: Bloomsday 2026

From Biotic: “Bloomsday 2026 will bring together researchers, ethicists, and policymakers to explore the emerging field of synthetic-cell engineering and the foundations needed to make the technology safe, reliable, and broadly accessible. The program will examine genome construction, computational tools, safety and security, dual-use risks, governance, and the ethical implications of engineered cellular systems.”

The event will take place on Thursday, September 10, 9:15 AM – 6:00 PM ET at the Science History Institute in Philadelphia. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Bioeconomy Summit

The Bioeconomy Summit, hosted by TechConnect, will bring together industry leaders, investors, federal officials, and experts to examine how the United States can strengthen and scale its bioeconomy. The summit will focus on aligning capital, policy, infrastructure, procurement, and industrial capacity; addressing vulnerabilities in biomanufacturing supply chains; and accelerating the deployment of bioindustrial technologies.

The summit will take place on Monday-Tuesday, September 21-22, at the National Harbor in Maryland. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Science of Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence for Life Sciences and Biotechnology Conference

From the National Academies: “This meeting brings together researchers and practitioners across various fields to define the emerging scientific method for artificial intelligence, focusing on benchmarks, leaderboards, challenges, and the evidence needed to trust systems that reason, act, discover, and operate in high-stakes domains, including the life sciences and biotechnology sectors.”

This conference will take place on Tuesday-Wednesday, September 22-23. Learn more and register here.

NEW: The Second Bio-Responsibility Policy Lecture: “From Lab Safety to Bio-Responsibility: Building the Human Infrastructure for Safe and Secure Science.”

From organizers: “Advances in the life sciences are creating new opportunities for health, biotechnology, and economic development while also presenting increasingly complex biosafety and biosecurity challenges. The lecture will examine how institutions can develop practical, risk-based biorisk management systems, with a focus on the trained professionals and institutional capacity needed to translate policy into practice. It will also explore approaches to expanding biorisk management capacity through scalable training, competency development, and institutional support, including in resource-constrained settings.”

The virtual lecture will take place on Thursday, September 24, 8:00 AM – 9:15 AM ET. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Frontiers in Synthetic Biology: SpudCells, Mirror Life and Societal Implications

From the Consortium on Law and Values: “Advances in cell engineering and synthetic biology offer enormous potential benefits, while raising ethical and policy issues. SpudCell, the first synthetic cell that can grow and reproduce, built from non-living chemicals, was developed by a team at the University of Minnesota. Scientists have cautioned against creating organisms with molecules that are mirror images of the biological components of known life, as existing organisms would have no immune defenses. Join three experts on synthetic biology, biosecurity, and bioethics to explore how to realize the promise of synthetic biology while controlling potential risks.”

This webinar will take place on Thursday, October 29, 3:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB)

From the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH): “The 28th PACCARB public meeting will explore how microbiome science can support AMR prevention, drive novel interventions, and build public awareness and understanding of microbiome-focused health measures. The meeting will focus on innovative and emerging topics in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the microbiome.”

This hybrid meeting will take place on September 9-10 from 9:00 AM–5:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Exponential AI and Biotech Growth: Translating Technical to Policy – Workshop

From AI for SynBio: “The continued acceleration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), Biological Design Tools (BDTs), and Biological AI Models (BAIMs) has transformed the technological landscape, enabling tremendous benefits and potential misuse that could massively impact national security, defense, health, and economy. Mitigating this risk will require collaboration across Government, Industry, and Academia with both technical and policy focuses. Significant effort, especially at the federal level, has been made to raise awareness of this challenge, yet additional discussion is necessary to keep pace with the ever-evolving speed of this global technology.’

This workshop will take place from September 15-17 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

International Bio-Responsibility Conference 2027

Organized under the Bio-Responsibility Initiative at the Centre for Society and Policy (CSP), the conference brings together people to advance dialogue, build partnerships, and promote safe, secure, and responsible life science research, development, and innovation. The conference will host experts, policymakers, and practitioners around the world to discuss emerging biological risks and ways to strengthen responsible governance.

The deadline to register is September 30. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

Pandora Report 8.28.2026: Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy, Bird Flu, and AI-Biosecurity

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights Syria’s ongoing chemical weapons legacy; Biodefense alumna Saskia Popescu and her work in global health security; emerging infectious disease threats, including H5N1 in Australian mammals and New World screwworm in Mexico; and the evolving landscape of AI-enabled biology and biosafety regulations. 


Join the Chemical Weapons Convention Coalition and Arms Control Association for a virtual briefing, “Syria’s Chemical Weapons Legacy: Current Issues and Challenges,” on September 16 at 11:00 AM-12:30 PM ET. The event will examine Syria’s ongoing efforts to address the chemical weapons legacy of the Assad regime.

Schar School Highlights Biodefense Alumna Saskia Popescu

The Schar School of Policy and Government profiled Dr. Saskia Popescu, 2019 Biodefense PhD alumna and current adjunct professor, highlighting her work in global health security, biosecurity policy, and outbreak preparedness. Popescu currently serves as CEO of the Global Health Security Network (GHSN), an Australian-based NGO dedicated to the detection, prevention, and control of infectious disease threats, and recently led the 4th Global Health Security Conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, which brought together more than 1,300 participants from 88 countries around the world. She continues to research biosecurity and resilience while teaching in the Schar School’s Biodefense program. Read the full profile here.

Figure 1. Dr. Saskia Popescu, Biodefense PhD ’19, leads the Global Health Security Network (GHSN) while continuing to teach and conduct research in biosecurity. Photo provided.

Bird Flu Reaches Australian Mammals

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

Australia’s H5N1 avian influenza outbreak has hit a new milestone as mammalian cases have been confirmed. A long-nosed fur seal was found dead on South Australia’s coast last week, marking the nation’s first mammalian case. The animal had no visible injuries and did not appear to be associated with other sick or dead marine mammals. Seals are especially vulnerable to avian influenza because they share coastal habitat closely with wild birds. Only days later, a red fox in suburban Adelaide became the first suspected case in a terrestrial mammal, likely infected after scavenging a sick bird. University of Sydney veterinary public health expert Michael Ward warned foxes could serve as a “bridge species,” potentially carrying the virus far inland to livestock like sheep. Australia’s red fox population is estimated at 1.7 million animals across 80% of the continent. More than 300 infection events have now been confirmed nationwide since the virus arrived in June, including deaths among ravens, penguins, terns, and gulls. Authorities are urging residents to leash dogs and keep cats indoors, while conservation sites like Cleland Wildlife Park begin vaccinating native birds. Fortunately, the virus has not reached Australia’s commercial poultry industry.

U.S.-Mexico Cattle Trade Resumes Despite Screwworm Concerns

The U.S. reopened its border to Mexican cattle this week, ending a year-long ban imposed due to concern for the spread of New World screwworm. Nearly 700 cattle crossed into Douglas, Arizona, on Monday, following a rigorous inspection procedure which includes RFID tagging and screening by specially trained screwworm-sniffing dogs. USDA chief veterinary officer Alan Huddleston called it a proof-of-concept protocol that could expand to more border crossings if successful. The reopening came just days after Sonora, the exporting state, reported its first screwworm case, though officials maintain the cattle pose no risk. Import volumes will scale gradually from 700 to 1,300 cattle daily. The ban previously pushed U.S. beef prices to record highs while forcing Mexican ranchers to sell domestically at steep discounts. Mexico currently has nearly 2,000 active screwworm cases nationwide, less than half of the infections reported a year ago, which authorities say shows progress in containing the outbreak.

Further Reading: 

Biodefense PhD Alum Chris Quillen Signs Book Deal

Dr. Chris Quillen, Biodefense PhD ’25, has signed a book contract with Routledge Taylor & Francis Group and its Contemporary Terrorism Series to publish his dissertation as The Critical Role of Scientists in Chemical and Biological Terrorism. His thesis argues that scientific personnel are the driving force behind terrorist efforts to develop chemical and biological weapons (CBW) rather than the leaders of terrorist groups. Although terrorist leaders may provide strategic vision, scientists often propose the idea of CBW programs to advance their own position within their groups. Once such programs begin, scientists—not leaders—select which CBW agents to pursue based on what they believe they can achieve, decide how best to pursue them based on what they know, and ultimately determine whether the effort succeeds or fails. Leaders play only a small part in these decisions. As a result, our current focus on targeting terrorist leaders is mistaken. Instead, efforts to prevent terrorist acquisition of CBW need to focus first and foremost on targeting the scientific personnel. Rather than treating scientists as non-combatant support personnel, these individuals should be targeted as active combatants like bombmakers and attack planners. The book will be available in 2027.

IN OTHER NEWS

Pandora Preparedness and Global Health Security

AI, Biotechnology, and Biosecurity

Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB)

From the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH): “The 28th PACCARB public meeting will explore how microbiome science can support AMR prevention, drive novel interventions, and build public awareness and understanding of microbiome-focused health measures. The meeting will focus on innovative and emerging topics in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the microbiome.”

This hybrid meeting will take place on September 9-10 from 9:00 AM–5:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Exponential AI and Biotech Growth: Translating Technical to Policy – Workshop

From AI for SynBio: “The continued acceleration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), Biological Design Tools (BDTs), and Biological AI Models (BAIMs) has transformed the technological landscape, enabling tremendous benefits and potential misuse that could massively impact national security, defense, health, and economy. Mitigating this risk will require collaboration across Government, Industry, and Academia with both technical and policy focuses. Significant effort, especially at the federal level, has been made to raise awareness of this challenge, yet additional discussion is necessary to keep pace with the ever-evolving speed of this global technology.’

This workshop will take place from September 15-17 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

International Bio-Responsibility Conference 2027

Organized under the Bio-Responsibility Initiative at the Centre for Society and Policy (CSP), the conference brings together people to advance dialogue, build partnerships, and promote safe, secure, and responsible life science research, development, and innovation. The conference will host experts, policymakers, and practitioners around the world to discuss emerging biological risks and ways to strengthen responsible governance.

The deadline to register is September 30. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

Horizon Fellowship

From Horizon Institute for Public Service: “Through our fellowship, we place fully-funded fellows at host organizations to help tackle policy challenges related to artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and other emerging technologies. Fellows selected for our program receive policy-focused training, mentorship, and support in matching with a host organization for a full-time, fully-funded fellowship based in the Washington, DC area. Fellows join a collaborative, close-knit community of public service-oriented experts. Potential host organizations include executive branch offices, congressional offices, national laboratories, and think tanks.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 30.

Asia Centre for Health Security (ACHS) Fellowship Programme

From ACHS: “The ACHS Fellowship Programme aims to inspire and connect the next generation of health security leaders and innovators. Launched in 2025 by ACHS, based at the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health (SSHSPH), National University of Singapore (NUS), the ACHS Fellowship Programme is a highly competitive, part-time fellowship that provides graduate students and early- to mid-career professionals with an opportunity to deepen their expertise, expand their professional network, and build leadership skills through educational opportunities and project work.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 31.

Pandora Report 8.24.2026: G20 Youth Diplomacy, H5N5, and Africa’s Health Security Index

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights reflections on the 2026 G20 Youth (Y20) Summit culminating in the G20 Youth Communiqué, emerging infectious disease threats including H5N5 and human screwworm infections, lessons from the Nuclear Threat Initiative’s Africa Health Security Index on strengthening health capacity and resilience, and the evolving landscape of biosafety, biosecurity, and AI-enabled biology.


Reflections on the 2026 G20 Youth (Y20) Summit: Realities, Global Consensus, and the Future of Diplomacy

By Carmen Shaw, U.S. Head Delegate for Food Security and Global Health (Y20 2026) | Biodefense PhD Student and Managing Editor, The Pandora Report

Figure 1. Over 100 global delegates convened in Washington, D.C., from August 11–14 for the 2026 G20 Youth (Y20) Summit. Delegates negotiated across five key tracks—global economy, energy, digital transformation, food security and global health, and conflict resolution—culminating in the 2026 G20 Youth Communiqué presented to G20 heads of state.

Over a week ago, more than 100 global delegates came together for the 2026 G20 Youth (Y20) Summit in Washington, DC. As the U.S. Head Delegate for Food Security and Global Health, participating in this summit on American soil during a period of profound political and economic transformation was both an honor and the responsibility of a lifetime. Hosted by Globally and the Young Professionals in Foreign Policy (YPFP), the summit culminated in months of rigorous multilateral negotiations among delegates, resulting in the publication of the 2026 G20 Youth Communiqué, which was formally presented to G20 leaders.

Figure 2. Delegates participate in multilateral negotiation sessions on policy proposals for the 2026 G20 Youth Communiqué report.

Containing 81 actionable policy recommendations, this communiqué offers a clear snapshot of global youth priorities across the global economy, digital innovation, energy, conflict and violence, food security, and global health. We did not shy away from hard or uncomfortable conversations; we engaged in them openly. Across these tracks, we debated frameworks for ethical AI governance, examined concrete pathways for securing energy supply chains, and pushed for Universal Health Coverage while prioritizing resilient healthcare financing. We also tackled deeply polarizing geopolitical issues, openly debating whether tariffs and economic sanctions can—and should—be used as tools of coercion in international affairs, while considering the legal protections required for displaced populations.

Throughout these negotiations, my objective was to ensure that high-level policy remained grounded in the realities facing communities and institutions. International frameworks have limited impact unless they protect and invest in the people who drive and depend on these global systems–farmers, workers, researchers, engineers, entrepreneurs, journalists, frontline healthcare professionals, humanitarian workers, and communities affected by conflict and displacement. Our experience demonstrated that effective multilateralism is built not on the absence of disagreement, but on deep empathy, strategic cooperation, and the willingness to find common ground.

There is no shortage of noise today about how divided our world has become, and America’s shifting role within it. Yet when you sit down at the negotiating table with young leaders from across the globe—doing the hours-long, painstaking work of reaching consensus across deep ideological divides—a very different story emerges. The future of international diplomacy and policy is stronger when young, empathetic, and pragmatic leaders step forward, listen openly, and work together to address the world’s most pressing challenges.

The channel between youth and our leaders is open. Our voices are unified, and the work of translating these policy recommendations into meaningful diplomatic action begins now.

Transmission Risk of Human H5N5

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

In a study published last week in the Journal of Virology, researchers evaluated the transmission risk of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAI) A(H5N5) following the world’s first confirmed human infection and fatality in November 2025. The patient, an older adult in Washington State with underlying health conditions, developed fever, confusion and worsening respiratory illness that required hospitalization and ultimately resulted in death. The patient kept a mixed backyard poultry flock, and environmental samples from the property tested positive for the H5N5 virus. No person-to-person spread was identified.

Testing the virus stain in human bronchial epithelial cells and in a ferret model, researchers found that the isolate replicated efficiently at human airway temperatures and caused fatal systemic disease but showed no capacity for airborne spread. Limited transmission occurred only with direct contact. Collectively, the results underscored the heterogeneity among clade 2.3.4.4b HPAI H5Nx viruses and the need for genotype-by-genotype evaluation of newly emerged influenza viruses to understand the public health risk.

The potential public health risk of HPAI is also at the forefront of the ongoing outbreak in Australian wildlife. Dr. Frank Wong, a Senior Research Scientist with the Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP) said the risk of bird flu spreading to humans within the country remains very low. He noted an “ecological perfect storm” would be required for the virus to spill over, though that does not mitigate the need to stay on high alert. Clinicians should still inquire about recent contact with potentially infected animals and should strongly encourage seasonal influenza vaccination, particularly as national flu vaccine coverage has fallen from 45.6% in June 2020 to 26.2% in June 2026.

Human Screwworm Infections Climb in Mexico

More than 500 people in Mexico have been infected with New World screwworm (NWS), a sharp rise in infections from last year. A recent study in CDC’s Emerging Infectious Diseases examined 202 confirmed Mexican cases from April 2025 to March 2026 and found that reporting rose from roughly three cases a week in 2025 to more than nine a week in 2026. Legs or feet were affected in 55% of cases, with others involving the nose, mouth and eyes. Six patients died, though only one death was directly attributed to the infestation.

Although Mexico was declared free of NWS in 2003, this recent rise in human cases is not unexpected given the northward spread of the parasite, which re-emerged in animals in Mexico in 2024. The same obligate parasite affects livestock, wildlife, companion animals, and humans, so a rise in animal cases indicates local circulation of the fly and an increased risk for concurrent human infestation. Thus, NWS is both a public health and animal health problem and calls for a One Health approach. Since the spread of NWS is expected to continue for the foreseeable future, the authors urge surveillance, diagnostic preparedness, animal movement controls, and fly-suppression activities to be implemented proactively at the leading edge of expansion, rather than only after human cases are detected. Coordination between human health, animal health, wildlife, and agricultural sectors will be essential to guide prevention and control measures.

Further Reading: 

Exploring Global Health Security Policy: My Summer Internship Experience with the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI)

By Alex Kyabarongo, MS Biodefense Student, George Mason University

Figure 3. Alex Kyabarongo is a second-year MS Biodefense student at George Mason University, with a special interest in global health security policy and biothreat reduction programs. He recently completed a summer internship with NTI, where he contributed to the Africa Health Security Index.

As the Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) outpaces containment efforts, with over 4,600 cases and more than 2,100 confirmed deaths as of August 12, the world remains more vulnerable to infectious disease threats than ever before. This outbreak—which experts say might be the deadliest Ebola outbreak yet due to its rapid spread—should serve as a stark reminder of the need to strengthen global health security programs. It should be a call to focus on improving disease surveillance capacities, biosafety and biosecurity, and other prevention, preparedness, and response efforts across the globe. Yet, this outbreak has occurred at a time when global health security financing remains fragmented, with shifts in international development assistance severely affecting health security programs in many countries, while the World Health Organization (WHO) Member States continue to face challenges in operationalizing the Pandemic Agreement.

It is such concerning global health security challenges that inspired me to enroll in the Master of Biodefense program at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, with the intention of deepening my knowledge and understanding at the intersection of health and security. With the same aspirations, this summer, I joined the Nuclear Threat Initiative’s Global Biological Policy and Programs (NTI | bio) team for a 10-week internship. This internship came at an important point in my graduate school journey, as I remain with only one semester left before graduation. It was an important time to put my classroom experience into practice, and many topics explored during the previous semesters helped me transition smoothly to working in this important field during the internship period.

With the NTI | bio team, I gained hands-on experience working on projects focused on countering health security threats and emerging technology risks. It was such a unique opportunity to learn from the NTI | bio team and contribute to ongoing projects such as AIxBio and DNA synthesis screening. Importantly, it was great timing that I joined when the team was working on the Africa Health Security Index (AHS Index). The AHS Index, which was jointly developed by the Nuclear Threat Initiative, the Brown University Pandemic Centre, and the Science for Africa Foundation, builds upon the previous Global Health Security Index framework to assess African countries’ health security capacities. Working on this project after having taken Dr. Scott Wollek’s BIOD 710: Health Security Preparedness class during the spring semester was highly relevant and enabled me to put the class theoretical principles learned from class into practice. For the AHS Index, I specifically worked on the risk environment category, exploring why its regional scores have continuously declined over the last three Index issues and the implications of this trend for the implementation of Africa’s health security capacities.

The AHS Index scores show that Africa’s health security capacities have improved by 9.1 points from 2021, with strong improvements in disease surveillance, prevention, and response capacities. The region has expanded laboratory capacities but still struggles with biosafety and biosecurity systems, which increases the risks of laboratory accidents and the potential misuse of biological materials. Similarly, dual-use research oversight and the culture of responsible science remain critically low, at 1.9 out of 100 across the region, which ultimately serves as an alarming call for regional health security leaders to strengthen Dual-Use Research of Concern (DURC) governance. Most importantly, the region’s political and security risks, infrastructure inadequacies, and environmental risks remain areas of vulnerability. For more on the Index launch, explore my recently published blog article, and to explore the details of the Index data, results and the recommendations, visit the Index website.

Internship programs are an important aspect of students’ professional development. I am glad that the Schar School of Policy and Government has such a supportive career development team that continuously supported me throughout my internship period. I even got academic credit for the internship! The internship was very enriching, and I gained invaluable practical experience, which ultimately complements and enhances my current graduate program experience and prepares me for new challenges. I benefited from the excellent mentorship and support of the NTI | bio team, who provided me with an opportunity to explore the topics they were working on, guided me, and provided important feedback.

One important lesson I gained was the importance of collaboration and teamwork, which were central components of the AHS Index project. I deepened my understanding of health security policy, the research needed to identify gaps to be addressed, the importance of partnerships, and how these elements come together to address global health security challenges. The current Ebola crisis in Central Africa serves as a significant reference point of how important it is to invest in health security preparedness, improve capacity, and, most importantly, make health security an integral component of national security. It is internship programs like this that build the next generation of global health security leaders.

Further Reading:

NIH Releases a Draft Biosafety Policy for Research Involving Biohazards for Public Comment

The NIH has released a Draft Biosafety Policy for Research Involving Biohazards (Biosafety Policy) for public comment as part of its effort to strengthen and modernize biosafety oversight. In September 2025, NIH announced plans to strengthen and modernize biosafety oversight and has since engaged stakeholders to inform the development of an oversight framework that addresses risk. NIH invites stakeholders to provide feedback on the Draft Biosafety Policy and associated templates via its online portal, with comments accepted until October 19, 2026.

IN OTHER NEWS

Vaccines, Immunization Policy, and U.S. Public Health

Ebola and Other Infectious Disease Emergencies

AI, Bioweapons, and Emerging Biological Threats

Biosecurity, Resilience, and Defense Strategy

NEW: International Bio-Responsibility Conference 2027

Organized under the Bio-Responsibility Initiative at the Centre for Society and Policy (CSP), the conference brings together people to advance dialogue, build partnerships, and promote safe, secure, and responsible life science research, development, and innovation. The conference will host experts, policymakers, and practitioners around the world to discuss emerging biological risks and ways to strengthen responsible governance.

The deadline to register is September 30. Learn more and register here.

Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB)

From the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH): “The 28th PACCARB public meeting will explore how microbiome science can support AMR prevention, drive novel interventions, and build public awareness and understanding of microbiome-focused health measures. The meeting will focus on innovative and emerging topics in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the microbiome.”

This hybrid meeting will take place on September 9-10 from 9:00 AM–5:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Exponential AI and Biotech Growth: Translating Technical to Policy – Workshop

From AI for SynBio: “The continued acceleration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), Biological Design Tools (BDTs), and Biological AI Models (BAIMs) has transformed the technological landscape, enabling tremendous benefits and potential misuse that could massively impact national security, defense, health, and economy. Mitigating this risk will require collaboration across Government, Industry, and Academia with both technical and policy focuses. Significant effort, especially at the federal level, has been made to raise awareness of this challenge, yet additional discussion is necessary to keep pace with the ever-evolving speed of this global technology.’

This workshop will take place from September 15-17 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC. Learn more and register here.

Biosecurity Simulation Exercise (BSX 2026): Laboratory Incidents & Deliberate Biothreats

From the Asia Centre for Health Security: “This table-top simulation exercise aims to enhance inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary preparedness for laboratory biosafety and biosecurity (LBB) and deliberate biothreat events (DBE). Through lectures, discussions, and structured, scenario-driven exercises, participants will explore decision-making to detect, risk-assess, and manage high-consequence biological incidents under conditions of incomplete information and unfolding events. Participants will collaborate in teams, building on expert perspectives to address issues in surveillance, diagnostics, public health response, security assessment, and risk communication.”

This in-person event will take place from August 27-28. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

Researcher, Built Environment Team – Job Opening

From Blueprint Biosecurity: “The built environment encompasses the indoor spaces where people work, learn, gather, and receive care. Equipping these spaces with additional layers of protection against infectious airborne pathogens can help reduce risk in these spaces and support safer, more resilient communities. This work will focus on identifying and advancing promising interventions to mitigate pathogen transmission in occupied indoor spaces and strengthen society’s ability to contain outbreaks before they become widespread. Blueprint Biosecurity is hiring up to two Researchers to work directly with the Built Environment Program Director to lay the groundwork for new areas of interest and expand Blueprint’s portfolio.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 21.

Respiratory Protection Program Officer, PPE Team – Job Opening

From Blueprint Biosecurity: “One of the most impactful ways to suppress pathogen transmission and save lives in a future outbreak is to ensure that highly protective respiratory PPE can be deployed to millions of critical workers on day one. Despite this, if a pandemic occurred tomorrow, U.S. stockpiles and supply chains would be unable to meet the demand. This problem motivated the development of the Blueprint for Pandemic PPE and has shaped our efforts to mobilize tens of millions of dollars toward advancing its goals. To build upon this momentum, Blueprint Biosecurity is hiring up to two Program Officers to expand our PPE team. These program officer roles are structured into two distinct tracks: Research Management or Grant Evaluation. Both positions will work closely with the PPE Program Director to help build a more resilient future in which critical workers have access to respirators during emergencies.

Learn more and submit your application here by August 21.

Horizon Fellowship

From Horizon Institute for Public Service: “Through our fellowship, we place fully-funded fellows at host organizations to help tackle policy challenges related to artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and other emerging technologies. Fellows selected for our program receive policy-focused training, mentorship, and support in matching with a host organization for a full-time, fully-funded fellowship based in the Washington, DC area. Fellows join a collaborative, close-knit community of public service-oriented experts. Potential host organizations include executive branch offices, congressional offices, national laboratories, and think tanks.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 30.

Asia Centre for Health Security (ACHS) Fellowship Programme

From ACHS: “The ACHS Fellowship Programme aims to inspire and connect the next generation of health security leaders and innovators. Launched in 2025 by ACHS, based at the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health (SSHSPH), National University of Singapore (NUS), the ACHS Fellowship Programme is a highly competitive, part-time fellowship that provides graduate students and early- to mid-career professionals with an opportunity to deepen their expertise, expand their professional network, and build leadership skills through educational opportunities and project work.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 31.

WHO Internship Programme

From WHO: “A competent and dynamic health workforce at the heart of each health system is essential to advance global health goals. Countries need a pool of health professionals trained and exposed to the systems and processes in the health sector and who understand how stakeholders interact within the international health arena. WHO’s Internship Programme offers a wide range of opportunities for students and recent graduates to gain insight into the technical and administrative programmes of WHO and enrich their knowledge and experience in various areas, thereby contributing to the advancement of public health.”

Learn more and apply here.

OpenAI Bio Bug Bounty Program

From OpenAI: “As part of our ongoing efforts to strengthen our safeguards for advanced AI capabilities in biology, we’re evolving our GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty to become an ongoing private program—the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program. The program will remain focused on universal jailbreaks that can defeat our predefined biosafety challenge against OpenAI’s frontier models, starting with GPT‑5.6 and going forward. The reward for a universal jailbreak for the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program has been raised from $25,000 to $50,000 for both GPT‑5.6 and GPT‑5.5. Smaller awards may be granted for partial wins at our discretion.”

Learn more and submit your application here.

Disarmament and non-proliferation of WMD – Training Program

From Asser Institute and OPCW: “By 2026, pressure on the international arms control system has reached a point few experts anticipated would arrive so quickly, driven largely by intense geopolitical fragmentation. There is a critical need for professionals who possess the legal, technical, and diplomatic expertise to navigate these modern complexities. This intensive five-day training provides a comprehensive, practical overview of the international non-proliferation and disarmament framework.”

This program will take place from October 26-30 in The Hague, the Netherlands. Learn more and register here.

Pandora Report 8.7.2026: Fauci Contempt Vote, AIxBio Threats, and One Health Fronts

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights continued congressional scrutiny of Anthony Fauci following his Senate hearing, ongoing One Health threats from H5N1 avian influenza and New World screwworm, and efforts to address the opportunities and risks of AI-enabled biology. The Pandora Report will be taking a break next week and will return on August 21, 2026.

Thank you for reading, and we look forward to sharing more updates with you soon!


Join the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) for a two-day workshop, “Preparing for a Future of AI-Enabled Biology,” on August 11-12. The event will explore emerging technology, key uncertainties, and priorities for strengthening global preparedness.

Fauci Faces Continued Congressional Scrutiny Over COVID-19 Response

Following last week’s Senate hearing, former NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci is facing continued congressional scrutiny over his role in the U.S. COVID-19 response. A Senate committee voted to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after he declined to answer questions about his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, citing his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The vote escalated a months-long dispute between Fauci and congressional investigators over questions related to COVID-19 origins, federal research funding, and pandemic decision-making. The proceedings followed the release of Fauci’s private COVID-era diary entries and additional records, including a copy of his government-issued phone. While critics have argued the materials raise concerns about transparency, fact-checkers have noted that they provide insight into Fauci’s personal experiences and frustrations during the crisis, but do not resolve ongoing scientific questions or debates surrounding COVID-19 origins.

Further Reading:

One Health on Two Fronts

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

Australia confirmed its first mass wildlife mortality from H5N1 bird flu earlier this week after more than 80 dead and sick greater crested terns were found on an island off South Australia’s south-east coast. Seventy-four cases have been confirmed nationally since June, mostly in South Australia, but fortunately no farms have yet been affected. In response to the recent mainland wildlife detections, the Australian government performed a risk assessment to better understand the potential impact on the country’s many species of native birds and mammals. More than 2,000 birds and mammals were listed from low to high risk based on their vulnerability and susceptibility, considering their habitat, ecology, behavior, and information from the global outbreaks.

Although the country’s biosecurity response has been excellent, Invasive Species Council CEO Jack Gough noted that funding to protect wildlife has gone backwards: “We won’t be able to stop bird flu spreading through wildlife, so the best response to that needs to be dealing with all the other threats. The foxes, the cats, the rats on islands, making sure wetlands are well connected, that we’re not seeing habitat destruction occurring in key nesting areas; that work hasn’t been happening at a scale which reflects the seriousness of this list.” Five seabirds, including the critically endangered Herald petrel, face extreme risk, meaning likely extinction if the virus reaches them, and more than 80 threatened species rank high or worse. Tasmanian devils, eastern quolls and several marine mammals would probably survive infection but with severely reduced populations. Vaccination requires two doses, which is impractical, if not impossible, in wild flocks, so trials are focused on captive breeding facilities.

Half a world away, Texas and surrounding states continue to battle New World screwworm. In an article published this week in Nature Ecology & Evolution, authors Andrews, Weese and Bogoch argue that the June 2026 screwworm re-emergence in Texas, the first overland US detection since the early 1980s, is the result of waning investment rather than any failure of the science. Sterile fly production and surveillance lapsed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a front pushed south over 47 years rebounded to the Texas border within only three. They acknowledge that this is a One Health problem, in which human and animal health are linked. Human myiasis is a real though comparatively uncommon problem; a huge economic toll is borne from livestock and companion animal infestations, and wildlife carry the biggest burden in sheer morbidity and mortality. The elimination of screwworms from the U.S. will require long-term, active effort to keep at bay, meaning infrastructure that must be funded, staffed, and defended indefinitely. Anything short of this sustained investment will only lead to continual re-emergence and subsequent animal and financial losses.

Prevention is invisible when it works. A sterile fly plant running at capacity and a seabird colony free of rats produce no headlines, which is precisely why the funding behind them erodes quietly. The gaps go unnoticed until they explode open, and by then the cost of response will be orders of magnitude higher than the sustained maintenance would have been.

Further Reading: 

IN OTHER NEWS

U.S. Public Health Leadership, Preparedness, and Trust

Global Health Security, Pandemic Preparedness, and International Cooperation

Biological Threats, Outbreaks, and One Health

Emerging Technologies and Evolving WMD Risks

Biological War: A Scenario

From investigative journalist Annie Jacobsen, this book explores the catastrophic consequences of a deliberate biological attack or laboratory accident, tracing how a rapidly spreading pathogen could trigger cascading failures across public health systems, government, critical infrastructure, and society.

Drawing on interviews with senior experts in national security, medicine, science, and the military, Jacobsen presents a fast-paced, scenario-based narrative that examines the hours, days, and weeks following the release of a biological agent. Like her bestselling Nuclear War: A Scenario, the book uses a fictionalized but research-informed account to highlight the challenges of biodefense, pandemic preparedness, and crisis response in the face of an existential biological threat.

Further Reading:

NEW: Army Mad Scientist Series with Dr. James Giordano – Lecture

From the Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS): “Join us for our virtual event, Braking Biowarfare: Deterrence Left-of-Denial featuring Dr. James Giordano, Head of the Center for Strategic Deterrence and Weapons of Mass Destruction Studies in the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense University. He will examine the need to shift contemporary biodefense beyond traditional reactive paradigms toward proactive strategies that prevent, delay, disrupt, and disincentivize the development and operationalization of weaponizable bioscience and biotechnology before their deployment.”

This virtual event will take place on Tuesday, August 18 from 12:00 PM-1:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB)

From the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH): “The 28th PACCARB public meeting will explore how microbiome science can support AMR prevention, drive novel interventions, and build public awareness and understanding of microbiome-focused health measures. The meeting will focus on innovative and emerging topics in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the microbiome.”

This hybrid meeting will take place on September 9-10 from 9:00 AM–5:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Exponential AI and Biotech Growth: Translating Technical to Policy – Workshop

From AI for SynBio: “The continued acceleration of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), Biological Design Tools (BDTs), and Biological AI Models (BAIMs) has transformed the technological landscape, enabling tremendous benefits and potential misuse that could massively impact national security, defense, health, and economy. Mitigating this risk will require collaboration across Government, Industry, and Academia with both technical and policy focuses. Significant effort, especially at the federal level, has been made to raise awareness of this challenge, yet additional discussion is necessary to keep pace with the ever-evolving speed of this global technology.’

This workshop will take place from September 15-17 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC. Learn more and register here.

Biosecurity Simulation Exercise (BSX 2026): Laboratory Incidents & Deliberate Biothreats

From the Asia Centre for Health Security: “This table-top simulation exercise aims to enhance inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary preparedness for laboratory biosafety and biosecurity (LBB) and deliberate biothreat events (DBE). Through lectures, discussions, and structured, scenario-driven exercises, participants will explore decision-making to detect, risk-assess, and manage high-consequence biological incidents under conditions of incomplete information and unfolding events. Participants will collaborate in teams, building on expert perspectives to address issues in surveillance, diagnostics, public health response, security assessment, and risk communication.”

This in-person event will take place from August 27-28. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

NEW: Researcher, Built Environment Team – Job Opening

From Blueprint Biosecurity: “The built environment encompasses the indoor spaces where people work, learn, gather, and receive care. Equipping these spaces with additional layers of protection against infectious airborne pathogens can help reduce risk in these spaces and support safer, more resilient communities. This work will focus on identifying and advancing promising interventions to mitigate pathogen transmission in occupied indoor spaces and strengthen society’s ability to contain outbreaks before they become widespread. Blueprint Biosecurity is hiring up to two Researchers to work directly with the Built Environment Program Director to lay the groundwork for new areas of interest and expand Blueprint’s portfolio.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 21.

NEW: Respiratory Protection Program Officer, PPE Team – Job Opening

From Blueprint Biosecurity: “One of the most impactful ways to suppress pathogen transmission and save lives in a future outbreak is to ensure that highly protective respiratory PPE can be deployed to millions of critical workers on day one. Despite this, if a pandemic occurred tomorrow, U.S. stockpiles and supply chains would be unable to meet the demand. This problem motivated the development of the Blueprint for Pandemic PPE and has shaped our efforts to mobilize tens of millions of dollars toward advancing its goals. To build upon this momentum, Blueprint Biosecurity is hiring up to two Program Officers to expand our PPE team. These program officer roles are structured into two distinct tracks: Research Management or Grant Evaluation. Both positions will work closely with the PPE Program Director to help build a more resilient future in which critical workers have access to respirators during emergencies.

Learn more and submit your application here by August 21.

NEW: Horizon Fellowship

From Horizon Institute for Public Service: “Through our fellowship, we place fully-funded fellows at host organizations to help tackle policy challenges related to artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and other emerging technologies. Fellows selected for our program receive policy-focused training, mentorship, and support in matching with a host organization for a full-time, fully-funded fellowship based in the Washington, DC area. Fellows join a collaborative, close-knit community of public service-oriented experts. Potential host organizations include executive branch offices, congressional offices, national laboratories, and think tanks.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 30.

NEW: Asia Centre for Health Security (ACHS) Fellowship Programme

From ACHS: “The ACHS Fellowship Programme aims to inspire and connect the next generation of health security leaders and innovators. Launched in 2025 by ACHS, based at the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health (SSHSPH), National University of Singapore (NUS), the ACHS Fellowship Programme is a highly competitive, part-time fellowship that provides graduate students and early- to mid-career professionals with an opportunity to deepen their expertise, expand their professional network, and build leadership skills through educational opportunities and project work.”

Learn more and submit your application here by August 31.

WHO Internship Programme

From WHO: “A competent and dynamic health workforce at the heart of each health system is essential to advance global health goals. Countries need a pool of health professionals trained and exposed to the systems and processes in the health sector and who understand how stakeholders interact within the international health arena. WHO’s Internship Programme offers a wide range of opportunities for students and recent graduates to gain insight into the technical and administrative programmes of WHO and enrich their knowledge and experience in various areas, thereby contributing to the advancement of public health.”

Learn more and apply here.

OpenAI Bio Bug Bounty Program

From OpenAI: “As part of our ongoing efforts to strengthen our safeguards for advanced AI capabilities in biology, we’re evolving our GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty to become an ongoing private program—the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program. The program will remain focused on universal jailbreaks that can defeat our predefined biosafety challenge against OpenAI’s frontier models, starting with GPT‑5.6 and going forward. The reward for a universal jailbreak for the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program has been raised from $25,000 to $50,000 for both GPT‑5.6 and GPT‑5.5. Smaller awards may be granted for partial wins at our discretion.”

Learn more and submit your application here.

Disarmament and non-proliferation of WMD – Training Program

From Asser Institute and OPCW: “By 2026, pressure on the international arms control system has reached a point few experts anticipated would arrive so quickly, driven largely by intense geopolitical fragmentation. There is a critical need for professionals who possess the legal, technical, and diplomatic expertise to navigate these modern complexities. This intensive five-day training provides a comprehensive, practical overview of the international non-proliferation and disarmament framework.”

This program will take place from October 26-30 in The Hague, the Netherlands. Learn more and register here.

Pandora Report 7.31.2026: Is the U.S. Ready for the Next Pandemic?

Welcome to this week’s Pandora Report! This issue highlights Anthony Fauci’s contentious Senate hearing on the nation’s COVID-19 response, the state of U.S. public health preparedness as infectious disease threats continue to rise, ongoing H5N1 and New World screwworm challenges, and evolving biosecurity policies at home and abroad.


Anthony Fauci Pleads the Fifth During Contentious Senate COVID-19 Hearing

Former top US health official Anthony Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during a tense July 29 hearing before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security, declining to answer questions related to the origins of COVID-19 and the nation’s handling of the pandemic. The hearing, led by Committee Chairman Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), followed the public release of Fauci’s COVID-era diaries and focused on allegations that federal funding supported risky viral research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Fauci’s attorneys advised him not to testify, citing ongoing legal concerns despite the presidential pardon he received from former President Joe Biden. Republican senators criticized his refusal to answer questions and raised the possibility of contempt proceedings, while Democratic lawmakers characterized the hearing as politically motivated and defended Fauci’s public health record.

Is America Becoming Less Prepared for the Next Pandemic?

By Carmen Shaw, Pandora Report Managing Editor

The United States is confronting several infectious disease threats at once – hantavirus, screwworm, Ebola, cyclospora, measles, whooping cough, and bird flu. Former CDC officials warn that major changes made by the administration to the nation’s public health infrastructure – reducing funding, cutting staff, changing priorities, and shuttering USAID – have left the US in worse shape than before the COVID-19 pandemic. According to The Guardian, 80% of senior leadership positions at the CDC still lack permanent officials, and the agency has lost an estimated 25-30% of its workforce. Given the dearth of proper “boots on the ground” experience, the US appears less prepared for the next major public health emergency.

It has also been reported that the Trump administration has quietly reduced the role of the HHS’ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), which supports research aimed at improving patient safety, healthcare quality, and emergency preparedness. Meanwhile, Politico reported that the State Department will move forward with dispensing approximately $600M in previously delayed vaccine funding after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. held up the funding for months due to concerns about vaccine safety. Separately, a new analysis found that while the U.S. has strengthened several aspects of its Ebola response since the 2014-2016 West Africa epidemic – including airport screening, lab diagnostics, and hospital preparedness – experts warn that maintaining these capabilities will require sustained investment and experienced personnel.

These concerns surrounding the U.S. international disease response capacity grow as disease activity continues to rise nationwide. U.S. cyclospora infection cases have reached record levels in 2026 following multiple foodborne outbreaks. U.S. measles cases have surpassed last year’s total and reached their highest level in more than three decades, driven by declining childhood vaccination coverage and several outbreaks around the nation. Taken together, these developments paint a troubling picture for the US – even as disease threats continue to mount, the nation’s public health infrastructure appears to be backsliding.

California Judge Rules H5N1 Quarantine Locations to Stay Confidential

By Margeaux Malone, Pandora Report Associate Editor 

A Sacramento County Superior Court judge ruled against disclosing the names and locations of California dairies quarantined during the 2024-25 bird flu outbreak, siding with state agriculture officials. More than 750 dairies were quarantined statewide during that period as officials worked to contain the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza. The suit was filed by the California Rural Legal Assistance (CRLA), which argued that making the information public would improve oversight of the state’s response, help protect dairy workers, and provide researchers with data to better understand the outbreak. The judge acknowledged the public interest in government transparency but concluded that protecting producer confidentiality would encourage farmers to report sick animals promptly and cooperate with disease investigations. Amanda Murray, California’s acting state veterinarian and branch chief of Animal Health and Food Safety Services, wrote, “Loss of this trust would likely have a chilling effect, wherein producers would either delay reporting or not report clinical signs of disease.” Out of fear of public backlash, some farms might have culled sick animals and disposed of them themselves, potentially spreading the disease unintentionally. Industry groups have praised the decision as vital to maintaining trust between producers and regulators, while CRLA says it’s weighing further legal options.

Cattle Imports from Mexico to Resume Amid Ongoing NWS Outbreaks

Last Friday, USDA announced a phased reopening of the US-Mexico border to cattle imports, despite the ongoing efforts to prevent further spread of New World Screwworm (NWS) into the country. Imports will start August 24 at the Douglas, Arizona port, with New Mexico crossings to follow pending Mexico’s compliance with a joint action plan targeting NWS. Sonora and Chihuahua were identified as lower-risk source states in Mexico due to stronger inspection infrastructure. The decision follows sustained pressure from Republicans and cattle industry groups to reopen the border amid elevated beef prices, a concern shared by the administration, which aims to lower prices ahead of the upcoming midterm elections.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins had previously resisted reopening the southern border over screwworm concerns, while acknowledging the economic challenges it posed to various sectors of the industry in Texas. The Biden administration first closed the border to cattle imports in late 2024 following detection of NWS in southern Mexico. The Trump administration then temporarily reopened the border from January to May 2025, before closing it again as screwworms moved northward in Mexico. While many industry groups applaud the move, others, including the United States Cattlemen’s Association (USCA), remain wary that reopening risks reintroducing the parasite before containment is complete. USCA President Justin Tupper responded to the decision, saying, “Any effort to lower beef prices must not come at the expense of U.S. cattle herd health. We’ve been encouraged to rebuild the domestic herd; it is of utmost importance, and unnecessary exposure to animal health threats is a risk we do not need to take.”

Further Reading: 

IN OTHER NEWS

Infectious Disease Outbreaks

Biosecurity Governance and High-Risk Research

Rising Temps, Rising Risks: Infectious Disease in the 2026 El Niño Year

From the Pandemic Center: “Climate variability, including El Niño-driven shifts in temperature and rainfall, is reshaping infectious disease risks by altering the environments where pathogens and vectors thrive. This year is progressing towards a historically severe El Niño event — a naturally occurring climate pattern characterized by the warming of surface waters in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean.

What impact will this compounding climate event have on disease prevalence, and which regions are most vulnerable? In this Pandemic Center webinar, we will convene an expert panel to discuss these questions and more.”

This webinar will take place on July 31 at 12:00 PM ET. Learn more and register here.

Data and Situational Awareness for Medical and Public Health Preparedness and Response: A Workshop Series

From the National Academies: “The Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Disasters and Emergencies workshop series will explore how medical, public health, emergency management, and critical infrastructure data are collected, integrated, analyzed, and translated into real-time information to support timely, coordinated decision-making before, during, and after disasters and emergencies.”

This workshop series will take place on September 23. Learn more and register here.

Preparing for a Future of AI-Enabled Biology – A Workshop

From the National Academy of Medicine (NAM): “Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the life sciences, including how researchers study biology, develop vaccines and treatments, and detect disease outbreaks. While these advances could improve public health and preparedness, they also raise important questions about safety, security, and the possibility of misuse.”

This event will take place on August 11-12. Learn more and register here.

Ninth Session of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Biological Weapons Convention

From the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA): “We will convene the Ninth Session of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). Chaired by Ambassador Frederico S. Duque Estrada Meyer of Brazil, the meeting will bring together State Parties, international organizations, academic institutions, and civil society representatives to continue discussions on strengthening the Convention and advancing efforts to address biological threats. Public sessions will be webcast through UN Web TV, and side events are expected throughout the week.

This event will take place from August 17-21 at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. Learn more and register by July 31st here.

Biosecurity Simulation Exercise (BSX 2026): Laboratory Incidents & Deliberate Biothreats

From the Asia Centre for Health Security: “This table-top simulation exercise aims to enhance inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary preparedness for laboratory biosafety and biosecurity (LBB) and deliberate biothreat events (DBE). Through lectures, discussions, and structured, scenario-driven exercises, participants will explore decision-making to detect, risk-assess, and manage high-consequence biological incidents under conditions of incomplete information and unfolding events. Participants will collaborate in teams, building on expert perspectives to address issues in surveillance, diagnostics, public health response, security assessment, and risk communication.”

This in-person event will take place from August 27-28. Learn more and register here.

Training Course on ‘Biotechnology Innovation and Biosecurity’

From the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and the Biological Weapons Convention Implementation Support Unit: “This training focuses on strengthening capacities in biosecurity, biosafety, and biological risk management in the context of rapid advances in biotechnology with an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to manage biothreats at the intersection of humans, animals, plants and the environment. It addresses the governance, technical, and operational dimensions of preventing, detecting, and responding to biological threats, while promoting responsible and peaceful scientific research and innovation in accordance with article X of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).”

This in-person event will be held from October 12-16 in New Delhi, India. Learn more and apply here.

Biomanufacturing for Defense & Security Summit

From Diversified Solutions Incorporated (DSI Groups): “This event will bring together senior thought leaders and stakeholders from across DoW, Military Research Labs, Federal Government, Commercial Industry, & Academia to discuss how each are advancing biomanufacturing to enhance national security objectives, produce critical materials for defense applications, and strengthen the overall U.S. bioindustrial manufacturing base. Biomanufacturing is crucial for U.S. national security because it enables domestic production of critical materials, medicines, and defense supplies, reducing reliance on foreign adversaries, which in turn creates resilient supply chains for the military and economy.”

This event will take place from October 27-28 at the National Harbor, MD. Learn more and register here.

WHO Internship Programme

From WHO: “A competent and dynamic health workforce at the heart of each health system is essential to advance global health goals. Countries need a pool of health professionals trained and exposed to the systems and processes in the health sector and who understand how stakeholders interact within the international health arena. WHO’s Internship Programme offers a wide range of opportunities for students and recent graduates to gain insight into the technical and administrative programmes of WHO and enrich their knowledge and experience in various areas, thereby contributing to the advancement of public health.”

Learn more and apply here.

OpenAI Bio Bug Bounty Program

From OpenAI: “As part of our ongoing efforts to strengthen our safeguards for advanced AI capabilities in biology, we’re evolving our GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty to become an ongoing private program—the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program. The program will remain focused on universal jailbreaks that can defeat our predefined biosafety challenge against OpenAI’s frontier models, starting with GPT‑5.6 and going forward. The reward for a universal jailbreak for the OpenAI Bio Bounty Program has been raised from $25,000 to $50,000 for both GPT‑5.6 and GPT‑5.5. Smaller awards may be granted for partial wins at our discretion.”

Learn more and submit your application here.

Disarmament and non-proliferation of WMD – Training Program

From Asser Institute and OPCW: “By 2026, pressure on the international arms control system has reached a point few experts anticipated would arrive so quickly, driven largely by intense geopolitical fragmentation. There is a critical need for professionals who possess the legal, technical, and diplomatic expertise to navigate these modern complexities. This intensive five-day training provides a comprehensive, practical overview of the international non-proliferation and disarmament framework.”

This program will take place from October 26-30 in The Hague, the Netherlands. Learn more and register here.

Pandora Report 1.12.2024

This week’s Pandora Report covers the passing of Graham Pearson, the winners of the 2023 Arms Control Person(s) of the Year contest, growing global COVID-19 case counts, the launch of ERINHA’s INTERCEPTOR project, and more.

Graham Pearson Dead at 88

Famed British scientist, civil servant, and author of The UNSCOM Saga: Chemical and Biological Weapons Non-Proliferation, Graham Pearson, died this month at the age of 88.

An obituary written by his cousin, Oliver Pickering, explains “Arising from a growing interest in arms control, which led him while still in post to work on verification methods to enforce the Biological Weapons Convention, in 1996 he joined Bradford University’s Department of Peace Studies as an honorary visiting research fellow in international security. His skills as an organiser, analyser and writer, helped by his boundless energy and genial personality, involved him in numerous meetings designed to strengthen the BWC, including in Geneva during Pugwash conferences on science and world affairs. He published widely in the field of chemical and biological weapons. Subsequently a visiting professor, he was made a DUniv of Bradford in 2018.”

Read more here.

2023 Arms Control Person(s) of the Year Winner Announced

The Arms Control Association announced the winners of its annual Arms Control Person of the Year contest. This year’s winners are the workers and technicians at the US Army Pueblo Chemical Depot in Colorado and the Blue Grass Army Depot in Kentucky. According to the Association’s press release, “The workers and technicians at the two chemical stockpile depots were nominated for their successful and safe completion of eliminating the last vestiges of the United States’ once-enormous declared stockpile of lethal chemical munitions as required by the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention…Under the supervision of the U.S. Army’s Office of Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives, the last mustard gas munition was destroyed in June at Pueblo; Blue Grass destroyed the last missile loaded with Sarin nerve agent in July. The elimination program cost an estimated $13.5 billion.”

Read more here.

WHO Director-General Says Holiday Gatherings and JN.1 Variants Responsible for Increcased COVID-19 Cases Globally

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told reporters Wednesday that a combination of holiday gatherings and the global spread of the JN.1 variant led to increased transmission of COVID-19 last month. Ghebreyesus said in a statement from Geneva, “Although 10,000 deaths a month is far less than the peak of the pandemic, this level of preventable deaths is not acceptable.”

The Director-General further added that it is “certain” cases are on the rise in places that have failed to report cases in a call to governments to increase surveillance and provide access to treatments and vaccines. The US CDC now estimates that the JN.1 variant is responsible for over 44% of COVID-19 cases nationally.

VOA explained in their article on the topic that, “Maria Van Kerkhove, technical lead at WHO for COVID-19, cited an increase in respiratory diseases across the globe due to the coronavirus but also flu, rhinovirus and pneumonia. “We expect those trends to continue into January through the winter months in the northern hemisphere,” she said, while noting increases in COVID-19 in the southern hemisphere — where it’s now summer…While bouts of coughs, sniffling, fever and fatigue in the winter are nothing new, Van Kerkhove said this year in particular, “We are seeing co-circulation of many different types of pathogens.”‘

European Research Infrastructure on Highly Pathogenic Agents Announces INTERCEPTOR Project

ERINHA recently announced the launch of its INTERCEPTOR project in a statement explaining, “INTERCEPTOR, short for INTERnational Cooperation of high containment research infrastructures: from Epidemic Preparedness TO Response, is a groundbreaking initiative led by the European Research Infrastructure on Highly pathogenic Agents (ERINHA) in collaboration with key high containment laboratories (HCLs) from Europe and around the world.”

“Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) pose a global catastrophic risk, transcending borders and threatening humanity, akin to climate change and biodiversity loss. The recent COVID-19 pandemic underscored the critical importance of global cooperation, research coordination, and the sharing of data and expertise in effectively preparing for and responding to EIDs. Despite these lessons, significant challenges persist, hindering seamless cooperation among HCLs.”

“ERINHA, in partnership with other leading institutions, has taken a bold step to address these challenges by initiating the INTERCEPTOR project. The project’s consortium aims to establish and strengthen interactions with HCL research infrastructures worldwide, with a primary focus on enhancing pandemic preparedness and response capacities.”

DTRA, US Army Developing Treatment to Combat BW Threat Posed by Tularemia and Other Bacterial Agents

Researchers with the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, and Walter Reed Army Institue of Research are working together to develop new antibiotics to treat tularemia as well as anthrax, plague, glanders, and melioidosis. “The partnered institutions seek to address increasing antibiotic resistance among these common bacteria, aiming to counteract the threat of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, both naturally occurring and those possibly engineered for malicious purposes,” according to Army Technology

Read more about this collaboration and the history of tularemia as a biological agent in this piece by Andrew Salerno-Garthwaite.

“Fifty-Five Hours of Risk: The Dangerous Implications of Slow Attack Attribution”

Schar School adjunct professor JD Maddox recently published this article with West Point’s Modern War Institute in which he discusses the delayed attribution of the Islamic State’s dual suicide bombings in Kerman, Iran, earlier this month. He writes in part, “While the United States was not the target of the Islamic State’s physical attacks in Kerman, it was a target of intentional information releases, and the United States’ narrative vulnerability was on full display. Immediately after the attacks, a notorious US-based social media account claiming expertise in open-source intelligence alleged that the supreme leader of Iran ordered the Iranian military to stand down, and the posting attracted nearly seven hundred thousand views by the end of the first day, with thousands of likes and reposts—demonstrating the uncritical acceptance of unchecked information. Meanwhile, anti-Israel accounts on social media were quick to conflate Israel’s actions against Hamas with Israel’s purported attacks in Kerman, and the posts remained online even after Islamic State attribution. Furthermore, op-eds by activist anti-Israel publications like Tasnim News and the Tehran Times appeared after the attack, blaming Israel and the United States for the bombings. Posts like these are the kernels of misinformation from which deliberate disinformation campaigns can be grown.”

“The Evolving Landscape of U.S. Economic Security: The Confluence of Trade, Technology, and National Security”

Schar School adjunct professor Andrea Viski recently published this article in the Korea Economic Institutes journal, Korea Policy: “This paper examines the current evolution of U.S. economic security discourse to demonstrate the implications, challenges, and shortcomings of U.S. economic security tools and the catalyzing impact of technology. While component economic security considerations are broad and encompass issues from natural disaster planning to cybersecurity, this paper focuses specifically on the impact of trade and technology in the economic security context. It discusses the main influences and features of U.S. economic security policy as it relates to trade, technology, and the security of the supply chain. The paper includes sections on evolving notions of the dual-use concept; the need to manage and respond to technology flows with more effective strategies, and new foreign policy efforts and tools to strengthen economic security. The paper focuses on the trends forging the path for the United States to define economic security so closely with national security, and in exploring these trends, it delineates how the United States has implemented policies and adopted, reoriented, or created new policy tools designed to strengthen economic security. The paper also explores why the rapid evolution of emerging technologies has played such a defining role. Finally, the paper examines the effectiveness of the U.S. approach to economic security and its challenges and offers insights into how it can be strengthened in the future”

“ASPR Looks Back at 2023”

Dawn O’Connell, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, reflects on the last year at her agency in this piece, writing in part “We don’t have quiet, slow years at ASPR. We have years that require us to move quickly, to innovate often, and to get the most out of our teams and resources. 2023 was no exception. Looking back, I want us to remember the great work we did on behalf of the American people as we helped our country prepare for, respond to, and recover from public health emergencies and disasters. In 2023, great work happened throughout ASPR, here are some highlights…”

“National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology Interim Report”

The National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology (NCSEB) recently released an interim report following its first year of work. The report’s executive summary explains in part, “Continued U.S. leadership in biotechnology development is not guaranteed. Researchers, inventors, and investors agree that there are significant policy and investment roadblocks that could hinder biotechnology growth and innovation in the United States. One such roadblock is U.S. Government oversight for biotechnology, which needs to be clarified and streamlined. Another roadblock is a lack of both physical infrastructure and the workforce required to operate it. An investment in both human capital and physical infrastructure is critical to continued U.S. leadership in biotechnology. This investment need not come just from government but should draw on both public and private sources of funding, as did the CHIPS and Science Act.”

“After Grilling Fauci on COVID Origins, House Republicans Want to Consider New Rules for Foreign Research”

Sarah Owermohle details the outcome of a recent closed-door briefing during which House GOP members grilled former NIAID Director, Anthony Facui, in this article for STAT News. She explains, “That included lengthy interrogations about federal oversight of foreign labs that received U.S. funding, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a Chinese research establishment that has been central to unproven theories that the virus was leaked from a lab rather than spread to humans from animal contact. In April 2020, President Trump ordered the National Institutes of Health to terminate a coronavirus-focused research project by EcoHealth Alliance based at the Wuhan lab…GOP lawmakers told STAT they were unsatisfied by Fauci’s answers on those grants and the agency’s requirements for funding infectious disease research abroad.”

She continues later in the piece, writing “Those potential improvements include a “better vetting process” for grantees working with labs outside the U.S., and ways to hold them to higher biosafety requirements like properly ventilated spaces, Griffith said.”

“Global Health Security and Diplomacy in 2024: Lead, Leverage, and Elevate”

Hillary H. Carter and Thomas J. Bollyky recently published this piece in Think Global Health discussing key ways to improve human and environmental health in 2024. They focus on turning the themes of lead, leverage, and elevate from “buzzwords to action,” discussing leading through partnerships, leveraging investments for global health security, and elevating health security as a foreign policy priority. They write in their conclusion, “If cooperation, coordination, collaboration, and communication are the cornerstones of efforts to strengthen global health security in 2024 and beyond, diplomacy can harness humanity’s collective potential to meet the health security challenges of the days and years ahead.”

“Interpreting the Biological Weapons Convention – What Are “Necessary Measures” Under Article IV of the Convention?”

Sally Longworth recently published this report with the Swedish Defence Research Agency. She explains in her summary, “Article IV of the Biological Weapons Convention 1972 (BWC) requires States Parties to implement national implementation measures to prohibit and prevent the development, production, stockpiling, retention, acquisition, transfer, and use of biological agents, toxins and weapons in violation of the Convention. No definition of “national implementation measures” is included in the treaty, but there has been over 50 years of State practice in implementing this obligation, which can provide guidance on how States Parties interpret the obligations under Article IV. The Final Declarations agreed by consensus by States Parties at the Convention Review Conferences held every five years are particularly useful tools in understanding what measures are required and what, if any, development there has been in interpreting Article IV. Using legal methods to interpret international treaties, this memo first analyses the obligations set out in Article IV and then considers the interpretative value of the Final Declarations in relation to the BWC. It goes on to highlight a number of measures identified by the States Parties considered necessary in the implementation of the obligations contained in Article IV and important developments in what must be covered.”

“STCE Implementation Guide 2023 Version”

From the World Customs Organization: “The Strategic Trade Control Enforcement Implementation Guide has been the backbone of the STCE programme since its inception in 2016. The latest update of the Guide is currently available in English, and it contains, among other things, updated HS codes of strategic commodities, as well as new Annexes on Post Control Audit and Investigations. Other language versions will follow in 2024.”

NEW: Advancing Threat Agnostic Biodefense Webinar Series

From PNNL: “Join us as we welcome Dr. Betsy Pugel, Planetary Protection Group Lead at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Her talk, titled “Planetary Protection and the Interaction Potential for Fragments Returned to the Earth’s Biosphere from Asteroid or Cometary Material” will be Tuesday, January 16, at noon PT.”

“Is there evidence to ponder the re-evaluation of threats from Unrestricted Earth Returns? When NASA returns samples from planetary bodies, those extraterrestrial samples can be subject to containment if the environment may support life as we currently know it. The temperature, presence of water, and levels of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation present may support that life and so, interaction potential between those extraterrestrial samples and Earth are reduced by taking containment or sterilization measures, known as Restricted Earth Return.”

Register here.

“When Medicine Stops Saving Us: The Antimicrobial Resistance Crisis”

“Interim Dean Abel Valenzuela and the UCLA Division of Social Sciences present an exclusive screening of a new documentary from the team behind the award winning NETFLIX documentary, RESISTANCE. This genre-bending short film, HOLOBIOME, features the harrowing story of UCLA graduate Bradley Burnam’s personal encounter with a deadly superbug. Through a variety of creative elements, HOLOBIOME examines the need for innovation in AMR and questions the overall human relationship with infectious disease and the microbial world. The screening will be followed by an interdisciplinary panel discussing the looming AMR crisis through the lenses of sociology, public policy, industry, and public health.”

This event will be moderated by Biodefense PhD Program alumna Jomana Musmar. It will take place on January 22, at 5 pm PST. Learn more and register here.

AI Executive Order Report Card Reviewing the First 90 Days

“On October 30, 2023, the Biden Administration issued a call to action outlining a host of requirements and deliverables for U.S. government agencies on artificial intelligence. The executive order touched on a range of AI-relevant issues, including testing and evaluation of new AI systems, developing a healthy and capable U.S. AI workforce, and ensuring U.S. competitiveness in the years to come.”

“Join CSET researchers on January 31, 2024, for a discussion of what the U.S. Government has accomplished so far, what have we learned, and what’s left to do to complete the EO’s ambitious goals.”

This online event will begin at 12 pm EST. Learn more and register here.

International Conference, CBRNE Research & Innovation

“The last 40 years have demonstrated that both military and civilian populations could be exposed to highly hazardous CBRNE agents following conflicts, natural outbreaks and disasters, industrial incidents or terrorist attacks.”

“Worldwide, researchers, responders and industrial capacities have been commited to provide adapted response to these challenges.”

“Building on the success of the first 5 International Conferences « CBRNE Research and Innovation » which took place in Antibes (2015), Lyon (2017), Nantes (2019), on line (2021) and Lille (2022), we want to give you a new opportunity to build up or strengthen collaborative networks in Strabourg (March 19th – 21rst 2024).”

“The CBRNE R&I Conference is specifically devoted to scientific updates, responders’ feedbacks and expression of needs. It also includes workshops and demonstrations of innovative materials, technologies and procedures, according to the following themes: DETECTION – IDENTIFICATION, PROTECTION – DECONTAMINATION, MEDICAL COUNTERMEASURES, RISKS & CRISIS MANAGEMENT.”

“Looking forward to your proposals for communication and to welcoming you at Strasbourg in March 2024!”

Learn more here.

Registration for GHS 2024 Now Open

Registration is now open for the Global Health Security 2024 conference in Sydney, Australia. This iteration will take place 18-21 June, 2024. The call for abstracts is also still open. “The mission of the Global Health Security conference is to provide a forum where leaders, researchers, policy-makers, and representatives from government, international organisations, civil society, and private industry from around the world can engage with each other, review the latest research and policy innovations, and agree solutions for making the world safer and healthier. To that end, our mission is to help foster a genuinely multidisciplinary community of practice that is committed to working collaboratively to enhance global health security and eliminate disease, irrespective of its origin or source.”

Pandora Report 3.10.2023

This week we tackle the addition of three subsidiaries of BGI Group (formerly the Beijing Genomics Institute) to the US Entity List, the ongoing discussion regarding DOE’s recent COVID-19 origins assessment, congressional hearings on the same subject, and updates on the suspected poisonings of school girls in Iran. This issue also has several new publications and upcoming events, including one discussing the outcome of Germany’s intervention in a suspected IS-inspired plot using ricin and an upcoming book talk with Dr. Katherine Paris, an alumna of the Biodefense PhD program.

US Department of Commerce Adds Three BGI Subsidiaries to Entity List

Effective March 2, 2023, the US Department of Commerce officially added three subsidiaries of BGI Group, formerly the Beijing Genomics Institute, to the Entity List. The Entity List is published by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and requires foreign persons, entities, and governments to meet US licensing requirements for export and transfer of certain items. Placement on the list does not prohibit companies and persons in the US from purchasing from or doing business with these entities. About 600 Chinese entities are on the list, including many known to have aided the PLA in creating artificial islands throughout the South China Sea. The Biden administration has added over 110 Chinese entities to the list, in large part because of the PRC’s military-civil fusion policies and the two-way transfers they have facilitated between companies, research institutions, universities, and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

The BIS announcement read in part: “The ERC [End-User Review Committee] determined to add BGI Research; BGI Tech Solutions (Hongkong) Co., Ltd.; and Forensic Genomics International, to the Entity List, under the destination of China, pursuant to § 744.11 of the EAR. The addition of these entities is based upon information that indicates their collection and analysis of genetic data poses a significant risk of contributing to monitoring and surveillance by the government of China, which has been utilized in the repression of ethnic minorities in China. Information also indicates that the actions of these entities concerning the collection and analysis of genetic data present a significant risk of diversion to China’s military programs. These entities are added with a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR.”

BGI released a statement in response to the announcement, saying “We believe the BIS’s decision may have been impacted by misinformation and we are willing and able to clarify. BGI Group’s work strictly abides by local, regional, and global moral and ethical standards, and adheres to all required laws and regulations. BGI Group does not condone and would never be involved in any human-rights abuses. None of BGI Group is state-owned or state-controlled, and all of BGI Group’s services and research are provided for civilian and scientific purposes.”

As we discussed early last year, BGI is known to have used its NIFTY test, a prenatal test used globally, to collect data in collaboration with the PLA. Furthermore, early in the pandemic, as the US struggled to build testing capacity and states could not run their own tests in their state labs, BGI Group targeted US state governments with cheap tests that promised to rapidly increase their capacity. The company also worked with the PLA on projects aiming to make ethnic Han Chinese people less susceptible to altitude sickness, though BGI Group claims this work was purely academic in nature. The all adds to growing concerns that foreign entities are using seemingly harmless products, such as at-home DNA tests like 23andMe or AncestryDNA, can be exploited by adversaries.

COVID-19 Origins…Familiar Arguments, Renewed Vitriol

Predictably, discussion of last week’s announcement that the Department of Energy assesses with low confidence that SARS-CoV-2 very likely originated in a laboratory has continued with much fervor this week. This section covers some recent publications discussing this as well as the recent congressional hearing focused on the matter.

Updates on Discussion of DOE and FBI’s Assessments

As we discussed last week, there has been a lot of online discussion of the updated intelligence assessment from DOE that inadequately explains what the Department actually found and what it means. Cheryl Rofer explains in her recent Scientific American piece that 90 day intelligence estimates are not the end-all and be-all, especially in a situation like this. She writes that “An intelligence assessment isn’t a scientific conclusion. They are different beasts. The summary itself observes that different agencies weigh intelligence reporting and scientific publications differently. The important factor for intelligence assessments is the veracity of sources, whereas scientific conclusions depend on data and the coherence of the argument the data support. However, data from a scientist who has proved unreliable in the past will weigh less heavily in scientific conclusions, and intelligence analysts will regard fanciful stories from an otherwise reliable informant skeptically. The scientific data are available to the public, unlike the reporting that underlies the intelligence assessments.”

Rofer also explains how the intelligence divisions of national laboratories work, writing “Cutting-edge science is the expertise of the Department of Energy, however, which runs 17 national laboratories, several studying SARS-CoV-2 and its origins. Intelligence professionals in the national laboratories work with scientists to develop assessments. Because they are embedded in the laboratories, they can develop working relationships to explore puzzles of science and intelligence. Because I was responsible for a similar environmental cleanup site at Los Alamos National Laboratory, a question that I was involved in during the 1990s was whether the Soviets had done hydrodynamic tests at the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site, scattering metallic plutonium chunks. Members of the intelligence division came to me and other chemists, and our physicist colleagues, to learn how and why such tests would have been performed, and what clues they would leave behind for analysts to spot. Eventually, we found that indeed tests were run in this way. A joint program with Russia and Kazakhstan recovered 100 kilograms of plutonium that might have gone to scavengers, as a result of this detective work.”

Furthermore, as Drs. Angela Rasmussen and Saskia Popescu (assistant professor in the Schar School Biodefense Program) explain in their piece for the Washington Post, “No new evidence is available for public scrutiny. It is impossible to evaluate the Energy Department’s claims. Yet they have been repeated in many quarters as if they were proof of a lab origin — a belief that fuels demands to curtail work on dangerous infectious agents…This circus makes the United States and the world less prepared, not more, to defend itself against emerging pathogens that could lead to pandemics, including the alarming influenza strain H5N1 spreading globally in animals or the deadly Marburg virus outbreakin Equatorial Guinea.”

In their piece, Rasmussen and Popescu highlight the critical oversight of the risk that cities where people and animals live in close contact pose. They write “Only in a city with a large, mobile, interactive population of people and animals could the virus establish sustained onward transmission from person to person. This pandemic could have just as easily begun in Beijing, Shanghai or Guangzhou — where SARS-CoV-1 emerged in 2002, also as a direct result of the sale of live animals at “wet markets.”

Promised Congressional Hearings Kick-Off with House Oversight Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Hearing

Rasmussen and Popescu summarize much of the problems and concerns with the congressional hearing in their piece mentioned previously, writing “Deepening partisanship on covid-19 hinders progress at home and abroad. None of the witnesses called so far by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic for its first hearing this week has technical expertise on SARS-CoV-2 origins science. Few have experience within the covid-19 response effort. All have promoted pro-lab leak opinions without providing any evidence to support their claims. It is easier to place blame than to address systemic issues that led to more than a million covid deaths in the United States.”

The majority’s witnesses included Dr. Jamie Metzl, a historian of Southeast Asia whose career has largely centered on humanitarian policy; Nicholas Wade, a former science editor at the New York Times who drew criticism for his 2014 book that asked, in reference to economic issues in many African countries, whether “variations in their nature, such as their time preference, work ethic and propensity to violence, have some bearing on the economic decisions they make.”; and Dr. Robert Redfield, a physician who was the CDC director during the Trump administration and has ample clinical research experience, largely focused on HIV/AIDS. The minority witness was Dr. Paul Auwaerter, an infectious disease physician whose researcher includes work on Lyme Disease and EBV.

As Jon Cohen explains in Science Insider-“Some scientists and legislators might have hoped this morning’s U.S. congressional hearing on the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic would move beyond partisan politics and seriously investigate what has become a deeply divisive debate. But members of the House of Representatives’ Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic mostly hammered home long-standing Republican or Democratic talking points, shedding no new light on the central question: Did SARS-CoV-2 naturally jump from animals to humans or did the virus somehow leak from a laboratory in Wuhan, China?”

Of course, much of the witness statements and questions focused on the EcoHealth Alliance and its role in projects with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In response to several of the statements, the EcoHealth Alliance issues these corrections to assertions made at the hearing. Of particular interest is the status of the DEFUSE proposal that was submitted to DARPA, a frequent talking point in online lab-leak discussions. Of this, the Alliance writes plainly “…the proposal was not funded and the work was never done, therefore it cannot have played a role in the origin of COVID-19.”

Bloomberg also published a piece discussing how this drawn out, unproductive discourse obscures the rise globally of high-security biolabs, which features the work of Biodefense Graduate Program Director Dr. Gregory Koblentz and Dr. Filippa Lentzos of King’s College London. Of the politicization this has brought, Dr. Koblentz was quoted saying “Nobody wants lab accidents…Unfortunately this issue has become politicized and polarized. That’s because the people with the loudest voices have had the microphone.

Iran Poisonings

According to NBC, at least 2,000 people in Iran have reported symptoms since concerns about deliberate poisonings of schoolgirls in the country first emerged, though some members of parliament estimate that number could be as high as 5,000. This comes as videos circulate of young girls coughing profusely as they are escorted out of school, with others showing girls slumped over and struggling to breathe in hospitals. So far, 30 schools in at least 10 provinces have reported cases of girls mysteriously falling ill. This has led to mounting protests in Tehran, which is particularly troubling in light of recent protests over the death of Mahsa (Jina) Amini, a young Kurdish woman, in police custody after she was arrested by the Islamic religious police for allegedly violating modesty standards.

President Ebrahim Raisi spoke out this week about the issue, ordering investigations and telling the cabinet that these incidents are “an inhumane crime” aimed “at intimidating the students, our dear children, and their parents,” according to state media. The supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamene, also said that, if these allegations are confirmed, that they constitute a “great and unforgivable crime” and that “the culprits must face the toughest of punishments.”

“Can a 1975 Bioweapons Ban Handle Today’s Biothreats?”

In this piece for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Matt Field writes “Rapid advances in biotechnology and the lack of an enforcement mechanism are challenging the Biological Weapons Convention. Amid swirling allegations that countries are violating the treaty, are slow-moving attempts to update it enough to prevent biological doom?” In it, he discusses challenges in adapting the treaty to current issues, quoting Biodefense Graduate Program Director Dr. Gregory Koblentz, writing “It is worrisome that states parties can’t agree on relatively simple propositions that would ensure that the Article 1 prohibition on developing biological weapons includes biological agents produced or modified via emerging technologies such as genome editing,” Koblentz, the George Mason University biosecurity expert, said.”

“Model Law for National Implementation of the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention and Related Requirements of UN Security Council Resolution 1540”

New from VERTIC: “This Model Law was developed to assist countries in drafting legislation to implement the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention and the biological weapons-related provisions of UN Security Council Resolution 1540.”

“It can be used to identify all the relevant measures that should be included in national legislation to give effect to the BWC and related provisions of UNSCR 1540. It can further be used during the legislative drafting process. As there is no “one size fits all” approach for the drafting of national implementing legislation, each state should determine the type of implementing measures it requires in accordance with its constitutional processes, legal tradition, existing legal framework, activities in the field of bioscience and other national circumstances. The Model Law is therefore intended to provide a useful basis to draft BWC implementing legislation and can be used to draft new legislation, or amend existing laws and/or regulations.”

“Ricin’s Round Two: Germany Prevents Another Islamic State-Motivated Bioterrorism Attack”

Herbet Maack’s piece in the Terrorism Monitor discusses the outcomes of Germany’s January intervention in a suspected IS-inspired attack. Maack writes in his conclusion, “The disrupted plot of Monir J. and Jalal L. shows the continued threat from loosely IS-connected and IS-inspired individuals. It also underscores the continued interest of Islamist-motivated perpetrators in bioterrorism and their desire to inflict significant losses of life. For Germany, the disrupted plot was already the second one involving ricin. While US-German counterterrorism intelligence cooperation seems to be functioning well, the potentially catastrophic consequences for any failure should cause Berlin to consider strengthening its own domestic counter-terrorism intelligence gathering capabilities.”

“Diverse Voices in International Security: NTI’s Gabby Essix on Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Biosecurity Field”

This interview with Grabby Essix, a Bio Program Officer at the Nuclear Threat Initiative, discusses DEI efforts in the biosecurity field: “NTI is committed to highlighting and supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the peace and security field. During February, Black History Month, NTI Deputy Vice President for Communications Rachel Staley Grant sat down with NTI | bio Program Officer Gabrielle (Gabby) Essix to discuss DEI efforts in the biosecurity field. Essix supports NTI’s efforts to increase global action on biological and health security through the Global Biosecurity Dialogue and the Global Health Security Index and she leads NTI’s annual Next Generation for Biosecurity Competition. Since 2017, this competition has fostered professional development for rising global leaders in the field of biosecurity and biosafety, and it promotes DEI within the global health security community.”

“Toxic Inheritance: Assessing North Korea’s Chemical Weapons Capability”

This essay from Royal United Services Institute discusses ongoing work using open source research and remote sensing technologies to assess the DPRK’s CW capabilities and production capacity. This essay provides a review of historical documents related to the program and identifies 33 sites of interest in the country, with the promise of creating a map of more sites at a later date with alleged links to CW production.

“Verification of Exposure to Chemical Warfare Agents Through Analysis of Persistent Biomarkers in Plants”

De Bruin-Hoegée et al. discuss the possibility of using plant biomarkers in forensic reconstructions of chemical warfare attacks in their article in Analytical Methods. Abstract: “The continuing threats of military conflicts and terrorism may involve the misuse of chemical weapons. The present study aims to use environmental samples to find evidence of the release of such agents at an incident scene. A novel approach was developed for identifying protein adducts in plants. Basil (Ocimum basilicum), bay laurel leaf (Laurus nobilis) and stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) were exposed to 2.5 to 150 mg m−3 sulfur mustard, 2.5 to 250 mg m−3 sarin, and 0.5 to 25 g m−3 chlorine gas. The vapors of the selected chemicals were generated under controlled conditions in a dedicated set-up. After sample preparation and digestion, the samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS), respectively. In the case of chlorine exposure, it was found that 3-chloro- and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine adducts were formed. As a result of sarin exposure, the o-isopropyl methylphosphonic acid adduct to tyrosine could be analyzed, and after sulfur mustard exposure the N1- and N3-HETE-histidine adducts were identified. The lowest vapor exposure levels for which these plant adducts could be detected, were 2.5 mg m−3 for sarin, 50 mg m−3 for chlorine and 12.5 mg m−3 for sulfur mustard. Additionally, protein adducts following a liquid exposure of only 2 nmol Novichock A-234, 0.4 nmol sarin and 0.2 nmol sulfur mustard could still be observed. For both vapor and liquid exposure, the amount of adduct formed increased with the level of exposure. In all cases synthetic reference standards were used for unambiguous identification. The window of opportunity for investigation of agent exposure through the analysis of plant material was found to be remarkably long. Even three months after the actual exposure, the biomarkers could still be detected in the living plants, as well as in dried leaves. An important benefit of the current method is that a relatively simple and generic sample work-up procedure can be applied for all agents studied. In conclusion, the presented work clearly demonstrates the possibility of analyzing chemical warfare agent biomarkers in plants, which is useful for forensic reconstructions, including the investigation into alleged use in conflict areas.”

“Twenty Years Ago in Iraq, Ignoring the Expert Weapons Inspectors Proved To Be a Fatal Mistake”

In this essay for the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Robert E. Kelley discusses the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 and faulty claims about Iraqi WMD programs that drove the decision to invade. He writes in part, “I was in Iraq in those final months before the 2003 invasion as Deputy for Analysis of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Action Team tasked with the nuclear side of the weapons inspections, while the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) worked in parallel, looking for biological and chemical weapons, as well as illicit missile programmes. We studied a few outstanding questions regarding the Iraqi nuclear weapons programme that had been discovered and dismantled in the early 1990s; we looked for new evidence and investigated leads and suspicions passed on to us by national governments; we inspected many sites and interviewed Iraqi scientists and officials in person; and we analysed the data. By early 2003 we knew at a very high level of confidence that there was no nuclear weapons effort of any kind in Iraq, and we were regularly passing this information back to the UN Security Council. We were not wrong.”

“ChatGPT: Opportunities and Challenges for the Nuclear Agenda”

In this work published by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Yanliang Pan discusses the potential for misuse of ChatGPT in academia, politics, and cybersecurity, focusing on the nuclear agenda. He writes in part, “However, just as AI instruments can be used to advance the nuclear agenda, they also present risks that cannot be ignored. For instance, ChatGPT’s potential to enhance the capabilities of malign cyber actors represents a serious danger to nuclear security. With the digitalization of instrumentation and control systems, nuclear facilities are increasingly vulnerable to cyber threats, including malware and phishing attacks that ChatGPT is most proficient in assisting.  Testing shows, for example, that the AI model has no qualms about writing fake emails to nuclear facility employees asking for access credentials – in different languages and styles of writing as requested…Indeed, it has no way of knowing whether the email is fake at all as it lacks the ability to check the user’s credentials. Upon the user’s request, the AI model will also identify common vulnerabilities in specific systems of a nuclear facility and list the malware that has been used in the past to target those systems…”

“Now AI Can Be Used to Design New Proteins”

In this piece for TheScientist, Dr. Kamal Nahas explains advancements in AI, writing “Artificial intelligence algorithms have had a meteoric impact on protein structure, such as when DeepMind’s AlphaFold2 predicted the structures of 200 million proteins. Now, David Baker and his team of biochemists at the University of Washington have taken protein-folding AI a step further. In a Nature publication from February 22, they outlined how they used AI to design tailor-made, functional proteins that they could synthesize and produce in live cells, creating new opportunities for protein engineering. Ali Madani, founder and CEO of Profluent, a company that uses other AI technology to design proteins, says this study “went the distance” in protein design and remarks that we’re now witnessing “the burgeoning of a new field.”

“Trust In US Federal, State, And Local Public Health Agencies During COVID-19: Responses And Policy Implications”

From Health Affairs: “Public health agencies’ ability to protect health in the wake of COVID-19 largely depends on public trust. In February 2022 we conducted a first-of-its-kind nationally representative survey of 4,208 US adults to learn the public’s reported reasons for trust in federal, state, and local public health agencies. Among respondents who expressed a “great deal” of trust, that trust was not related primarily to agencies’ ability to control the spread of COVID-19 but, rather, to beliefs that those agencies made clear, science-based recommendations and provided protective resources. Scientific expertise was a more commonly reported reason for “a great deal” of trust at the federal level, whereas perceptions of hard work, compassionate policy, and direct services were emphasized more at the state and local levels. Although trust in public health agencies was not especially high, few respondents indicated that they had no trust. Lower trust was related primarily to respondents’ beliefs that health recommendations were politically influenced and inconsistent. The least trusting respondents also endorsed concerns about private-sector influence and excessive restrictions and had low trust in government overall. Our findings suggest the need to support a robust federal, state, and local public health communications infrastructure; ensure agencies’ authority to make science-based recommendations; and develop strategies for engaging different segments of the public.”

Global BioLabs 2023 Launch- “High Consequence Bio Labs: Growing Risks and Lagging Governance”

“The Global Biolabs Initiative is proud to announce the launch of its new report, Global BioLabs 2023, and an updated interactive map of BSL4 and BSL3+ labs. With the global expansion of BSL4 and BSL3+ labs, gaps in biosecurity and biosafety governance are widening. Since its inception in 2021, the Global Biolabs Initiative has tracked the proliferation of the highest containment labs, identified several key trends in their construction and operation, developed biorisk management scorecards to measure how well countries are governing biosafety, biosecurity, and dual-use research, and mapped the global biorisk management architecture. The pace of BSL4/BSL3+ labs expansion is outpacing current biosafety and biosecurity regulations, and coordinated international action is needed to address increasing biorisks.”

“Dr Filippa Lentzos, King’s College London, and Dr Gregory Koblentz, George Mason University, will present the Global BioLabs 2023 report, describe key trends, and discuss recommendations for strengthening global biorisk management. The event will also feature a demonstration of the interactive map: globalbiolabs.org.”

This event will take place March 16, 2023, 1 pm GMT. Register for the Zoom webinar here and access Global Biolabs tools and resources at globalbiolabs.org.

Credit: The BulletinGlobal Biolabs

Penetrate, Exploit, Disrupt, Destroy – with Dr. Craig J. Wiener

From the Alperovitch Institute: “Join us on Wednesday, March 15th at 5pm at the SAIS Hopkins Kenney Auditorium. Dr. Craig J. Wiener is recognized as an expert in major foreign adversary espionage, sabotage and strategic capabilities that pose threats to the U.S. Government (USG) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Dr. Wiener’s previous position was as the Senior Technical Analyst for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence where he fulfilled a role as DOE’s lead all source cyber threat analyst, the Department’s representative to the National Security Council for Cyber Operations, a key member of National Intelligence Council Special Analytic Groups, and a government briefer and/or advisor for Defense Science Board studies on Cyber as a Strategic Capability, Homeland Defense, Strategic Surprise and the future of US Military Superiority among other topics. Additionally, Dr. Wiener initiated and led studies for special nuclear weapons related threat and vulnerability analyses and advanced technical security threats to USG equities by foreign adversaries and engaged in the development, planning and operationalization of counter-adversary strategies across multiple domains of operations. Dr. Wiener joined the MITRE Corporation as a Technical Fellow in early-2020, where he supports key U.S. Government (USG) national security initiatives. He was recently appointed by the Secretary of Energy to the Electricity Advisory Committee to advise DOE on current and future electric grid reliability, resilience, security, sector interdependence, and policy issues.”

Dr. Wiener is an alumnus of the Biodefense PhD Program! Learn more and register for this event here.

Online Event: Discussion with Amb. van der Kwast About What to Expect at the 5th CWC Review Conference

“The Fifth Five-Year Review Conference (RC-5) for the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention will be held in the Hague from May 15-19, 2023.”

“At the conference, member states and the broader chemical weapons disarmament community will gather to assess past achievements, treaty implementation, and compliance, and discuss plans to strengthen the CWC in the years ahead.”

“You are invited to join a virtual discussion with Ambassador Henk Cor van der Kwast, the chair-designate for the Review Conference, who will share his hopes and expectations for the conference’s outcomes.”

“Paul Walker, the Chair of the CWC Coalition, will moderate. Amb. van der Kwast’s remarks will be followed by a Q&A session.”

“This discussion will be on the record.”

“This special event will be open to all members of the CWC Coalition, and other interested members of the public, journalists, and diplomats.”

This webinar will take place on March 21 at 11 am EST. Register here.

Book Talk with Dr. Katherine Paris on “Genome Editing and Biological Weapons: Assessing the Risk of Misuse”

“Dr. Katherine Paris, an alumnus of the Mason Biodefense PhD program, recently released her new book “Genome Editing and Biological Weapons: Assessing the Risk of Misuse.” Join the NextGen Global Health Security Network for a conversation with Dr. Paris to learn about her research!” This event will take place on Wednesday, March 22, from 7-8 PM. Register for the Zoom here: https://cglink.me/2d7/r2064992

Intelligence Studies Consortium

“On March 24, 2023, the Intelligence Studies Consortium is convening its third symposium, entitled New Perspectives in Intelligence Studies. This year, George Mason’s Schar School of Policy and Government is hosting. The symposium will be from 8 AM to 4 PM in Rooms 125-126 Van Metre Hall, 3351 Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. The closest Metro is Virginia Square/GMU on the Orange and Silver lines.

The symposium will feature student presentations in four panels:

  • Russia and China
  • Violent Non-State Actors
  • Emerging Technologies
  • Transnational Challenges

There will be an 8:30 AM keynote address from the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Shannon Corless, and a lunchtime conversation with General Michael V. Hayden.

We encourage students to attend in person. We have also provided a livestream option for those not in the Washington DC area.”

Learn more and register here.

Weekly Trivia Question

You read the Pandora Report every week and now it’s time for you to show off what you know! The first person to send the correct answer to biodefense@gmu.edu will get a shout out in the following issue (first name last initial). Our question this week is: In 1978, Georgi Markov, a Bulgarian dissident, was poisoned with what agent?

Shout out to Scott H. for winning last week’s trivia! The correct answer to last week’s question, “This chemical agent features in Roald Dahl’s famous short story, The Landlady, in which the main character is given a tea that tastes of bitter almonds. What is the name of this agent?” is potassium cyanide.